RE: [Coder-Com] Spam

2003-02-17 Thread Alocin
, - Alocin > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Stacy Brown Thellend > Envoye : 17 fevrier, 2003 16:05 > A : s gibinski > Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: [Coder-Com] Spam > > > I don't think thi

[Coder-Com] WHOIS ...

2003-01-05 Thread Alocin
eived either no answer or some comment asking for solid proof, such thing aren't possible... about all logs can be forged :-I Well, on this point also i promise i'll try it again before anything else. Don't worry, i'm not making a point to create too long mails :o), i'm just trying to be torough. I try to avoid answering to each mail by sending a complete mail responding to each objections. Regards, - Alocin

Re: [Coder-Com] suggestion of a WHOIS modification

2003-01-02 Thread alocin
nnel or your connexion. You cannot informe his ISP to check his activities and eventualy make him stop. You also give the perfect rpotection to pples wanting to do any illegal activities at all... Regards, - Alocin

Re: [Coder-Com] suggestion of a WHOIS modification

2003-01-02 Thread alocin
teward. Anyways, a good day (and a good year to come!) to everyone who's taking the time to think about this. Regards, - Alocin.

[Coder-Com] suggestion of a WHOIS modification

2003-01-01 Thread Alocin
help me free the channels where i am op of those «kiddies-that-didn't-got-their-x-box-for-christmas-so-the-world-must-suffer» type of users... Tank you for your interest.. reply/suggestions welcome :o) - Alocin p.s.: There is other possibilities, like adding a 'join comment' s

[Coder-Com] /msg x help set KEYWORDS

2002-12-01 Thread Alocin
/msg x help set KEYWORDS [00:38] -X- /msg X set <#channel> should be [00:38] -X- /msg X set <#channel> keywords isn't? :o) - Alocin

RE: [Coder-Com] level 500 command proposal

2002-05-18 Thread Alocin
ers... May i suggest that if you intend to continue this discussion, at least specify if you're talking about a ban trough X or as a channel mode, it's very funny to see so many persons arguing but not talking of the same thing at all ;-p - Alocin

RE: [Coder-Com] username in /whois?? please remove!

2002-04-19 Thread Alocin
ah!.. that's the part i didn't know tanks for the info but the idea to advertize it as soon as you login to X remain :o) tanks again, - Alocin > -Message d'origine- > De : nighty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoye : Le vendredi 19 avril 2002 12:03 >

RE: [Coder-Com] username in /whois?? please remove!

2002-04-19 Thread Alocin
> Just a question, not really on X behavior, but on the new way the servers > will hide the username... i meant the hostname ;p

RE: [Coder-Com] username in /whois?? please remove!

2002-04-19 Thread Alocin
uthentification successfull (...) -X- You could now use /hide to hide your hostname Anyway... i don't even know if this is already done... my question is 'how do you intend to make the hiding of the hostname work?' Tanks, - Alocin

RE: [Coder-Com] Ban/Kill with fingerprint

2002-04-18 Thread Alocin
p123.bla.isp.com, we could keep all except the the first part and replace this one by the 'something') and where 'something' would be the resultant of a simple equation on the mac address to get something like 'n789u6nf'... (this letting possible to ban a simpel person, a whole isp, protecting users against DoS, etc...) ... Is that possible? - Alocin

RE: [Coder-Com] RFD: Secondary links

2002-04-11 Thread Alocin
.. what if both 'jumps' occur at the same time? It would be even more problematic because no travelling command could be use to avoid the situation... anyway... some puzzle to solve :) - Alocin

RE: [Coder-Com] RFD: Secondary links

2002-04-11 Thread Alocin
ng term netbreak if 1 hub decide to jump to an other hub but creating 2 seperate groups that way... There must be a checking mecanism ;p I don't know it this if this is 'clear' but if you play with a sheet of paper, some dots and line, wou'll see what i mean :o) - Alocin