On Fri, 10 May 2002, Alexander Maassen wrote:
> Question is: Where are those 68 opers if they don't help users (wich they do
> not need to, ok), wich means they would have plenty of time for this.
There are only a few opers who deal with routing the
network...purely because they're the o
]>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] ACCESS cmd
> Yeah, sometimes it seems like X can't count properly. I've seen on
> several occasions where X miscounted the number of users in the channel,
and
> thereby enforcing a floating limit less than
iday, May 10, 2002 11:56 AM
Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] ACCESS cmd
| Actually, X also seems to have _similar_ problems when returning data
| requested with the lbanlist command:
|
| /msg x lbanlist <#channel>
|
| X only returns _10_ bans, but gives the message:
| -X- There are more than 15 matc
>From: "Hidden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: [Coder-Com] ACCESS cmd
>Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 12:22:01 -0400
>
>I observed that on #coder-com, 15 users are added to X. if you type /msg X
>access #coder-com *, see the result:
...
...
>
>even if there are no other
c-c coders, members and people on this list,
I observed that on #coder-com, 15 users are added to X. if you type /msg X
access #coder-com *, see the result:
[12:07] -> *[EMAIL PROTECTED]* access #coder-com *
[12:12] -X- USER: Isomer ACCESS: 500 LU
[12:12] -X- CHANNEL: #coder-com -- AUTOMODE: Non
