Probably should say username instead of account as well. However this
is an ircu message, so I'll cc this to coder-com for them to look at
and think about, personally I'm thinking it might be better to
redirect them to #usernames with something like, "for more information
please join #Usernames"
-
Actually they can set up a sandbox, since the under-pinnings of OS X
is Darwin, which is freely available for download, and is all that is
needed for ircu.
On 12/10/07, Holland Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some time ago I submitted a patch to compile ircu on OS X (which I
> believe it or so
not what he meant...
to add users with access over 500, is the same as lower 500, however
they are not intended for channel based access, replace #channel with
* when using the adduser command ;) (thats no # either) ie /msg x
adduser * xplora 750
remuser works the same way, as well as modinfo, s
doh, sorry
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/10/2006, at 01:50, Carlo Wood wrote:
On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:20:53AM +1300, Whale wrote:
ooohh sorry. 2.10.12.08
Richard wrote:
Hiya,
2.10.12.which? There are some known issues with some specific
2.10.12.* versions that may be the cause of your
Hiya,
2.10.12.which? There are some known issues with some specific
2.10.12.* versions that may be the cause of your problem, so which
exact version you are running would be helpful.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 4/10/2006, at 16:17, Whale wrote:
Hi team, sorry to be a pain.
Was wishing to
you missed one...
how about processing the channels +D/+d state on a channel message
before processing a users Deaf mode status? after all, it only needs
to do this to decide if it needs to send a join to a Deaf user.
personally I like the idea that a Deaf user would see all joins
regardl
OK this thread is making user mode +d and channel mode +d confusing,
since they are 2 very separate modes that do very different things.
Following the differences:
User mode +d stops channel text going to the user
Channel mode +D stop JOINs being seen (initially)
A service bot that is user m
Another thing to think about is, some channels may not like this. If
this idea were to be implemented perhaps a channel mode should be set
to enable it, that way for most the status quo doesn't change.
- Richard
On 22/07/2005, at 7:29 AM, Alyxavior wrote:
Any thoughts on just makin
Here are the list of entrants that you may choose from:
---
* Mitko - http://makedonia.eu.org/coder-com/
* jast - http://jast.heapsort.de/stuff/unet/
* PastY - http://craiovairc.anytime.ro/coder-com/
hmmm 404 Not Found ??
* ViceZ - ht
As running on London2.uk.eu.undernet.org
if 2 users set a ban, and 1 of them are on london2 at the time, we see 1
set the ban, then the other remove and reset the ban (from london2) in
the same line. (it gets worse)
if the user we see "resetting" the ban in this way is the one on london2
while
Thanks
Stacy Brown Thellend wrote:
Yes.. I was trying to figure out how to do it with the new software.
Finally figured it out.
On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Richard wrote:
Wasn't this list closed to subscribers only (to stop all the spam,
while remaining open for anyone to subscribe)??
--
CA
Wasn't this list closed to subscribers only (to stop all the spam, while
remaining open for anyone to subscribe)??
--
CAUTION: This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.
If you have received it in error you must not use, disclose, copy or retain
it. Please immediately notif
On Thursday, Aug 21, 2003, at 13:27 Pacific/Auckland, stoney` wrote:
Hi,
Cservice frowns upon users having multiple usernames. If you suspect
someone of using multiple usernames, stop by #cservice to report the
infraction.
stoney`
or better yet, log it and email it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMA
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 10:40 Pacific/Auckland, Richard Smith wrote:
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 09:03 Pacific/Auckland, L'archange
Eldianel wrote:
My server is ircu 2.10.11.04
and my X is CS6.0 !
I hate to point out the obvious, and i hope someone on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] really can hel
On Friday, Jun 13, 2003, at 09:03 Pacific/Auckland, L'archange Eldianel
wrote:
My server is ircu 2.10.11.04
and my X is CS6.0 !
I hate to point out the obvious, and i hope someone on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] really can help you, but...
CS6.0 is not the X that Undernet has EVER used, for help with that
On Wednesday, Jun 11, 2003, at 12:09 Pacific/Auckland, Gavin Grieve
wrote:
On Wed, 2003-06-11 at 10:00, Tim Ramsey wrote:
Frederik Vervaet wrote:
Will be abused instantly. For example : users on a shared uni
network behind
NAT will have same [EMAIL PROTECTED] thus allowing them to collide other
and may be legally
privileged.
If you have received it in error you must not use, disclose, copy or
retain
it. Please immediately notify us by return email and then delete the
email.
This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by
MailScanner with McAfee UVScan, and is bel
MAXCHANS: bots should always assume 10 channel on undernet, some
servers happen to allow more, and there has been 1 case to my knowledge
where a server admin had chosen to only allow 5 channels. But this
setting is really up to the server's own administrator.
MAXBANS: this has recently been cha
>
> well a decent e-mail client and a little bit of patience on behalf of the
> end user, can easily delete,filter spam.
>
> i have many filters, annoying as they are to set up, but at least it does
> it's job 90-95% of the time. (of course spammers are tricky and that 5-10%
> always gets through
>> opers that have that much time to offer... And he would need to act during
>> the attack, fact that is quite problematic since the pples who are attacked
>> aren't online at the moment of the attack.
>
> how about having in cservice, for each account, the last few logins with
> real nick!user@h
> I still have difficulties about the concept of considering the idea of
> showing IPs to ops on a channel a security breach, but i heard some
> interesting ideas in the few last days...
1. First of all, due to the privacy concerns coder-com really isnt the place
for this, it's up to the undernet
Regents of the University of California
Read the file COPYRIGHT or use the command \copyright to see the
usage and distribution terms.
Run under directory: /home/uworld/gnuworld
With user: uworld ant group: uworld
- Original Message -
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROT
-p
libpq.so.2.0 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpq.so.2.0
libpq.so.2 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpq.so.2
libpq.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpq.so
libpq++.so.4 (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpq++.so.4
libpq++.so (libc6) => /usr/lib/libpq++.so
Richard Simard
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.D.G. FrancoNet
C.P.: 64 Succ.: Cen
3.2.1
PostgreSQL Ver: 7.2.1
IRCU Ver: 2.10.10
PHP Ver: 4.2.3
GNU Make Ver: 3.79.1
Kernel Ver: 2.4.17
Directory instalation: /irc/gnuworld
./configure string:
./configure --with-pgsql-lib=/usr/lib --with-pgsql-include=/usr/include
make string: make
ld-linux.so.2 is on directory: /lib/ld-linux.so.2
> cheers nighty
>
> how about the country thing then?
>
> perhaps put romaniuhhh or canaduhhh on all of them?
>
> just kidding =)
>
> anyway
>
> - wensu
As a New Zealander I can say, sad news is... Like some small ISP's, some
countries can't afford it either.
--
http://www.mediadesign
OK, my apologies, i did not know there was an oper /clearmode
available. i was talking about using /msg x clearmode #channel
where unless something has changed that i do not know about, what i
have said holds true.
--
Regards
Richard Smith
Media Design School Technician
--
http
On Monday, Nov 11, 2002, at 09:51 Pacific/Auckland, The Storm Surfer
wrote:
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 10:52:14PM -0500, Kev wrote:
Little thing: CLEARMODE doesn't remove channelmode +r ...
+r is intentionally left out of the default control string.
how come?
Perhaps because if you can use
that
are not directly involved with Undernet's CService do not have access to a
username's email address.
--
xplora is wakco (Richard T Smith) yeehaa, doggy... b44w00f
Technician, Media Design School Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Official CService Admin,
Undernet Channel Service Committee, Under
> At 23:34 13/10/2002, you wrote:
>> Before we get too carried away, this bug is on the server season`d is on,
>> not diemen.*, and it actually looks like someone has specifically hacked
>> mesa's code.
>
> i'd not worry for mesa* if i were you if its bugged
> it more than certain than its more t
Before we get too carried away, this bug is on the server season`d is on,
not diemen.*, and it actually looks like someone has specifically hacked
mesa's code.
mesa.* is using u2.10.11.02 and I tested and confirmed this from elsene.*
which is also using u2.10.11.02 and doesn't have this bug.
See
mmended to run ircd as root, create a special user to run
it as, then run it.
--
Regards
Richard Smith
Media Design School Technician
--
http://www.mediadesign.school.nz/
CAUTION: This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.
If you have received it in error you must not use,
hmmm:
Channel has 2000 users in it with,
5 ops
5 voiced
Anyone whose anyone knows that if someone were to join that channel from
anything less than a dual channel ISDN line (and probably including) is not
going to handle the flood of /names, and the ensuing irc clients doing
things like /who or
Due to the nature of IRC's client<->server protocol, the join/parts are a
must, but because of the server and traffic load, setting (and in particular
removing) a channel mode to do this is probably not practical, how about
creating a new channel type, that is global (like # and + channels) but is
As inserted:
> From: Valcor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:16:51 -0500
> To: Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser
>
> Hello xplora,
>
> I'm not a very good coder, and have personally not even attempted
Sorry but CService aren't interested, (I know I've been asking for ages, and
I'm on the inside, but you can work around this simply by regularly
monitoring /msg x info yourusername), and I am told that X is already being
"taxed" to much on login.
(although my way around that was simply to add a s
Regarding *!*@*.* see Isomer's email. There IS enough security.
Regarding what to do when your username is hacked on undernet...
First, go to http://cservice.undernet.org/live/ login (if you still can) and
change your password, if you cannot login, use forgotten password (link both
in side bar a
on 30/4/02 08:50, éL NìçoS at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Coders,
>
> I also have a suggestion. Large channels often deal with floods. Most off
> those large channels prefer to put two or three eggdrops online to protect
> themselves against the floodhosts. On most off these channels the banlis
"last modified:" in the user lists and ban lists is letting \'s in the
nick!user@host (usually just the nick where nicks can have \'s in them) be
processed (ie \n is cutting off the rest of the line, most other variations
are at least hiding the \ and code attached)
--
xplora @ undernet
on 18/4/02 06:15, Chojin at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Crowther" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Chojin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 8:02 PM
> Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Ban/Kill with fingerprint
>
>
>> On
mail lists.
--
Richard T Smith - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technician, Media Design School Ltd.
CAUTION: This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.
If you have received it in error you must not use, disclose, copy or retain
it. Please immediately notify us by return email and then delete
, MAXCONNECTIONS);
600:
event_init(MAXCONNECTIONS);
looking to see if i can find out why...
--
Richard T Smith - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technician, Media Design School Ltd.
CAUTION: This communication is confidential and may be legally privileged.
If you have received it in error you must not use, disclose, cop
this has not changed since the old X... you have enough access to remove the
ban on the channel but not enough access to remove the ban in X, result, X
removes the channel, but notify's you that you cannot remove the ban in X.
--
Richard T Smith - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Technician, Media D
dernet, and
all information it may be collecting as well as what it is doing should
never be used for this purpose.
--
xplora is wakco (Richard T Smith) yeehaa, doggy... b44w00f
Technician, Media Design School Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Official CService Admin,
Undernet Channel Service Committee, Under
rops sorry.
--
xplora is wakco (Richard T Smith) yeehaa, doggy... b44w00f
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Official CService Admin,
Undernet Channel Service Committee, Undernet IRC Network.
Note: Unless stated this email is from my own thoughts and opinions and does
not represent Undernet, CService, or Me
is wakco (Richard T Smith) yeehaa, doggy... b44w00f
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Official CService Admin,
Undernet Channel Service Committee, Undernet IRC Network.
Note: Unless stated this email is from my own thoughts and opinions and does
not represent Undernet, CService, or Media Design School.
> F
and the number of reasons why there isn't one out number the reason for 1 by
50 to 1, and they all pertain to abusing X.
wish we could have it, but it is just not a good idea.
--
xplora is wakco (Richard T Smith) yeehaa, doggy... b44w00f
[EMAIL PROTECTED], Official CService Admin,
Und
get the
server code that supports those RFC's.
--
Richard T Smith (aka xplora or wakco on Undernet IRC Network)
Technician, Media Design School
Official CService Admin, Undernet Channel Service Committee
Work: [EMAI
nvite yourself in, i do not see a reason
why we cannot lower the access of the command... however it is not my
decision to make. but i will bring it up. ;)
--
Richard T Smith (aka xplora or wakco on Undernet IRC Network)
Technician, Media Design School
Official CService Admin, Undernet Channel Se
no.
http://cservice.undernet.org/live/ uses php3
--
Richard T Smith (aka xplora or wakco on Undernet IRC Network)
Technician, Media Design School
Official CService Admin, Undernet Channel Service Committee
Work: [EMAIL
g the line "#include "
and instead using this:
#ifdef TIME_WITH_SYS_TIME
# include
# include
#else /* ! TIME_WITH_SYS_TIME */
# ifdef TM_IN_SYS_TIME
# include
# else /* ! TM_IN_SYS_TIME */
# include
# endif /* ! TM_IN_SYS_TIME */
#endif /* ! TIME_WITH_SYS_TIME */
Hope that helps,
Richard
r. Banning works as expected, and for people who want to show their real
host/IP, we have usermode +x to turn off protection (bans on the protected
version of the host/IP still have effect of course).
[shameless plug] Our project is at <http://sourceforge.net/projects/irco>,
for anyone's that interested.
Richard
... and that would account for internet congestion how?
--
Richard T Smith (aka xplora or wakco on Undernet IRC Network)
Technician, Media Design School
Official CService Admin, Undernet Channel Service Committee
Work
52 matches
Mail list logo
