Re: [Coder-Com] Bug in mainline.

2002-02-26 Thread Carlo Wood
On Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 07:37:03AM +1300, Isomer wrote: > In this case it will not squit. It checks to see if the timestamp is > more than 5 minutes in the *future* not the past, so lag will only make > the test *less* likely to succeed. Ah ok. What about that it seems to KILL the client who cr

Re: [Coder-Com] Bug in mainline.

2002-02-26 Thread Isomer
> While implementing apass1-2, my eye fell on m_create. > It seems that what happens there should be changed. > > Firstly, the last exit_client KILLs sptr, a client. It doesn't SQUIT > the server of sptr. But changing this into squitting the server of > sptr would be at least as wrong - conside

[Coder-Com] Bug in mainline.

2002-02-26 Thread Carlo Wood
While implementing apass1-2, my eye fell on m_create. It seems that what happens there should be changed. The code currently is: int ms_create(struct Client* cptr, struct Client* sptr, int parc, char* parv[]) { ... if (IsServer(sptr)) return protocol_violation(sptr,"%s tried to CREATE a ch