I suppose it has to do with the following, wanted, behaviour:
+b abc* --> server <-- +b ab*
If the abc* reaches the server first, then the +b ab* needs
to send -b abc* +b ab* to the _clients_ (not the server(s)
on the left, overlapping bans should be taken care of automatically).
Thus, appare
As running on London2.uk.eu.undernet.org
if 2 users set a ban, and 1 of them are on london2 at the time, we see 1
set the ban, then the other remove and reset the ban (from london2) in
the same line. (it gets worse)
if the user we see "resetting" the ban in this way is the one on london2
while
