It is amazing how many different ways people can do themselves in with
knobs. In this case there was an off-by-1000 error in calculating the
fq_codel target and interval.
https://forum.vyos.io/t/what-kind-of-performance-should-be-expected-when-applying-fq-codel-on-a-shaper-policy/13841
But I am
I think this is a very encouraging paper. The 6 stages required to do
this tho...
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10329918
--
40 years of net history, a couple songs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
___
Codel
Apparently there was a bug that prevented the fq_codel module from
being loaded, leading to:
"Change default TCP queue discipline to fq_codel to address missing
patch in SLES 15SP4. This is intended to address many of the
communication failures larger scale jobs are experiencing."
From:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1084804523001911
--
40 years of net history, a couple songs:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
slow start.
>
>
>
> Thank you again for your valuable comments, which have given us a deeper
> understanding of network optimization and for our future researches. Wishing
> you a happy new year!
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
>
> Li
>
>
>
>
>
>
on if implemented at a
> single end-node delivers "better" numbers for that end-node but also on its
> effect on the rest of the network).**
>
> **) I occasionally wish for a tit-for-tat scheduler that is generous at first
> but will "retaliate" if a flow abuses tha
I am very happy to be seeing various advances in slow start techniques.
thank you! A packet capture, however, would be more revealing...
On Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 12:44 PM Sebastian Moeller wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
>
> > On Oct 14, 2023, at 21:01, Dave Taht wrote:
> >
> > netstat -I en0 -qq
>
> Here is a bit of output from macosx
I would really like someone with a fresh set of eyeballs to review the
"codel" portion of apple's latest code drop here:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7118969694987935744/
--
Oct 30: https://netdevconf.info/0x17/news/the-maestro-and-the-music-bof.html
Dave Täht CSO,
not work for end
> >> systems to find the bottleneck bandwidth on some unknown intermediate
> >> node. However, it can deliver useful information for scheduling algorithms
> >> in forwarding nodes, which is the use case in this paper, and which may be
> >> of
Promising approach:
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10188775
--
Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bxmoBr4cBKg
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
has some things in it trying to match rps to throughput.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7083496735477501952/
--
Podcast:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7058793910227111937/
Dave Täht CSO, LibreQos
___
Codel
A March 31: https://www.broadband.io/c/broadband-grant-events/dave-taht
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
now in p4
https://blog.apnic.net/2022/11/11/continuous-in-network-round-trip-time-monitoring/
So happy more and more folk are "listening to networks":
https://pollere.net/Pdfdocs/ListeningGoog.pdf
--
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
I remember when I thought videoconferencing quality like this, was good.
VJ, on Kathie's codel, and a ton of queue theory that seems to have
sunk in around the world, with a talk that still seems fresh.
https://archive.org/details/video1_20191129
--
This song goes out to all the folk that
uses a vegas or gradient-like controller:
https://github.com/Netflix/concurrency-limits
--
This song goes out to all the folk that thought Stadia would work:
https://www.linkedin.com/posts/dtaht_the-mushroom-song-activity-698135607352320-FXtz
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
cket switched network model, in the face of overwhelming
differences in real world (overwhemingly wireless) behaviors...
... It seems easier to improve the transports than fix the routers at
this point. Much as bbr models policers today perhaps it's best to try
and model more network types.
>
df
For now.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 6:50 AM Dave Taht wrote:
>
> thx for the comments everyone!
>
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 3:16 AM Bjørn Ivar Teigen via Starlink
> wrote:
> >
> > Very good point. Perhaps we can think of it as "at what point does delay
> > equ
be fair there are queuing theory models that include packet loss (which
>> > is the case for the paper Dave is asking about here), and these can work
>> > perfectly well for load > 1. Agree about the CC feedback loops affecting
>> > the results though. Even if the
Occasionally I pass along a recent paper that I don't understand in
the hope that someone can enlighten me.
This is one of those occasions, where I am trying to leverage what I
understand of existing FQ-codel behaviors against real traffic.
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2022/4539940/
featuring "SlowFast-codel":
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2206.02906.pdf
--
FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
I like the degree to which "sojourn time" has been socialized.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-miao-rtgwg-hpccplus/
--
FQ World Domination pending: https://blog.cerowrt.org/post/state_of_fq_codel/
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
___
Codel mailing
l is
> distracting from the task at hand:
> "Is Jonathan going to confirm that his 'throughput bonus' and 'fast
> lane' accusations against DualQ are baseless because his experiment was
> broken?"
>
> Nonetheless, response on FQ-CoDel is below, tagged [BB]...
>
https://tcpcc.systemsapproach.org/aqm.html#fig-good-bad
--
I tried to build a better future, a few times:
https://wayforward.archive.org/?site=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.icei.org
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
is this concept useful to us? (e.g. SKB_DROP_REASON_CONGESTION)
-- Forwarded message -
From:
Date: Sat, Jan 29, 2022 at 7:54 PM
Subject: [PATCH v3 net-next 1/7] net: skb_drop_reason: add document
for drop reasons
To: ,
Cc: , , ,
, ,
, , ,
, , ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
, ,
,
From:
I've been beginning to worry that multiple implementations have been
getting the drop scheduler incorrect for codel.
The openbsd implementation caps the count at 400:
https://github.com/openbsd/src/blob/2207c4325726fdc5c4bcd0011af0fdf7d3dab137/sys/net/fq_codel.c#L263
--
Fixing Starlink's
At least they have a PR department.
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 11:09 PM Jonathan Morton
wrote:
> On 21 Sep, 2021, at 5:57 pm, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> https://www.utsz.edu.cn/en/article/view/id-20218.html
>
> paper here:
>
> https://sci-hub.se/10.1109/TNET.2021.3066505
>
&
https://www.utsz.edu.cn/en/article/view/id-20218.html
paper here:
https://sci-hub.se/10.1109/TNET.2021.3066505
--
Fixing Starlink's Latencies: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c9gLo6Xrwgw
Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
___
Codel mailing list
I just wanted to comment on how awesome this thread was, and how few
people outside this group deeply grok what was discussed here. I would
so like
to somehow construct an educational TV series explaining "How the
Internet really works" to a wider, and new audience, consisting of
animations,
etting packets from here to there, multiplexing the
> underlying resources. That's it. Quality is a whole different thing. Quality
> can be improved by end-to-end approaches, if the underlying network provides
> some kind of thing that actually creates a way for end-to-end app
The program committee members are *amazing*. Perhaps, finally, we can
move the bar for the internet's quality metrics past endless, blind
repetitions of speedtest.
For complete details, please see:
https://www.iab.org/activities/workshops/network-quality/
Submissions Due: Monday 2nd August 2021,
https://www.comsys.rwth-aachen.de/fileadmin/papers/2021/2021-kunze-aqm-tofino-p4.pdf
For a codel comparison, see:
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2010.04528v1.pdf
Where the authors show that fq_codel is feasible on the PISA platform...
but a direct comparison between the two papers is not possible. What
There are a couple interesting features in this, notably specific
modes for ack compression, quic, and tcp.
https://github.com/apple-opensource/xnu/blob/master/bsd/net/classq/classq_fq_codel.c
--
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother
After suffering through a FCC roundtable, I stumbled upon this, and I
feel much better about life again.
https://archive.org/details/video1_20191129
--
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
See: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2012.14996.pdf
Things I really like:
* they used flent
* Using "variance" as the principal signal. This is essentially one of
the great unpublished and unanalyzed improvements on the minstrel
algorithm as well
* Conventional ecn response
* outperforms bbr on variable
probably one of the best comparisons of red vs codel, at low rtts,
I've seen as yet.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1049/cmu2.12061
--
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public
relations, for Mother Nature cannot be fooled" - Richard Feynman
up until this moment I had no idea "nsscodel" had been offloaded onto
this chipset and somewhat folded into openwrt
https://forum.openwrt.org/t/ipq806x-nss-drivers/12613/
I knew it existed in multiple commercial products, but...
--
Make Music, Not War
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jaehwoon-icc-gacodel-00
--
Make Music, Not War
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
CWC: Simple and Stateless AQM Capable of Handling High Priority Thin
Flows to Prevent Bufferbloat
https://sci-hub.tw/https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8951747
--
Make Music, Not War
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729
The althea CTO is a passionate codel fan and took the time out to talk
"about codel, & why ISP speed tiers are obsolete" in a preso dedicated
to it.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9wZbmuXS_K0
He closes with: "Maybe you are not ready to use altheamesh yet. Codel
is the default traffic management
I would really like more folk to remotely attend the tsvwg wg meeting,
which is this monday:
16:10-18:10Monday Afternoon session II Prague time.
which is where we will hopefully get a chance to present SCE, and get
an update on the L4S/tcpprague/dualpi worker, also. The schedule is
here:
Everybody, calm down. I put this out merely to get comment before we
submitted the first of several drafts. That draft is now submitted and
we've asked for a talk slot in the tsvwg for it. I cc'd the world to
get quick initial feedback, and I want to shut this overbroad
conversation down and move
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 8:23 PM Michael Richardson wrote:
>
>
> Holland, Jake wrote:
> > 1.
> > "Some" in "Some Congestion Experienced" is maybe misleading, and
> > arguably has the same meaning as "Congestion Experienced".
>
> > I was thinking maybe "Pre-Congestion Experienced"
. Ironically the ietf tools do not take upper case,
so I had to rename the draft in the github repo. this is where it lies
now:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-morton-taht-sce/
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 2:28 PM Dave Taht wrote:
>
> AHA!
>
> http://www.hjp.at/doc/rfc/rfc831
.
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 2:11 PM Dave Taht wrote:
>
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:08 PM Holland, Jake wrote:
> >
> > Hi Dave,
> >
> > You and John have my enthusiastic +1.
> >
> > It's a frank relief to read this draft after trying to figure out L4S,
> &g
mmel did, I simply cannot remember.
I definately want to cite that, and I sure hope I'm not delusional.
> 5.
> Should this must be MUST in Section 4? If not, why not?
>
>New SCE-aware receivers and transport protocols must continue to
>
>
> Thanks guys, nice work and goo
I would love to have some fresh eyeballs on a new IETF draft for the
TSVWG we intend to submit tonight.
I've attached the html for easy to read purposes, but I would prefer
that folk referred back to the github repository for the most current
version, which is here:
https://sci-hub.se/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2018.12.019
--
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
do.
> If you want to use a non-cryptographic hash function, then the
> question is what provable random properties it has. This is also
> discussed in the thesis and in the paper.
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 6:17 PM Dave Taht wrote:
>
> I had been investigating various hashing sc
Jonathan Morton writes:
>>> "polylog(n)-wise Independent Hash Function". OK, my google-foo fails
>>> me: The authors use sha1, would something lighter weight suit?
>
>> The current favorite in DPDK land seems to be Cuckoo hashing.
>> It has better cache behavior than typical chaining.
>
> That
I had been investigating various hashing schemes for speeding up the
babeld routing protocol daemon, and dealing with annoying bursty cpu
behavior (resizing memory, bursts of packets, thundering herds of
retractions), and, although it's a tough slog of a read, this adds a
queue to cuckoo hashing
YEA!
ftp://dmz02.kom.e-technik.tu-darmstadt.de/papers/KBVKS18.pdf
--
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
I stumbled across a patent today (it's safe to look at this one), with
some interesting features for managing a queue in the real world. It's
kind of invasive, but ties in well with the examples of "Red in a
different light".
https://patents.google.com/patent/US9965938B1/en
--
Dave Täht
CTO,
in "Self-tuning active queue management for combating bufferbloat"
http://hub.hku.hk/handle/10722/261457
worth reading just for the math if that's what you are into. As to
whether it's correct, well...
--
Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-205-9740
Based on the carnage over on this bug report:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/9725 and after exploring
various options (I really want the pacing rate to be independent of
the cwnd, but don't know how)...
I'm contemplating two ideas for when fq_codel has lost control of the
queue,
https://www.spinics.net/lists/intel-gfx/msg172981.html
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
Being kind of inspired by all the tricks
https://homes.cs.washington.edu/~arvind/papers/afq.pdf used on the
cavium, I went looking for other smart nics to play with.
https://open-nfp.org/resources/ looked interesting so I pinged them...
from netronome:
"I think it would be feasible to implement
there's so much math in this that I cannot make heads or tails of it.
https://www.eee.hku.hk/~kcleung/papers/conferences/bufferbloat_multi-bottleneck:INFOCOM_2018/PID5170809.pdf
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
"A dynamic overload detector offers more flexibility and improves
hardware efficiency, especially in a complex service such as ours.
With QALM, we implemented an overload detector inspired by the CoDel
algorithm. A lightweight request buffer (implemented by goroutine and
channels) is added for
Does anyone out there actually use fq_codel's ce_threshold parameter
for anything?
--
Dave Täht
CEO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-669-226-2619
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2999575
--
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
http://blog.cerowrt.org
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 8:43 AM, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:42 AM, <ava...@itu.edu.tr> wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I'm trying to implement CoDel-like implementation on Intel's DPDK library,
>> but I have trouble with measur
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 4:42 AM, wrote:
> Hello
>
> I'm trying to implement CoDel-like implementation on Intel's DPDK library,
> but I have trouble with measuring packet sojourn time on RX/TX queues
> because of DMA usage. When I call send() function, DPDK puts the packets
>
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 2:59 AM, Phineas Gage wrote:
> I have two questions about using fq_codel on an edge router when the
> Internet uplink is through point-to-point WiFi:
>
> Question #1: Is it still effective to run fq_codel on our edge router when I
> have a WiFi uplink
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 1:14 AM, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 16 May 2016 at 01:34, Roman Yeryomin <leroi.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6 May 2016 at 22:43, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, R
On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 21:43, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> On 6 May 2016 at 15:47, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>>>
>>> I've created a OpenWRT ticket[1] on this issue, as it seems
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 11:33 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com> wrote:
> On 6 May 2016 at 07:51, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com>
>> wrote:
>>> On 5 May 2016 at 17
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:27 PM, Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com> wrote:
> On 5 May 2016 at 17:21, Dave Taht <dave.t...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Michal Kazior <michal.kaz...@tieto.com>
>> wrote:
>>> This adds a few deb
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 19:25 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> On 5 May 2016 at 19:12, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2016-05-05 at 17:53 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> qdisc
On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:20 AM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
>> On 1 May, 2016, at 20:59, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>> fq_codel_drop() could drop _all_ packets of the fat flow, instead of a
>> single one.
>
> Unfortunately, that could have bad
to fork the fq_codel_drop discussion a bit...
I have up and running two new boxes[1] that are my hope to be able to
test ath10k/ath9k hardware with, for this test, using one in the
middle as a router and a nuc i3 box as the server, all ports pure
ethernet... there's a switch in the way, too.
On
sues (like understanding how to use congestion signalling
>> in gossip protocols, gaming, or live AV conferencing better, as some related
>> examples, which are end-to-end problems for which queue management and
>> congestion signalling are truly crucial).
>>
>
On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 18:43 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> On 2 May 2016 at 18:07, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > On Mon, 2016-05-02 at 17:18 +0300, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> >
>> >> Imagine you are a
On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 10:08 PM, Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 04/30/2016 08:41 PM, Dave Taht wrote:
>>
>> There were a few things on this thread that went by, and I wasn't on
>> the ath10k list
>>
>> (https://www.mail-archive
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Johannes Berg
wrote:
> [removing other lists since they spam me with moderation bounces]
I have added your email address be accepted to the codel,
make-wifi-fast lists. My apologies for the bounces.
The people on those lists generally
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+GlobalHaloPro4UOnXbox360SteamYoutube/posts/XhgJAcdmQ3D
--
Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
Dear Michal:
I commented on and put up your results for the baseline driver here:
http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/rtt_fair_on_wifi/
And the wonderful result you got for the first ever fq_codel-ish
implementation here:
http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/fq_codel_on_ath10k/
I am running behind on this
it is helpful to name the test files coherently in the flent tests, in
addition to using a directory structure and timestamp. It makes doing
comparison plots in data->add-other-open-data-files simpler. "-t
patched-mac-300mbps", for example.
Also netperf from svn (maybe 2.7, don't remember) will
-- Forwarded message --
From: The IESG
Date: Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 9:20 AM
Subject: Last Call: (FlowQueue-Codel)
to Experimental RFC
To: IETF-Announce
Cc: w...@mti-systems.com, mls.i...@gmail.com,
draft-ietf-aqm-fq-co...@ietf.org,
Dear Michal:
Can you take a picture of your setup?
Our intent is to continue to improve the flent test suite to be able
to generate repeatable tests, track relevant wifi behaviors and pull
relevant data back, graphed over time (of test) and time (over test
runs). A problem with udp flood tests
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rasool Al-Saadi
Date: Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 12:35 PM
Subject: [aqm] An independent implementation of CoDel in FreeBSD/ipfw/dummynet
To: "a...@ietf.org"
Hello all,
I am Rasool Al-Saadi, a PhD student at Centre
seen to not be adequately affecting traffic, and the pre-calculated
> 1/sqrt(count) can then be divided by sqrt(2) (i.e., do not rely on the newton
> step approximation for this modification of count).
>
> Cheers,
> --Jeff
>
>
>
>
> /dev/jeff_weeks.x2936
After getting MANY more details as to how oin operated and learning
that Cisco, also, was a part of it... I (as teklibre, LLC) joined.
I'll sleep better, for sure.
That leaves contemplating incorporating bufferbloat.net, cerowrt or
make-wifi-fast as their own entities for another day.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Roland Bless roland.bl...@kit.edu
Date: Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 6:49 PM
Subject: [aqm] Codel's count variable and re-entering dropping state
at small time intervals
To: a...@ietf.org
Dear All,
we (Polina and I) have two questions concerning the
Just when I thought it was safe to flash a router. Honestly. Your
email landed not less than 5 seconds after I finished a build.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 10:49 PM, Jonathan Morton chromati...@gmail.com wrote:
I just put in three quite small tweaks to cake:
1) Codel now has a saturating
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 11:07 AM, Jonathan Morton chromati...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 Jun, 2015, at 20:38, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
Every time Codel triggers the dropping state, it will mark or drop at least
one packet, and increment count by that number. With count decremented
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 10:16 PM, Jonathan Morton chromati...@gmail.com wrote:
I was starting to wonder whether the mail server was on the fritz again.
- Jonathan Morton
that mail server has many problems. It had also been up for 480 days.
In terms of mailing list issues...
There were 27,000
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Jonathan Morton chromati...@gmail.com wrote:
The right amount of buffering is *1* packet, all the time (the goal is
nearly 0 latency with 100% utilization). We are quite far from achieving
that on anything...
And control theory shows, I think, that we never
I reserve comment until after the liquor wears off:
http://www.iaeng.org/publication/IMECS2015/IMECS2015_pp615-619.pdf
--
Dave Täht
Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
___
Codel
Given that initial tests of the Jonathon Morton's new cake (Common
Applications Kept Enhanced) qdisc implementation went so well (115
down/12mbits up of effective shaping on hardware that peaked at 80Mbit
with htb + fq_codel), we are kicking development into higher gear in
the coming months.
To
I note the backport to prior to 3.18 is no longer needed at this
point, I have no intentions of going back to a kernel that old.
Does anyone here care about keeping this working with anything older than 3.18?
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1
was pretty bemused by this thread.
https://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-users/2015-March/003554.html
--
Dave Täht
Let's make wifi fast, less jittery and reliable again!
https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/TVX3o84jjmb
___
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Jonathan Morton chromati...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 18 Mar, 2015, at 17:10, Kathleen Nichols nich...@pollere.com wrote:
How are you relating target delay to bandwidth?
Essentially, I use 5ms as a minimum, and increase it if necessary to
accommodate a couple
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:49 PM, Cong Wang cw...@twopensource.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Dave Taht dave.t...@gmail.com wrote:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=mesos.git;a=commit;h=8b184da431ddf4518691a17eeb75a3ffa04e8603
I don't understand how they intend to use
http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/90/slides/slides-90-rmcat-3.pdf
--
Dave Täht
___
Codel mailing list
Codel@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/codel
The google summer of code ns3 work on codel and fq_codel is starting
to bear fruit. In particular Anh has been working on the classic
bufferbloat model - one stream up, one stream down, one set of
isochronous flows, on an asymmetric network, (example, 20mbit down, 5
up).
Also, the codel module
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Richard Edmands thesir...@gmail.com wrote:
With the tc filter flow hash keys i've been having problems verifying if
they've been installed. I've searched the man pages and haven't found the
solution. It should be tc filter show dev *insert dev*
but that doesn't
What I'd done for torrent was to rely on either a l7 classifier or the
user to mark packets as CS1, (background), and have a 3 level shaper
like yours that distinguished between diffserv classes.
Obviously you can't rely on users marking their traffic
appropriately... and yes, per dest fairness
is
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Alessandro Bolletta
alessan...@mediaspot.net wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Alessandro Bolletta
alessan...@mediaspot.net wrote:
Hi guys,
I'm working on an environment which runs on jumbo ethernet frames (about
1550bytes) and I would ask you if do
Having more accurate dropped information in this qdisc is useful.
Signed-off-by: Dave Taht dave.t...@bufferbloat.net
---
net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c |1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c b/net/sched/sch_fq_codel.c
index 5578628..437bc95 100644
--- a/net
1 - 100 of 140 matches
Mail list logo