RE: [Coder-Com] Re: [Gnuworld-devel] Re: [Patches] mod.cservice ghost kill code

2003-02-17 Thread Joseph Bongaarts
> presumable [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well) is fine. Whether [EMAIL PROTECTED] not coder-com please :) -GW

[Coder-Com] Re: [Gnuworld-devel] Re: [Patches] mod.cservice ghost kill code

2003-02-17 Thread Dan
Submitting patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (and presumable [EMAIL PROTECTED] as well) is fine. Whether or not the code makes it into the gnuworld cvs tree is up to the owner of the particular module (Gte for cservice, MrBean for ccontrol, etc). Thanks, and keep the patches coming :) Dan Andrew Mi

RE: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread Joseph Bongaarts
Am I the only one who finds it ironic that I'm getting more email about how to stop spam to this list than actual spam? What we have in place does a pretty decent job, and we all know how to do end user filtering if we so desire, so lets just leave it at that. We are doing more work and spending mo

[Coder-Com] Re: [Patches] mod.cservice ghost kill code

2003-02-17 Thread Andrew Miller
Quoting Alexander Maassen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:13:06AM +1300, Andrew Miller wrote: > > > > Attached is the code to kill a ghost logged in to your account, when you > log in > > to mod.cservice. It is designed to get around a problem caused by forcing > > maxlogins to

Re: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread Stacy Brown Thellend
Spamassassin has been installed on the Undernet mailing list server. Many spam messages should be discarded without even making it to the lists now. Everything else now has the header: X-Spam-Flag: Which is set to "Yes" or "No" depending on whether Spamassassin thinks it is spam. You can use th

RE: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread Alocin
Having a closed list accepting automaticaly emails from subscribed users but needing an approval if not subscribed could be done i think... Or, if this needs too much human intervention, an automatic response for pples not subscribed to the list and sending an email, stating 2 choices: 1- subscri

Re: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread Kev
> Would it be possible to have the person making the submission self-approve > the posting to the list (rather than the moderator)? This is an intriguing idea, but there are 2 problems with it that I can see: 1) Making majordumbo support this would probably be non-trivial. 2) Spammers would even

Re: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread Kev
> Last time this came up i suggested DNS based black lists and it was shot > down, so i'm suggesting it again. My ISP mail box is protected by just MAPS > RBL and it is very effectively. The blacklists are politically motivated in far too many cases. Moreover, I'm often the unwitting victim of su

Re: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread Stacy Brown Thellend
I don't think this can be done with majordomo. On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, s gibinski wrote: > Would it be possible to have the person making the submission self-approve > the posting to the list (rather than the moderator)? > > Sorry, I'm not familiar with major domo, but here is what I am thinking: >

Re: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread s gibinski
Would it be possible to have the person making the submission self-approve the posting to the list (rather than the moderator)? Sorry, I'm not familiar with major domo, but here is what I am thinking: 1. Members would post directly to the list. 2. In the event that the posting comes from a non-

Re: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread Valcor
Hello rob.c, On Monday, February 17, 2003, you wrote... > Last time this came up i suggested DNS based black lists and it was > shot down, so i'm suggesting it again. My ISP mail box is protected > by just MAPS RBL and it is very effectively. Or to be even more effective, I had suggested someth

Re: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread rob.c
Last time this came up i suggested DNS based black lists and it was shot down, so i'm suggesting it again. My ISP mail box is protected by just MAPS RBL and it is very effectively. regards, rob - Original Message - From: "Chris Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: S