The idea here is to protect channels right? A good way to protect channels
are to also protect them from adding a wrong user name via a typo. If it's
easy to implement, why not do it? If it's too costly resource wise then
"we" can say "it's not our problem it's the channel manager's problem"
Isn't
> I have a suggestion for the next version of IRCD. With the actual =
> version, we cannot see others users server.
This is mandated by the Undernet Administrators. Please take up policy
issues with them, and not with the Undernet Coder Committee.
> This's not very cool... And =
> another
So just do a mass remuser. If you were legitimately added, we
wouldn't do anything if you did.
At 12:40 AM -0500 10/09/01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I Agree there,
>
>In the past I have had turkish channels adding me as 450 + in there
>channels without my concent , and then when there is trouble
I Agree there,
In the past I have had turkish channels adding me as 450 + in there
channels without my concent , and then when there is trouble there they
say "Well simba is 450 here" and I look quite foolish.
Would be nice to have some acceptence like stoney said
Simba
