[Codel] sprout

2013-07-10 Thread Dave Taht
I haven't been paying a lot of attention to rmcat and webrtc until recently, although I'd had a nice discussion with keith on it a while back.. this particular thread sums up some interesting issues on that front. http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/rmcat/current/msg00390.html -- Dave Täht

Re: [Codel] sprout

2013-07-10 Thread Keith Winstein
Thank, Dave. We have a Web site with more info, a talk, and source code ( http://alfalfa.mit.edu) if anybody is interested. Something that may interest folks here is that we compared Sprout-over-unlimited-buffer with TCP-Cubic-over-CoDel on these cellular-type links. That is, a scenario where

Re: [Codel] sprout

2013-07-10 Thread Keith Winstein
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org wrote: Did you compare with fq_codel? None of us (Van included) advocate CoDel by itself. Hi Jim, In our evaluation there's only one flow over the queue (in each direction) -- the videoconference. So, yes. In the upcoming

Re: [Codel] sprout

2013-07-10 Thread Jim Gettys
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Keith Winstein kei...@mit.edu wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org wrote: Did you compare with fq_codel? None of us (Van included) advocate CoDel by itself. Hi Jim, In our evaluation there's only one flow over the queue

Re: [Codel] sprout

2013-07-10 Thread Dave Taht
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Keith Winstein kei...@mit.edu wrote: On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:38 PM, Jim Gettys j...@freedesktop.org wrote: Did you compare with fq_codel? None of us (Van included) advocate CoDel by