[Coder-Com] bug?

2001-12-11 Thread Larry
i think regardless of how many bans have been set and how screwy they are, if in any of the modes set that one is superior ie *!*~*@*, ircu wont waste time and effort whilst its being set, but wait till modes have been stopped being sent by the client, then it will work out if they are valid, repe

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Dave C.
I tested the original mode commands, and got the same results Tried it a slightly different way (on a different network running u2.10.10pl15: -> /mode #blah +bbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test [16:39:08] *** StoneC0ld sets mode: +bbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread David Taylor
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Kev wrote: > What he has reported is in fact a bug--ircu should not behave in this > fashion. There's a slim chance that it is a bug in his client, but I > would place the probability of that being the case at about 5-10%--no > client I know of keeps track of the channel's b

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Kev
> I was going to reply to the other mails, but I see you understood so there's > no need :) > > The version of the server is: > u2.10.10.pl15. Flanders.Be.Eu.Undernet.org B64eEFfHIKMpStUW I'm afraid that we're not going to really be able to fix the bug in the u2.10.10 series. As indicated in oth

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Kev
> My client does keeps track internaly of the channel's ban list. The > bug has been here for years :P~ Heh, wonderful :) > Test on an ircu2.10.10.pl15 > > *** Server Caen.Fr.Eu.UnderNet.org runs version u2.10.10.pl15. > B90eEFfIKlMopsStW > > /mode #mbutest +bb *!*@1.2.3.* *!*@1.2.* > *** Mode

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Lee H
At 05:27 11/12/2001, you wrote: >Hidden, > >the ban *!~*@* basically is a ban that already bans these 3 below. > >+bbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test > >so there is no bug, its just logic. Yeah, but the bug is the -b gets sent before the +b, thus clients with internal ban tracking g

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread mbuna
My client does keeps track internaly of the channel's ban list. The bug has been here for years :P~ Test on an ircu2.10.10.pl15 *** Server Caen.Fr.Eu.UnderNet.org runs version u2.10.10.pl15. B90eEFfIKlMopsStW /mode #mbutest +bb *!*@1.2.3.* *!*@1.2.* *** Mode change "-b *!*@1.2.3.*" on #mbutest

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Michael Bordignon
true.. i just tried it too [19:15:28] *** Now talking in #sdf /mode + *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@* [19:15:31] *** mick sets mode: -bbb *!~3test3@3test *!~2test2@2test *!~test@test [19:15:31] *** mick sets mode: + *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@*

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Larry
I don't think X is an issue here Mark. =) Larry "Yeah well BEAM this up *PAL*!" - Original Message - From: Mark Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 12:27 pm Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ? > I think the point here is that you cant remove the specific ban i

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Mark Foster
Oh, then i check the banlist: [06:09] [#zonefive] McLean.VA.us +b *!*@grsys1.geomath.fr 3d 13h 26m 44s ago [06:09] [#zonefive] End of banlist (1 bans) (completely irrelevant ban). Thus the only ban by the finish was the one BlakSun removed: [06:08] *** Mode change for #zonefive by BlakSun: -b

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread nighty
At 04:36 11/12/2001, you wrote: >I tried to set up an example and I observed somethign else entirely: > >[16:29] -> *x* ban #zonefive *!~blah@*.aol.com >[16:29] -X- Added ban *!~blah@*.aol.com to #zonefive at level 75 > >Ok, so I have 1 ban set: > >[16:29] -> *X* lbanlist #zonefive * >[16:29]

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Mark Foster
Ok, I stand corrected - Hidden and I were discussing the X ban thing online at the same time as he reported the ban issue, I muddled the two :P I tried it: /mode #zonefive + *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@* [06:08] *** Mode change for #zonefive by BlakJak: -bbb *!~3test3@

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Larry
Hidden, the ban *!~*@* basically is a ban that already bans these 3 below. +bbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test so there is no bug, its just logic. Larry "Yeah well BEAM this up *PAL*!" - Original Message - From: "Hidden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tuesday, December 11, 2

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

2001-12-11 Thread Hidden
hi there, I was going to reply to the other mails, but I see you understood so there's no need :) The version of the server is: u2.10.10.pl15. Flanders.Be.Eu.Undernet.org B64eEFfHIKMpStUW I use mIRC 5.91 and here's the output in telnet: :Flanders.Be.Eu.Undernet.org NOTICE hidd :on 9 ca 1(4) ft