[Coder-Com] channel key

key on the channel, it's not only the ops of the channel that sees the channel key but also the non-ops. Here's what I see from the non-opped client: [12:54] * Hidden sets mode: -k key [12:54] * USP sets mode: +k key That's exactly what I see from the opped client: it shows the key

[Coder-Com] raw 330 (X username in whois) format changed ?

? irc clients are getting confused atm .. and my script too, (easy to fix though). Or this is a 'wanted' change ? I just thought I should let you know. regards, Hidden

Re: [Coder-Com] bug with BAN cmd (level 74-)

/msg X op #chan [nick]. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. Hidden - Original Message - From: "éL NìçoS" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hidden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Undernet Coder Committee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August

[Coder-Com] bug with BAN cmd (level 74-)

P [23:44] *** X sets mode: -o USP [23:45] *** X sets mode: +o USP [23:45] *** X sets mode: -o USP [23:49] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* lbanlist #usp_info * [23:49] -X- *** Ban List for channel #chan *** [23:49] -X- #usp_info *usp*!*@* Level: 74 [23:49] -X- ADDED BY: Hidden (uh) [23:49] -X- SINCE: Fri

[Coder-Com] /kill bug with different versions of ircu ?

Hi c-c people, I asked an ircop to take the nick Hidden` and to kill a friend of mine and here's what I got: [00:30] *** VaL[0Qp] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Quit (Killed (Hidden` (C'est ta conscience qui t'parle. T encore en train d'bouffer ?))) Everything's fine in the quit

Re: [Coder-Com] Resigning as Coder-com maintainer

s in coding and time to dedicate to coder-com but your absence *will* make a difference. Thanks for being what you are, and I hope your wrist problem wont affect too much your other activities. friendly, Hidden [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Isomer" <[E

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

#x27;s the problem ? I don't mind at all giving out this script if someone wants it. You can find me on undernet under [EMAIL PROTECTED] regards Hidden [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Richard Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <

Re: [Coder-Com] level 500 command proposal

n, he can +sntmilk and kick everyone. Theres no need to remove the possibility to ban *!*@*. It's up to the manager to choose his ops. And like Isomer said, it's hard to determine what is too wide. I think we should just forget about making changes on banning *!*@*. regards, Hidden

[Coder-Com] ACCESS cmd

l". best salutations, Hidden

[Coder-Com] bug with the unban cmd

OUTsider, /msg X unban #chan Hidden was suppose to remove only the bans matching the nick Hidden (*!*@*) but it didnt. Coders, There is a bug here. [18:01] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* ban #test-chan *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED] [18:01] -X- Added ban *!*[EMAIL PROTECTED] to #test-chan at level 75 [18

[Coder-Com] X - Automode: OP

Hi there, I just joined a channel (#irc_info) while authed to X: [18:48] -X- [EMAIL PROTECTED] is logged in as Hidden [18:47] -X- USER: Hidden ACCESS: 350 LU [18:47] -X- CHANNEL: #irc_info -- AUTOMODE: OP [18:47] -X- LAST SEEN: 0 days, 00:02:21 ago. [18:47] -X- End of access list X is suppose

[Coder-Com] bug with notice ?

1 ca 1(4) ft 10(10) > privmsg Kuhkjb :UHH :Haarlem.NL.EU.UnderNet.Org 401 hidd Kuhkjb :No such nick > notice Kuhkjb :UHH returns nothing. Maybe that was a known bug, but I still thought it was good to let you know. You're doing a great job dudes, keep up the good work :) Hidden -Ple

[Coder-Com] error in X: Syntax for SUSPEND command

. To evade the problems I got, I suggest we put a $chr(32) between duration and (M|H|D). Thanks for being so attentive to the X/ircu/services codes. Hidden

Re: [Coder-Com] nick/ban/evade

eh looks like it. Like Kev said, its indeed a bug. [21:37] *** edd ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has joined # [21:37] *** Hidden sets mode: +b uh2!*@* [21:37] *** Nick change: edd > uh2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [21:37] bleh [21:37] *** uh2 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has left # (Cycling) (Script/21:37

Re: [Coder-Com] little bug ?

g 368 hidd #eheh :End of Channel Ban List version :Diemen.NL.EU.Undernet.org 351 hidd u2.10.10.pl18.(release). Diemen.NL.EU.Undernet.org :B120eEFfHIKMptUvW Hidden - Original Message - From: "Kev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2001

[Coder-Com] little bug ?

18:12] *** Hidden sets mode: -bbb *!~3test3@3test *!~2test2@2test *!~test@test[18:12] *** Hidden sets mode: + *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test *!~*@* this is not really what its suppose to do/show, it says it added 4 bans, but the banlist is:#uhuh *!~*@* set by Hidden (Mon Dec 10

Re: [Coder-Com] MOTD

how disabling remote motds will reduce the DoS/hacks on undernet servers ? I dont see the need to disable it, I dont see any positive point. We usually do /motd to know the rules of servers (like bots). anyway, I wish an answer to this, like BJ :) Hidden - Original Message - From