Re: [Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

Isomer wrote: > > If people set themselves /away multiple times only the first is > > broadcast to all servers. If I had my way, we wouldn't broadcast /away > > at all :) > Kev wrote: > I recommend storing the away message locally only, making it only > available on a /whois , and using a user m

[Coder-Com] away not updating on remote servers

I notice that when a user sets their away message it propagates to the remote servers. If a user does not clear their away message, but sets it to a new one, it updates on the local server *only*. Remote servers still hold the old away message. (Clearing the away message, and then setting a ne

Re: [Coder-Com] Spam

Would it be possible to have the person making the submission self-approve the posting to the list (rather than the moderator)? Sorry, I'm not familiar with major domo, but here is what I am thinking: 1. Members would post directly to the list. 2. In the event that the posting comes from a non-

Re: [Coder-Com] suggestion of a WHOIS modification

Wouldn't a time stamped log directly to cservice allow cservice to take action against people abusing hidden host? I note that X tracks my real ip/host, and has a valid e-mail address for me. I also note that cservice tracks IP's well enough that single users possessing multiple username's have t

[Coder-Com] Hidden hosts and channel mode changes

Two questions: A. Was u2.10.11.rc.1. going to support hidden hosts via a /mode +x mode change (for authenticated users), or am I confused again? If I am not confused, when would this feature be expected to be functional? B. Shouldn't all channel mode changes appear to come from my local le

Re: [Coder-Com] ACCESS cmd

Actually, X also seems to have _similar_ problems when returning data requested with the lbanlist command: /msg x lbanlist <#channel> X only returns _10_ bans, but gives the message: -X- There are more than 15 matching entries. even if there are only 10 bans in the list. -stephen >From: "Hi

[Coder-Com] Enhancement request

I have noticed that one by one, all of the Undernet servers are moving to new code which masks a users server, prevents us regular users from using the +s mode, masks general server information in routing synch/de-synch messages, and disables the links and map commands. Perhaps there are other