rst resolution.
Resolving the allowing them to set modes whether or not they have ops:
*Remove* the Global Variable completely, you *don't* need it, and change the
if statements to just check whether or not they are an Oper, as above in the first 2
resolutions.
Sincerely,
Chris Gatewood
e # that was given by the server, it's not copying
into the array correctly or something, anyway, any help you would be willing to
provide would be *much* appreciated.
Thanks,
Chris Gatewood
chatsystems.com/. It isn't Undernet's IRCU but they are very
similar.
Chris
--
Chris Horry - [EMAIL PROTECTED]ICQ 18279005 |"Hi there!"
Operations Engineer and Abuse minion IRC Zerbey | ...@/
http://www.wibble.co.uk (UK Silliness) PGP DSA/2B4C654E RSA/A90483ED
&q
ect there's not a jot you
could do about it. In the UK the RIP act wouldn't even let you tell other
servers it was being done...or even talk to a solictor about appealing the
order - big brother is watching you and doesn't want you to tell anyone.
So much for the free wes
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Kev wrote:
> Possibly eventually. The server code is still in need of a lot of clean-up,
> and there are various legal issues that have to be steered clear of.
Namely US export laws (which are still a pain) and France where
crypto is illegal.
--
Chris &qu
Hey All,
Quick Question:
Is there a limited # of clients that can connect to the server? My users are
reporting that only 7 are able to get into a
channel. I havent been able to verify this completely as I wasnt around when
the complaints started rolling in.
Thanks for the server, runs smooth an
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Jonathan Disher wrote:
> Upon doing /away foo, this is what I get back from the server...
>
> *** OK, you're /away now. Hurry back!
Sounds like someone prefers the Hybrid away message.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Mon, 25 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please keep u2.10.10 available somehow, its a totally different program
> than u2.10.11... (it doesnt have all those "Features")
Well it does, they're just configured at compile time, instead of
at run-time, for the
is that you have to make the
source available too.
Does anyone actualy read the GPL?
> SnowKing, RECNet administrator ( /server recnet.d2g.com )
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Kev wrote:
> Quite true. The whole configuration file parsing code sucks rocks; I'm
> hoping we'll be able to do a full roto-till for the next major release
> (u2.10.12).
Am I allowed to mutter things about hybrids conf file parser now?
*g*
On Fri, 22 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Just out of curiosity, is integrated SSL/TLS support on the agenda for
> ircu?
/me looks at Isomer and smirks ;)
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Mon, 25 Mar 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /me was wrong ?
Yes - the question had nothing to do with X.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, BobsKC wrote:
> [1:30] if they do that to undernet servers..
> [1:30] it would be a lot harder to packet them..
> [1:30] a WHOLE lot..
They can however just packet your gateway instead, as he knows
full well.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EM
On Sat, 30 Mar 2002, Aaron Mason wrote:
> i think theres a list for that stuff...
It's called abuse@
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
e cross-talk between the
servers and services to get the users auth'd username (afaik anyway).
> Braden
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
ion code of course).
Of course it should really be documented in the ircu doc/
directory ;)
> Braden
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
ig file catches up.
Is that a hint? I just got up ;p
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
can't
just ban the whole domain/sub-domain on principle.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
're trying to do
something).
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
ose actions except to other channels op and or/channel managers.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, Larry wrote:
> this whois reply with logged in info, its in beta?
It's in the .11 tree, so it's only running on a couple of servers
on the network atm; namely the ones being used for testing.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Sat, 13 Apr 2002, [iso-8859-1] Daniël Boeije wrote:
> I'm getting tired of recieving spammessages WITH html trough the maillist.
> Isn't it possible to filter html-emails?
You can always unsubscribe.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
t's hardly
portable.
#include
int daemon (int nochdir, int noclose);
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Valcor wrote:
> to do with it. Is it just me again?
/me giggles slightly *ahem*.
It was a short lived bug which has been fixed...as soon as the
person who made it noticed in fact.
> - Valcor
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL
lready.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
ers).
The only way I can see of doing it would involve a Client <->
Server protocol change to allow the sending of a FINGERPRINT : during the connection phase...but this would be so easy to fake
(you could just generate a random fingerprint) that it would be
totaly useless.
> C
ll blacklisted?
I'm thinking outloud here :)
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
real ones anyway, the adapter might have a MAC address but
it's contrived; and probably always the same. And if you're using a real
network card you can always override the burned-in address ;)
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, James Evans wrote:
> At least once .11 is installed everywhere we'll be able to hide our
> hosts.. Any info on when it will be deployed?
When we find a mem leak...and fix some misc other items which are
still outstanding.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_&
d be a sort of user fingerprint.
No dice.
> Chojin
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
o give you a
little more slack).
> stoney`
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Alexander Maassen wrote:
> P.S. This looks good with times new roman (non proportional)
Minor problem there is that some of us use CLI clients; general
guideline, formating is a no-no, we like a our plain ordinary boring
e-mail.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Cr
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Kev wrote:
> X is a module of GNUWorld, which is a coder-com-sponsored project.
> Therefore discussion of it is appropriate for this list.
"so nuh!"
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
at to
see if the user is a local oper, they won't see the server name in the
reply, because the remote server can't see their oper status.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Alexander Maassen wrote:
> I thought the new conf style is part of the .12 tree ? Anywayz, first let's
I meant .12 - typo.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
arser. Although be warned the term Alpha
might be a little generous ;)
> //Ozzy
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
ng/able to re-route the network when there's lag, it
stays the way it is until some turn up. Yes it sucks, but it's how it is
and how it's been for ages.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Bas wrote:
> proposal MD5+salt password, feel free to comment on this
I'm toying around with doing this right now, I have a patch for
plain MD5 atm, just needs changing to salt the MD5.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
es
MD5 regardless of whether the system natively supports it or not.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
opers can't be trusted to obey the consesus of logic.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Alexander Maassen wrote:
> Well, why are those opers still present on the network then and don't
> get removed from the ircd.conf ? :)
The P-word.
> Best regards,
> Alexandermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Chris "_Sh
need to be built as DLLs, the dlopen()
code may not work on cygwin.
Other than that, you're on your own. ircu is only coded to work
on a few platforms. And Windows isn't one of them.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Karl Rotert wrote:
> How can I grant oper priviledges to all user joining a channel?
By learning the difference between oper and op.
> --kr
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
can't find the shared library libpq++.so.4, at a guess
I'd say it's a Postgres SQL library. Make sure you have it and if you do,
make sure it's in the runtime library search path...if it's a Linux box
look at /etc/ld.so.conf.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Sun, 26 May 2002, Kev wrote:
> You're probably right, just pointing this out--Iso should have caught the
> change :)
This is why people should keep their cvs checkouts up to date
and use cvs diff ;)
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
the lightweight channel registration
being done by Carlo (or possibly already done, I haven't been paying much
attention).
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
uld be tedious which I think is why it's not done.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
ry to use that as a
starting point.
We will make this Hybrid IRCu! *mwahahahah* - oh wait, that was my secret
private manifesto wasn't it, damn.
> Andreas Louca
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
know if you can log in ircu2.10.12 (I'm assuming he's
talking about the .12 branch anyway); if they'd bothered to read
doc/readme.log they'd know the answer.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Ve
d be a miracle.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9St9fz8bl0gyT/hERAvt/AJsF7ARd1PbcAE2iP38UI2CaoBZmtACg12WR
ocZfur6N6tiELf66kvTmxQc=
=E
on for some people.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9X7D3z8bl0gyT/hERAogSAKCvfc2cwwawx9zhpno1CgxKS43f1wCfdfW/
LLjg8m4Cyx/kdGdFJz
me
as the +k on X is.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9YA0lz8bl0gyT/hERApMtAJ9ZF9XVnNNjMCYvtOHcRuomtWaN9gCg+BOI
O/SG/prSA430iPcDK
t when
they're the only tools you have available, you have to make do.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
think
about it.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9ihCzz8bl0gyT/hERArJGAKDp/5t959qpzoc33Qpl
? don-a-hoe lol woot
- >
> Sue Donahoe
>
at least its midly amusing spam.
so that mode +x can be
set on your client before it's even announced to the network. That way your
host is hidden from the start.
> Regards,
> Ace
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN
only soloution i can see to this is to make e-mail addresses visible
> and then have x enforce bans against them
> From: Entrope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Not a viable suggestion - you're opening people upto spam, mail bombing, etc.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EM
on your
policies :)
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9rwKLz8bl0gyT/hERAh7+AKDfL/rsIYdoeSoumS/hG3+Uhsr0TwCdF
by hebrew ...
That's a problem why? Just put haloween somewhere else.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linu
ever very IRC friendly. It was really designed to be used with
MS's Chat Server, which was just a perversion of IRC.
I loathe MS Chat clients anyway, with their annoying "appears as" crap.
> Tom Rons ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> (http://openircd.org/trons/)
- --
Ch
es hiding the server map entirely
pointless not to mention the fact that it exposes the hubs.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9vjStz8bl0gy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 16 November 2002 12:08, Alex Cruz Farmer wrote:
> This email is fake... Dont send anything back, its very dodgy.
Well duh.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Unde
astle. Not much consilation I
know ;)
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE91mjrz8bl0gyT/hERAn16AJ49+/t+6jzdQmjhSFC61AATRNcprgCfeLqE
ZIOOnyxgSA7S+HDLS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 16 November 2002 23:00, Py Fivestones wrote:
> You can always make [EMAIL PROTECTED] your U@host.
> By the way, is there a character limit on the U part of the U@host? (amount
> of letters I mean).
512 octets.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 16 November 2002 23:42, Chris Crowther wrote:
> 512 octets.
I should point out that's how long it can be in networking terms, ircu
truncates to 9 characters the same as a nick.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_&quo
not getting the replies and thus waiting
for them timeout instead.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE92sjyz8bl0gyT/hERAhNBAKCn1vea8F
ng mschat and use an
IRC client.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
un the ircd.
> =
> Attentamente
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE97GZzz8bl0gyT/hERApuYAKC/CmBdgu8DjfEbWnOW4LoXuzYoHACg6qQG
iqmfX/3kylrl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 18:48, Aaron Catella wrote:
> Is this something that has been discussed and deemed
> necessary?
Yes.
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 05 December 2002 13:31, daaave wrote:
> anything about "rc3" so... But, the entire thing is only 3 lines,
> really it takes just as long to simply type in the changes manually as
> it does to apply the patch. ;)
Speaking personal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 05 December 2002 13:31, daaave wrote:
> # "diff-rc3" format.
I susspect it means diff -rC3:
recursive
context
3 lines of copied text.
I personaly hate context diffs...
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 09 December 2002 17:34, Shogun wrote:
> please tell me if there is any eu undernet server that knows SSL conections
No Undernet server supports SSL since the daemon doesn't. It's not likely to
be something which gets added for Cli
ie about 30
minutes after servers stated running .03.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+D7P0z8bl0gyT/hERAkysAKC9A3DbQeZ0LQD
st set it +i like anyone else would
when they want to control who gets in.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+EBX/z8bl0gyT/hERAu2PAKDqL8frcs6
nnel mode, how do you think you OP someone?
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+EFO2z8bl0gyT/hERAgNkAJ9QCb68cfrpi/LKopA8N7HoC2EaHwCgnnu2
iUGTBL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 10:48 am, Tom Scott wrote:
> What if we let netopers make their own commands on the server? Like...
> /x or /xchan? Would that work?
Why?
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 10:47 am, you wrote:
> Yeah but sometimes clients tend to lock up @ the sight of mIRC code
Screwy and badly written clients aren't our problem.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 30 Dec 2002 11:42 am, stoney` wrote:
> I couldn't reproduce the behavior using Mirc, it may be your script.
No, it's a bug as I've said, Kev has said and Perry has said. I fixed it in
.04.
> stoney`
ay
have more again.
I don't see why an oper would need to be able to add their own commands. If
other networks want to use ircu as a base and have their own commands, they
can maintain their own tree based on ircu...which some networks already do.
> - Necro
- --
Chris "_Sh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 31 Dec 2002 7:58 pm, bas wrote:
> if doing an invite to an invalid channel name, there is no "no such
> channel" reply.
> is this intended?
Yes.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ope
nd it's not something I'd personaly like to encourage.
> - Necromncr
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+FDp1z8bl0gyT/hERAjZAAJ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 02 Jan 2003 2:58 pm, bas wrote:
> if one does /WHOIS on himself and he's +x, show actual user@host actual
> IP reply?
> on other nets with +x theres similar ways to show people their own real
> host in case they want to know.
If y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 02 Jan 2003 4:56 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You also give the perfect rpotection to pples wanting to do any illegal
> activities at all...
That's a specious argument, if law enforcment want information, they'll just
ask for i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 03 Jan 2003 4:54 pm, The Storm Surfer wrote:
> a 'cahannel does not exist' error. Since when? How come? Will this be
> fixed? The RFC doesn't seem to say anything about any channel names being
> illegal.
It's not going to be "fix
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 04 Jan 2003 5:23 am, Tom Scott wrote:
> You're right, but they'll never be able to come on Undernet ever again!
You have no idea how GLINEs work, do you. They *expire*.
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 14 Jan 2003 6:37 am, Daniël Boeije wrote:
Personaly I use SpamAssassin and never see them.
> Best regards,
> KewlKiddo
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 30 Jan 2003 11:20 am, bas wrote:
> this means you must make an ircd.conf file in ircu's "lib" dir. theres
> already an example.conf in that directory. you can base ircd.conf on it.
We really need to fix the directory layout of irc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 01 Feb 2003 7:08 am, stoney` wrote:
> User-com already replied to this email (multiple CC's)
> stoney`
No-one should have followed up to it on here anyway.
*glowers at people*
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ Londo
On Tuesday 04 Feb 2003 5:17 am, stoney` wrote:
> >are any undernet servers going to support ipv6?
It's being worked on.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
On Sunday 16 Feb 2003 1:25 am, Stacy Brown Thellend wrote:
> spams do not get through. I think I get something like 8-10 bounced spams
> everyday that don't make it to the list. Everytime a spam gets through, I
> adjust the filters to make it harder for more to get through.
The ones tha
ble-debug and run the daemon in debug mode (ircd
-t -n -x 3) and see what the last thing it says before exiting is.
--
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 Mar 2003 7:23 am, Marco wrote:
> userload.c: In function `update_load':
Erm, can someone translate that into English?
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 04 Mar 2003 1:19 pm, net wrote:
> it's supposed to be. You may want to change the #include in
> userload.c to #include ?
Having read the translation I'd be inclined to agree.
> Cheers,
> netski
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 10 Mar 2003 11:25 am, peter green wrote:
> mirc sends this way and that is the worlds most popular irc client so no
> net would dare disallow it
I would. I see no problem with loosing Windows users ;)
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECTED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 23 Mar 2003 12:14 am, daaave wrote:
> > LOSING
> GRAMMAR POLICE
Spelling police actually *g*
- --
hikari
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
oper @ London.UK.EU.Undernet.Org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 24 Mar 2003 2:35 pm, Kev wrote:
> There hasn't been much development in the past month.
Mostly because the Senior Coders' real lives caught up with them. Yes, we do
have some. My summer break is comming up at the end of June thou
e to prevent this?
No. There's no way of telling the difference.
- --
Chris "_Shad0w_" Crowther
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.shad0w.org.uk/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+f/JOz8bl0gyT/hERAmisAJ9SUxKyI4rQqMhLVGYskBlQrkKb+gCcD/MO
Sru
On Sunday 30 Mar 2003 1:39 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> And theres exactly the same `issue' for clients rejoining during a split -
> I forget which way around it is but a normal client join and a netsplit
> join are different - one is : prefixed, the other is not.
A lot of these problem
On Thursday 12 Jun 2003 5:43 am, Captain Kirk wrote:
> I always thought it was the other way around. If you set +p, the channel
> won't appear in /list but if you whois someone who "is" in the channel it
4.2.6 List Message
"[...] Private channels are listed (without their topics) as chann
On Thursday 12 Jun 2003 8:25 pm, you wrote:
> Unfortunately for whatever reason this is _not_ the way the current version
> of ircu works. Both +p and +s are totally hidden from /list (it doesn't
> even show a "*" or "Prv" like some older ircd versions did).
I can't see a constructive di
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
