Re: [Coder-Com] IRCU problem

2003-10-26 Thread Chris Crowther
On Sunday 26 Oct 2003 12:23 am, Ian Kumlien wrote: > (I mean, Kqueue is great, but not all servers run *bsd (netbsd has > kqueue now, so that should make it *)) As a general policy we support BSD, Linux and Solaris. The modular event engine is kev's addition, so adding a new polling met

Re: [Coder-Com] IRCU problem

2003-10-25 Thread Ian Kumlien
On Sun, 2003-10-26 at 12:46, Perry Lorier wrote: > Ian Kumlien wrote: > > > > >>Thank you for your report, however, in future can you send bug reports > >>to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll get onto fixing this ASAP. > > > >on ircu universal you get "can't part, not on that channel" so, moving > >the "us

Re: [Coder-Com] IRCU problem

2003-10-25 Thread Perry Lorier
Ian Kumlien wrote: Thank you for your report, however, in future can you send bug reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'll get onto fixing this ASAP. on ircu universal you get "can't part, not on that channel" so, moving the "user has parted" up somewhere in the code + adding a check if it's miss

Re: [Coder-Com] IRCU problem

2003-10-25 Thread Ian Kumlien
On Sat, 2003-10-25 at 17:29, Perry Lorier wrote: > Florin wrote: > >This PART-ONLY flood can be made this way: /part #chann,#chann,#chann, > >#chann,#chann,#chann#chann,#chann,#chann,#chann > > > >Now here comes the reason I mail here: I have tested this command on > >2 networks with hybrid Ircd a

Re: [Coder-Com] IRCU problem

2003-10-24 Thread Perry Lorier
Florin wrote: Here's a log of the issue: *** [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECT

[Coder-Com] IRCU problem

2003-10-24 Thread Florin
Here's a log of the issue: *** [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29] * Parts: nate` ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [01:27:29]

Re: [Coder-Com] ircu problem

2002-07-01 Thread Kev
> i recently installed http://coder-com.undernet.org/ircu2.10.10.pl18.tgz on > my freebsd-4.6-stable server which is colocated.. the install went fine, the > execution went fine, but after running the server for a minute or so, it > started eating resources. within a few minutes it was at 95% cpu/

[Coder-Com] ircu problem

2002-07-01 Thread Ross Palmer
Hey i recently installed http://coder-com.undernet.org/ircu2.10.10.pl18.tgz on my freebsd-4.6-stable server which is colocated.. the install went fine, the execution went fine, but after running the server for a minute or so, it started eating resources. within a few minutes it was at 95% cpu/mem