Splitfest ? I just had a nice lagfest (>20 minutes)
68 operator(s) online
Question is: Where are those 68 opers if they don't help users (wich they do
not need to, ok), wich means they would have plenty of time for this.
Graz had another one of the nice bandwidth usage spikes again. If I'm not
w
Yeah, sometimes it seems like X can't count properly. I've seen on
several occasions where X miscounted the number of users in the channel, and
thereby enforcing a floating limit less than the number of people in the
channel, thereby locking the channel. I think this has something to do
wit
Actually, X also seems to have _similar_ problems when returning data
requested with the lbanlist command:
/msg x lbanlist <#channel>
X only returns _10_ bans, but gives the message:
-X- There are more than 15 matching entries.
even if there are only 10 bans in the list.
-stephen
>From: "Hi
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Oliver Keenan wrote:
> Hi Crew,
>
> What's the main differences between the .10/.11 and the .12 style configs?
.12 uses a C-style config file, with a bison parser - it was taken
from Hybrid ircd. Essential, a .11 O line might look like this:
O:*@*.shad0w.org.uk::_S
c-c coders, members and people on this list,
I observed that on #coder-com, 15 users are added to X. if you type /msg X
access #coder-com *, see the result:
[12:07] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* access #coder-com *
[12:12] -X- USER: Isomer ACCESS: 500 LU
[12:12] -X- CHANNEL: #coder-com -- AUTOMODE: Non
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Alexander Maassen wrote:
> I thought the new conf style is part of the .12 tree ? Anywayz, first let's
I meant .12 - typo.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
> Better make it the new .11 style conf file then if you want it to
> be useful for a while.
>
> --
> Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
>
I thought the new conf style is part of the .12 tree ? Anywayz, first let's
make it work to generate old style ircd.con
