Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-08 Thread Richard Smith
As inserted: > From: Valcor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 14:16:51 -0500 > To: Richard Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser > > Hello xplora, > > I'm not a very good coder, and have personally not even attempted

Re[2]: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-07 Thread Alexander Maassen
Friday, June 7, 2002, 7:27:07 AM, hidden wrote: H> Hi people, H> I heard some CService people have a little mIRC script that checks on every H> logins if they were added to channels they were not at last login. H> I scripted a script that works really fine. It tells, on every logins, if H> was

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-06 Thread Hidden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 9:04 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser Sorry but CService aren't interested, (I know I've been asking for ages, and I'm on the inside, but you can work around this simply by regularly monitoring /msg x info yourusername), and

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-06 Thread Valcor
Hello xplora, I'm not a very good coder, and have personally not even attempted anything quite as complex as X, or even the ircd, so excuse my questions for appear completely and utterly stupid ;) No offence is intended. My coding experience isn't in this area, but it interests me, so I try to l

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-06 Thread Dave C.
nt: Wednesday, June 05, 2002 8:04 PM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser > Sorry but CService aren't interested, (I know I've been asking for ages, and > I'm on the inside, but you can work around this simply by regularly > monitoring /msg x info yourusername), and I a

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-06 Thread Larry Kaeto
- From: "Richard Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2002 11:04 AM Subject: Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser Sorry but CService aren't interested, (I know I've been asking for ages, and I'm on the ins

Re: [Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-05 Thread Richard Smith
Sorry but CService aren't interested, (I know I've been asking for ages, and I'm on the inside, but you can work around this simply by regularly monitoring /msg x info yourusername), and I am told that X is already being "taxed" to much on login. (although my way around that was simply to add a s

[Coder-Com] Adduser

2002-06-05 Thread Bjørn Osdal JR
Cawders, When a user is 'attempted' added to X, wouldn't it be nice if X could send a notice to the user, if he was online? And if the user isn't online, well, then it could be memorized in X next time the user logged in, sorta like the password notice CService has at present. Something like.

RE: [Coder-Com] adduser

2002-04-22 Thread Casey Boone
if you dont want people using adduser then wouldnt it be easier to just not give them 400+ access? Casey -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 9:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Coder-Com

Re: [Coder-Com] adduser

2002-04-20 Thread Chris Crowther
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Alexander Maassen wrote: > P.S. This looks good with times new roman (non proportional) Minor problem there is that some of us use CLI clients; general guideline, formating is a no-no, we like a our plain ordinary boring e-mail. -- Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther [EMAIL

Re: [Coder-Com] adduser

2002-04-20 Thread Alexander Maassen
(no) | | | ++ | reject add P.S. This looks good with times new roman (non proportional) - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 4:15 PM Subject: [Coder-Com] ad

Re: [Coder-Com] adduser

2002-04-20 Thread Alexander Maassen
, 2002 4:15 PM Subject: [Coder-Com] adduser > hmmm how about add a option where only manager can adduser ? > > friendly NeoWatch @ Undernet.org >

[Coder-Com] adduser

2002-04-20 Thread Ennafii
hmmm how about add a option where only manager can adduser ? friendly NeoWatch @ Undernet.org