best way to handle would require a way of detaching the suspension from
access list, that way if the access is removed then re-added the suspension
remains (probably require a separate suspension table that would mimic the
access list except only have entries for actual suspensions)
--
xplora is
I still think an added user should have to approve being finally added
somehow - which would solve this problem.
I nearly wrote essentially what you just did Greg but bit my tongue..
Can I re-request that the coder-com consider reccomending that a notice like
-X- ReBELSucks has attempted to add
At 10:55 PM 9/27/01 +0100, you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/09/2001 19:20:24:
>
> > Why not put a code in that sais if a user is suspended, he can not be
>removed.
> >
> > I presume you know that if you have someone on the userlist that is
>close to
> > you, and is willig to "betrade" the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/09/2001 19:20:24:
> Why not put a code in that sais if a user is suspended, he can not be
removed.
>
> I presume you know that if you have someone on the userlist that is
close to
> you, and is willig to "betrade" the other ops, he could /msg x remuser
> #channel use
Why not put a code in that sais if a user is
suspended, he can not be removed.
I presume you
know that if you have someone on the userlist that is close to you, and is
willig to "betrade" the other ops, he could /msg x remuser #channel
username, and then /msg x adduser #channel username lev
