I never used to have a problem with gnuworld.
But a recent change appears to have changed the configure script around for
the worse. At least for me, anyway
Now, ./configure is unable to find my libpq++.h in /usr/include/pgsql,
because it *insists* on looking for it in /usr/local/pg
Unless the services clients join the channel, magick probably would not be
the best choice of service for ircu, as ircu does not allow outside clients
to set modes on channels. Servermodes are ok, but I believe Magick does
client modes from outside the channel I could be wrong though... I
I was just wondering..
Is anyone coding / planning to code a proxy-scanner module for GNUWorld?
How about a NickServ module?
; I need a patch for the ircu 2.10.7 to stop the clones!! I make a simple
>program that scan the client machine and if it find port 1080 open he can
>connect to the server!
>
> But I need that the server make this control!
>
>Diego
>
>----- Original Message -
&g
For that ban to work, you'd need *!~*@*.net not *!*~@*.net
For the ban you mention below, the ~ would have to be the LAST character in
the ident, not the first, and it's always the first :)
Hope this helped...
Dave
At 12:03 AM 8/28/01 +0100, you wrote:
>/msg x ban #england *!*~@*.net 333 1
Speaking only as a user of gnuworld and not a coder, I would think it would
take a lot of recoding of the gnuworld core to do that...
Why not just do what I did Make an eggdrop tcl to emulate it Sure,
it'll be annoying getting users to sign up for usernames on a botservice
botnet (in
At 10:55 PM 9/27/01 +0100, you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 27/09/2001 19:20:24:
>
> > Why not put a code in that sais if a user is suspended, he can not be
>removed.
> >
> > I presume you know that if you have someone on the userlist that is
>close to
> > you, and is willig to "betrade" the
I tested the original mode commands, and got the same results
Tried it a slightly different way (on a different network running u2.10.10pl15:
-> /mode #blah +bbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test *!~3test3@3test
[16:39:08] *** StoneC0ld sets mode: +bbb *!~test@test *!~2test2@2test
*!~3test3@3test
At 08:42 PM 1/13/02 +0200, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I am an administrator of channel services on irc.deltanet.ro network and we
>use ircu and gnuworld. I have some questions I want you to answer if it is
>possible.
>
>1. After we upgrade gnuworld we have problems with the users and channels
>databa
Are you using the most recent version of the web interface? If not,
download the latest version, it may set the maxlogins field properly
whereas an older version may not
>Did you set the default value of the 'maxlogins' columns to be '1'?
>
>--
>Alex Badea
>
>Yes I did..
>
>[gnuworld@come
Until something is done about it, here's a tip
I've had issues with someone using this method to impersonate Saralee- on
several occasions, threatening to purge our channel if we didn't give
him/her our private tcl script
Some scripts (like Peace & Protection 4.0*) actually warn you if
When ircu2.10.11 is implemented, we will be able to /mode yournick +x to
change your host to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (or something
like that).
The servers themselves have the ability to autolink to their hub server
when they're split. A bot should not be necessary for this :-) It may
take 5-1
Yes, when you login on X, it will send a command out to the other ircu
servers to set your username on your nick in the internal users
database. Ircu would then use this to create your hidden host. It also
means that if X splits or is restarted, you won't have to login again,
because X will
I would guess that the *!*@* ban overwrote the other 2 bans, since the other
2 bans were covered by the *!*@*, and therefore they were probably deleted
in favor of the *!*@* ban. Therefore, the only ban left in the channel
would be the 1 *!*@* ban, and therefore only 1 ban would be removed. :-)
True, but if someone is abusing the /kill command on people on their own
server, other opers on other servers won't know who is abusing and will not
be able to remove the offender.
That's the problem, as I see it, that the rest of the opers: (a) won't know
who is abusing the /kill command, and (b)
Yeah, sometimes it seems like X can't count properly. I've seen on
several occasions where X miscounted the number of users in the channel, and
thereby enforcing a floating limit less than the number of people in the
channel, thereby locking the channel. I think this has something to do
wit
I agree The ability to ban *!*@* should be either (a) limited to
cservice staff only, or (b) blocked completely to everyone.
In my opinion, 9 times out of 10, a *!*@* ban is considered abusive and
probably used to maliciously lock up the channel.
I don't really see a need to allow anyone to b
Actually, if CService does decide to open the notes system to all users, it
won't add anything more to the login command. If the user being added
is online when he/she is added, send them a notice, otherwise send them a
note. Biggest addition is only in the ADDUSER command, and it uses a
mes
I assume these are normal server<->server pings to keep the link alive?
If so, my main question would be "Are you sure your pong responses are
correct?"
Your pong responses seem to have way more information than the pongs in my
tcl-based services (please don't laugh)...
To quote from my serv
19 matches
Mail list logo