> >Then of course you can do:
> > *!*@*.??
> > *!*@*.com
> > *!*@*.net
> > *!*@*.org
> > *!*@*.info
>
> I think is enough to add something only for host/IP.
> If the banned
> host/IP doesn't contain a character a-z, A-Z or a
> digit 0-9 then the
> banmask to be a wrong one. A ban on *!*@*.c* won't
Hi Cosmin,
On Sat, 18 May 2002 01:44:06 -0700 (PDT), you wrote:
> I agree with you but the passwords still can be
> stolen. Mine was stolen
> with the help of Sub7 virus... The result was a ban on
> *!*@*.* on all
> the channels I had access. And now I'm a bad guy in
> those channels...
> Course
Hello.
Alexander wrote:
>Nice idea, but there is one problem. If you have
looked at the
>mailingarchive you would see this problem has been
discussed before
>and noone seems to care about it. Sounds harsch and
is a personal
>opinion. But likely to be a fact.
Sorry... I'm new in the mailing list
Maube X could check a set ban to see how many people it matches and remove
it if it matches more than a set number of users. (maybe even a percentage)
- Original Message -
From: "Isomer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Cosmin Marcu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, May
Actually, the server can check against all the users on the server and if a
ban matches a certain number of users, it can disallow the ban.
Just a suggestion.
- Original Message -
From: "Hidden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dave C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday,
Ack! you and Isomer killed another thread :P
Once again a thread here was dealt with "professional" and served to teach
the less enlightened. You guys are taking all the fun out of flaming :P
stoney`
At 08:33 PM 5/17/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>banning *!*@* has some advantages.
>
>When you ban *!*@*
Hello undernet,
Saturday, May 18, 2002, 3:10:39 PM, you wrote:
ucc> 10mb (much more when compiled!)
ucc> Services as used on undernet and a few other networks
ucc> (by the way, could you make a seperate 'services' category? please?)
ucc> http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/gnuworld
did you sen
> i hope this comes out in plain text, sorry if it doesnt
It did; thank you for your consideration :)
> how do i generate a .diff file from the ircu 2.10.11 source i have modified,
> so that i can have a seperate patch file for patching into furture
> releases/patch levels etc
The easiest way
i hope this comes out in plain text, sorry if it doesnt
how do i generate a .diff file from the ircu 2.10.11 source i have modified,
so that i can have a seperate patch file for patching into furture
releases/patch levels etc
_
Jo
Warning
Unable to process data:
multipart/mixed;boundary="=_NextPart_000_00A5_28C84C5C.E1835D31"
10 matches
Mail list logo
