> Index: ircu2.10/ircd/m_kick.c
> diff -u ircu2.10/ircd/m_kick.c:1.6.2.1 ircu2.10/ircd/m_kick.c:1.6.2.1.8.1
> --- ircu2.10/ircd/m_kick.c:1.6.2.1Sun Feb 3 12:31:46 2002
> +++ ircu2.10/ircd/m_kick.cWed Oct 16 23:56:05 2002
> @@ -187,7 +187,10 @@
> member = 0;
>
>/* Send HACK noti
If i ban a real ip, then if he/she does +x usermode, i would expect
undernet to know they are effectively the same host ... so no one can
evade a ban.
however if i banned a +x host , and then the real ip showed up in the
banlist instead of the +x host, i think this is not good. but i dont
th
James Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Sounds like a way to still find out people's hosts.. Maybe not
> always doable but it would work in theory. Assuming everyone can
> only get one username, why have that in there?
If you want to try to ban *!*@*.isp1 (through ispN) and kick a user t
Hmm, I would not consider this +x mode option to be a way for users to feel
100% seure on Undernet, there are many ways a users real address could be
discovered. This is more like a luxury of being able to change hosts.
That's my opinion.
Cheers,
notnet
- Original Message -
From: "James
Sounds like a way to still find out people's hosts.. Maybe not always doable
but it would work in theory. Assuming everyone can only get one username, why
have that in there?
net wrote:
> No, it's made to make sure you don't just set +x and evade the ban for your
> original host.
>
> Cheers,
No, it's made to make sure you don't just set +x and evade the ban for your
original host.
Cheers,
notnet
Developer, Astrolink IRC Network
- Original Message -
From: "Cosmin Marcu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2002 1:59 PM
Subject: [Coder-Com]
Hello.
Today I found somenthing strange with the +x mode.
After logging in to X and seting +x mode I tried to
join a channel on which my real hostname was banned.
The strange thing is that I couldn't join even if I
had that username.users.undernet.org hostname.
Is this a bug?
JL`
___
