On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 12:50:52PM -0600, Matthew S . Hallacy wrote:
> >
> > Best tool for the job. IRC is overloaded and bloated as it is. Cutting out
> > some of the unnecessary features is a *good thing*. Not that I agree that
>
> The problem is that you aren't removing the commands, you'r
What Kev said. Despite smug assurances that emails to admins/opers are
sent to /dev/null, that is the only place that policy complaints can be
directed and have any hope of being considered. In the past I have always
been a staunch opponent of moderation of this list of any kind, but I'm
startin
Hey, I also run a small sized network that is based off the undernet
ircd. I recently developed our own service to perform as a uworld and a
proxy cleaner. I'll post it at www.astrolink.org/uworld4-pl2.tar.gz
-- notnet
On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Martynas wrote:
> Hi,
> We use undernet irc servers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] is for technical discussions relating to the IRC
server software. This is the wrong place for discussions of policy. I
have been tolerant to date due to the fact that these changes are
controversial. That tolerance has just run out. Please take it to a
more appropriate list.
Hi,
We use undernet irc servers network with about 2000 users. There is the big
problem with cloners through sock proxies. Where could I get sockcleaner
service (for checking and denying sock proxy users or something like this)
for undernet irc network ?
Sincerely
Martynas Bieliauskas
>
> Best tool for the job. IRC is overloaded and bloated as it is. Cutting out
> some of the unnecessary features is a *good thing*. Not that I agree that
The problem is that you aren't removing the commands, you're making them oper
only, which equates to more power to the opers, and a less i
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 10:07:21AM +0200, nighty wrote:
> regards ... unless of course .. you are not sure Diemen is .pl15 ;P
How many .pl15's are there?
Amsterdam.* is .pl15 according to it's /version, but I can't
/MODE Run -s (after being opered). I got the CVS 'ircu2_10_10' branch
and it says
how poetic...
- Original Message -
From: "Py Fivestones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 1:47 PM
Subject: Fwd: Re: [Coder-Com] MOTD
> >Well admins and coders, are you happy with the way this network is going?
> >Below is one admin who isn't. Ar
- Original Message -
From: "Perry Lorier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Py Fivestones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2001 8:35 PM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] MOTD
> Hence why we use IRC for chat, the web for storing content, and emailing
to
> leave people
On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 03:28:48AM -0400, Py Fivestones wrote:
> Odd, I thought people used IRC because they didn't want to have to play
> with web pages loading and refreshing. The server list is now a web page,
> MOTD's now web pages, why not just toss the IRCd and force everyone onto
> web b
Odd, I thought people used IRC because they didn't want to have to play
with web pages loading and refreshing. The server list is now a web page,
MOTD's now web pages, why not just toss the IRCd and force everyone onto
web based chat?
Does anyone remember when Undernet was a real IRC net indepe
11 matches
Mail list logo
