yuqian90 commented on issue #17012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17012#issuecomment-883089001
@uranusjr already explained the differences between these states. I just
want to re-iterate that `none_failed_or_skipped` and `none_failed` are
different. The difference is
uranusjr edited a comment on pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#issuecomment-883067237
The problem is we can’t store the timetable object in db (at least not
easily; it’s technically doable but should be avoided). Maybe we can pre-render
the description
uranusjr edited a comment on pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#issuecomment-883067237
The problem is we can’t store the timetable object in db (at least easily,
technically doable but should be avoided). Maybe we can pre-render the
description and
pateash edited a comment on pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#issuecomment-883062473
@ashb @potiuk @kaxil @uranusjr @ryanahamilton
Please correct me If I am wrong here,
As far as I know we use DagModel object to render dag information in UI,
uranusjr commented on pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#issuecomment-883067237
The problem is we can’t store the timetable object in db (at least easily,
technically doable but should be avoided). Maybe we can pre-render the
description and store that
pateash edited a comment on pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#issuecomment-883062473
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
pateash edited a comment on pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#issuecomment-883062473
> > we can create a base class like DagBase which will have the common
properties, but I think it's a overkill but a better approach so applying this.
>
> The
pateash commented on pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#issuecomment-883062473
> > we can create a base class like DagBase which will have the common
properties, but I think it's a overkill but a better approach so applying this.
>
> The problem
uranusjr commented on issue #10874:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10874#issuecomment-883048540
That would also mean `SSHHook` cannot be re-used though, because afaict
`paramiko.SSHClient` does not support reopening a client once it’s closed. So
if we do
```python
uranusjr commented on issue #17084:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17084#issuecomment-883044707
I think this can basically be fixed by changing `Resources.__eq__()` to
something like
```python
if not isintance(other, type(self)):
return False
return
uranusjr commented on issue #17088:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17088#issuecomment-883032995
Other MSSQL jobs are failing as well
```
INFO [airflow.models.dag] Setting next_dagrun for
example_subdag_operator.section-2 to None
Traceback (most recent call
sudarshan2906 commented on issue #17044:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17044#issuecomment-883026195
@mik-laj Yes agreed, Its not a bug and it is not possible with the current
setup. What do think about disabling it via a config parameter?
Just to not display it in the UI
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17095:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17095#issuecomment-883022861
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
BrunoSerafim commented on issue #13108:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13108#issuecomment-883022450
I had the same issue. And I believe the problem is how the bashoperator
parses the shell script. In the airflow bashoperator code the execute function
tries to run "bash" +
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17099#issuecomment-883016938
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
josh-fell commented on a change in pull request #17099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17099#discussion_r672770679
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1546,13 +1546,17 @@ def inherits_from_dummy_operator(self):
return getattr(self,
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17099#discussion_r672768216
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1546,13 +1546,17 @@ def inherits_from_dummy_operator(self):
return getattr(self,
josh-fell opened a new pull request #17099:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17099
Closes: #17083
- Added support for EdgeModifier in chain() helper function
- Added additional tests in test_baseoperator.py
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
BShraman opened a new pull request #17098:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17098
Added return code check to minimized writing to txt file in every loop.
**This request is just to review below changes** .
I have added two different version for return code check logic.
jmelot commented on a change in pull request #15959:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15959#discussion_r672749007
##
File path: airflow/providers/asana/example_dags/example_asana.py
##
@@ -31,46 +33,62 @@
"owner": "airflow",
}
+ASANA_TASK_TO_UPDATE =
jmelot commented on a change in pull request #15959:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15959#discussion_r672749007
##
File path: airflow/providers/asana/example_dags/example_asana.py
##
@@ -31,46 +33,62 @@
"owner": "airflow",
}
+ASANA_TASK_TO_UPDATE =
jmelot commented on a change in pull request #15959:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15959#discussion_r672749007
##
File path: airflow/providers/asana/example_dags/example_asana.py
##
@@ -31,46 +33,62 @@
"owner": "airflow",
}
+ASANA_TASK_TO_UPDATE =
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 896f351 Add more typing to airflow.utils.helpers (#15582)
add 40595ae Fix static checks after merging
mik-laj merged pull request #17096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17096
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17097:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17097#issuecomment-882971927
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
spire-mike opened a new issue #17097:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17097
I am experimenting with the `LatestOnlyOperator` in Airflow 1.10.15. The
[documentation
shows](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/1.10.15/concepts.html#latest-run-only)
an example dag
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17096#issuecomment-882962763
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
uranusjr commented on pull request #17096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17096#issuecomment-882962480
Beat me to it, thanks
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
mik-laj opened a new pull request #17096:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17096
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for more
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 3234527 Adds oauth libraries to PROD docker image (#17093)
add 896f351 Add more typing to
mik-laj merged pull request #15582:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15582
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
SamWheating edited a comment on issue #11901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11901#issuecomment-882942563
Hey there, I was looking into this issue a bit today and it looks like the
code which deactivates stale DAGs (DAGs which have not been recently parsed)
will never be
SamWheating edited a comment on issue #11901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11901#issuecomment-882946410
But even then, as @leonsmith identified, a renamed DAG will be marked as
active again on the next pass:
SamWheating edited a comment on issue #11901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11901#issuecomment-882946410
But even then, as @leonsmith identified, a renamed DAG will be marked as
active again on the next pass:
SamWheating commented on issue #11901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11901#issuecomment-882946410
But even then, as @leonsmith identified, a renamed DAG will be marked as
active again on the next pass:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #15676:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15676#issuecomment-882943663
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #15749:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15749#issuecomment-882943650
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
SamWheating commented on issue #11901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11901#issuecomment-882942563
Hey there, I was looking into this issue a bit today and it looks like the
code which deactivates stale DAGs will never be reached if the value of
`scheduler.num_runs` isn't
mik-laj commented on issue #17079:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17079#issuecomment-882940772
Cycles are checked by `DagBag`.
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/3234527284ce01db67ba22c544f71ddaf28fa27e/airflow/models/dagbag.py#L429
In this case of `dag.cli()`, we
iostreamdoth commented on issue #17089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17089#issuecomment-882928050
Got it, I got confused with the Operator name earlier.
Thanks @mik-laj
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
uranusjr commented on pull request #17093:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17093#issuecomment-882922088
Oh wait I was wrong, the check failure was tryign to say this PR needs to
*also* fix the documentation. I’ll fix it them.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from d268016 Chore: Some code cleanup in `airflow/utils/db.py` (#17090)
add 3234527 Adds oauth libraries to PROD
uranusjr closed issue #16944:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16944
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr merged pull request #17093:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17093
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr commented on pull request #17093:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17093#issuecomment-882921001
Static check failure is unrelated to this PR and needs to be fixed in
`main`. (How did it get in there in the first place?)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
mik-laj commented on issue #17089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17089#issuecomment-882919242
@iostreamdoth ClusterGenerator from providers is legacy/deprecated method to
generate dataproc cluster configuration. You should use `cluster_config`
parameter. For details, see:
mik-laj edited a comment on issue #17089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17089#issuecomment-882871939
> config generator
DataprocCreateClusterOperatorClusterGenerator class is a deprecated
and we are not adding new features to it.
I think we can extend
iostreamdoth edited a comment on issue #17089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17089#issuecomment-882914685
you mean
`airflow.providers.google.cloud.operators.dataproc.DataprocCreateClusterOperator`
or you mean
iostreamdoth edited a comment on issue #17089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17089#issuecomment-882914685
you mean
`airflow.providers.google.cloud.operators.dataproc.DataprocCreateClusterOperator`
or you mean
iostreamdoth commented on issue #17089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17089#issuecomment-882914685
you mean
`airflow.providers.google.cloud.operators.dataproc.DataprocCreateClusterOperator`
or you mean
uranusjr edited a comment on issue #17012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17012#issuecomment-882907844
I `git blame`-ed this and `NONE_FAILED_OR_SKIPPED` was added in #7464 to
resolve [AIRFLOW-4453]. `NONE_FAILED_OR_SKIPPED` is intentionally implemented
to be almost exactly
uranusjr edited a comment on issue #17012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17012#issuecomment-882907844
I `git blame`-ed this and `NONE_FAILED_OR_SKIPPED` was added in #7464.
`NONE_FAILED_OR_SKIPPED` is intentionally implemented to be almost exactly the
same as
uranusjr commented on issue #17012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17012#issuecomment-882907844
I `git blame`-ed this and `NONE_FAILED_OR_SKIPPED` was added in #7464.
`NONE_FAILED_OR_SKIPPED` is intentionally implemented to be almost exactly the
same as `NONE_FAILED`, but
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #16983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16983#issuecomment-882898678
Cool. Let's close the issue then
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
ephraimbuddy closed issue #16983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16983
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kaxil commented on issue #16922:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16922#issuecomment-882882890
> > Did you actually have a `vivi.json` file so that jinja could pickup? The
traceback you shared is different then the one posted on this issue. Your
traceback says
kaxil edited a comment on issue #17032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17032#issuecomment-882878793
Looks like usage of triple quotes adds line breaks --
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19756715/remove-n-from-triple-quoted-string-in-python
explains it better.
I
kaxil commented on issue #17032:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17032#issuecomment-882878793
Looks like usage of triple quotes adds line breaks --
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19756715/remove-n-from-triple-quoted-string-in-python
explains it better.
I think
mik-laj commented on issue #17089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17089#issuecomment-882871939
> config generator
DataprocCreateClusterOperator class is a deprecated and we are not adding
new features to it.
I think we can extend
potiuk opened a new pull request #17095:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17095
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
Guidelines](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTING.rst#pull-request-guidelines)**
for more
josh-fell commented on pull request #17094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17094#issuecomment-882869245
@potiuk Sorry about earlier. Here is a fresh one. Thanks for your support as
always!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
josh-fell opened a new pull request #17094:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17094
Closes: #16891
Creating an operator to extract data from Salesforce and upload to S3:
`SalesforceToS3Operator`
Items contained in this PR include:
- Operator code:
kaxil commented on issue #17054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17054#issuecomment-882864391
I can't reproduce this on Airflow 2.1.2:
```
❯ curl -X POST -d '{"execution_date": "2021-01-01T15:00:00Z", "conf": {}}'
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17093:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17093#issuecomment-882863316
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
potiuk commented on pull request #16829:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16829#issuecomment-882854356
Unfortunately I have very little knowledge of Dask Executor. Anyone who can
help with it . (and @aa1371 - can you please rebase to latest main)?
--
This is an automated
jzuhusky commented on pull request #16166:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16166#issuecomment-882853853
@potiuk @satishmittal111 @mik-laj
Any updates here? I just ran into this issue. Seems like the fix is done?
Any idea when this might be released?
--
This is an
potiuk commented on pull request #16795:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16795#issuecomment-882853060
Can you please rebase to latest main?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
potiuk commented on pull request #16945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16945#issuecomment-882849125
Can you please rebase to latest main @mgorsk1 ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #16945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16945#issuecomment-882848932
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
potiuk commented on pull request #16980:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16980#issuecomment-882846913
Could you please rebase to latest main?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
ferruzzi commented on a change in pull request #16571:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16571#discussion_r672618235
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/eks.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
+# or more
potiuk closed issue #16938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16938
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #16938:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16938#issuecomment-882846264
Duplicate of #16166
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk opened a new pull request #17093:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17093
The flask OAuth requires oauth libraries and this case is
frequent enough to be added to the reference image.
Fixes: #16944
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
jarfgit commented on issue #8448:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8448#issuecomment-882838957
I'd like to re-open and address this issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
jarfgit removed a comment on pull request #8464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8464#issuecomment-882837234
I'd like to re-open and address this issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
dacort commented on pull request #16766:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16766#issuecomment-882837737
@potiuk Yep, rebased.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
jarfgit commented on pull request #8464:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8464#issuecomment-882837234
I'd like to re-open and address this issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
potiuk closed issue #8759:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8759
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #8759:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8759#issuecomment-882835326
In modern deployments logs are handled usually by the deployment/externally.
I do not think rotating the logs makes airflow Crash (that would be pretty
suriprising given than airlfow
kaxil edited a comment on issue #17085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17085#issuecomment-882834756
cc @msumit -- Sumit has implemented something already for it :)
He will be opening a PR soon
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
kaxil commented on issue #17085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17085#issuecomment-882834756
cc @msumit -- Sumit has implemented something already for it :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from a1d3b27 Parse template parameters field for MySQL operator (#17080)
add d268016 Chore: Some code cleanup in
kaxil merged pull request #17090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17090
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on issue #16979:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16979#issuecomment-882830072
Yeah. Sounds like the third time is the charm
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
kaxil commented on issue #15563:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15563#issuecomment-882826379
Are you sure you deleted the DAG File, as your statements contradict. In
**What Happened** you say that you removed the dag file, but in **Anything else
we need to know** you say
trucnguyenlam commented on issue #16983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16983#issuecomment-882824881
@ephraimbuddy I checked the location of the log, the callback does get
handled. So it is technically working for me. Thanks.
--
This is an automated message from the
potiuk commented on pull request #16766:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16766#issuecomment-882821163
Can you please rebase to latest main ?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
potiuk commented on pull request #17036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17036#issuecomment-882814671
No problem. This happens often too. We move fast! and sometimes the best
thing is to close and apply changes from the scratch
--
This is an automated message from the
josh-fell edited a comment on pull request #17036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17036#issuecomment-882813742
~~@potiuk Would you mind closing this PR? I'll open a new one. Sorry for
really mucking this up.~~
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
josh-fell closed pull request #17036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17036
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
josh-fell commented on pull request #17036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17036#issuecomment-882813742
@potiuk Would you mind closing this PR? I'll open a new one. Sorry for
really mucking this up.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from a4af964 Translate non-ascii characters (#17057)
add a1d3b27 Parse template parameters field for MySQL operator
potiuk merged pull request #17080:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17080
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 1a0730a #16976 Add json.dumps() for templated fields objects: 'dict'
and 'list' (#17082)
add a4af964
potiuk merged pull request #17057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17057
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk closed issue #16992:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16992
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17090#issuecomment-882809521
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
potiuk commented on issue #17012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17012#issuecomment-882808812
Looks about right. For the sake of backwards compatibility I'd merge it in
one IF and deprecate one of those. Anyone?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
kaxil opened a new pull request #17090:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17090
As part of https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17078, a separate `filldb`
function was created which isn't needed as it isn't used anywhere outof `initdb`
---
**^ Add meaningful
1 - 100 of 281 matches
Mail list logo
