asaf400 opened a new pull request #19030:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19030
Hello, I would like some opinions on this PR, it has no open issue,
but it's something I have encountered and fix locally in Airflow 2.0.2, and
the code hasn't change in main branch.
dstandish opened a new pull request #19029:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19029
Currently in the web UI on task instance details page, if a task is in the
"up for retry" state
we will see this message:
> Task is in the up_for_retry state which is not a valid state
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #19028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19028#issuecomment-945033023
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
jgmarcel opened a new issue #19028:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19028
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.0 (latest released)
### Operating System
Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
```
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #19027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19027#issuecomment-945032982
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
asaf400 opened a new pull request #19027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19027
closes: #18874
This PR is an attempt at fixing DockerOperator xcoms behavior,
The fix is keeping the existing attach to docker's log stream for 'live'
airflow logging for long-running
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19013#issuecomment-944452342
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
codenamestif edited a comment on issue #18089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18089#issuecomment-944887234
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
dimon222 commented on issue #18939:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18939#issuecomment-944703655
I'm suffering from same issue too. I'm using MariaDB instead of MySQL. I
wonder if the rest of folks are noticing same pattern?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #19025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19025#issuecomment-944987810
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
josh-fell commented on issue #14319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14319#issuecomment-944921627
I can confirm this is fixed in Airflow 2.1.0 and Airflow 2.2.0.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
kaxil commented on pull request #19017:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19017#issuecomment-944872104
No worries :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk opened a new pull request #19010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19010
Workaround https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17546 issue with
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6: cannot allocate memory in
static TLS block.
We do not yet a more "correct"
harlequin opened a new pull request #19008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19008
This change introduce the authentication method via JWT and also the
possibility to impersonate as DAG owner.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #19008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19008#issuecomment-944235628
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
mik-laj commented on issue #19007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19007#issuecomment-944261431
CC: @ephraimbuddy
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
ss-nef commented on issue #16770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16770#issuecomment-944298277
Hello,
I am not able to understand how to enable the automatic refresh when using
the ECSOperator to orchestrate Fargate Containers.
The container I am running is
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #18964:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18964#discussion_r729789012
##
File path: airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/sensors/wasb.py
##
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ def __init__(
self.check_options = check_options
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18930#issuecomment-944875517
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
mik-laj commented on pull request #18997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18997#issuecomment-944984146
Is Apache Hive also covered by this change?
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18901
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17891:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17891#issuecomment-945024273
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
mik-laj removed a comment on pull request #18997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18997#issuecomment-944984146
Is Apache Hive also covered by this change?
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18901
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
baolsen commented on issue #16770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16770#issuecomment-944336930
Hi there
If you are using an "assume_role"/similar with the aws hook then the
credentials _should_ automatically refresh.
I tested it using normal boto3 clients but
deedmitrij opened a new pull request #19014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19014
- Add creation of Fine-grained bucket for ACLs
- Add patching of environment variables
- Add unique postfix to instances names
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
mik-laj commented on pull request #19008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19008#issuecomment-944260266
What do you think about adding some docs?
https://github.com/apache/airflow/tree/main/docs/apache-airflow-providers-trino
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
PApostol opened a new pull request #19026:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19026
Remove unnecessary string concatenations in `AirflowException` in
`airflow/providers/apache/hive/transfers/s3_to_hive.py`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #19017:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19017#issuecomment-944601010
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
potatochip commented on issue #19015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19015#issuecomment-944584848
that is the standard way of doing it. it is referenced in the airflow
configuration https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19015. It was done that
way for gcp before
pvanliefland commented on issue #18239:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18239#issuecomment-944256151
I'm using the helm chart and experiencing something similar. When using
`KubernetesExecutor` and `logs.persistence.existingClaim`, it works fine. As
soon as I switch to
RobbeSneyders commented on pull request #18934:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18934#issuecomment-944282013
@Ruwann and I have recently joined as maintainers on Connexion, specifically
because it is the only mature API-first Python framework. Let us know if we can
help out.
josh-fell edited a comment on issue #14319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14319#issuecomment-944921627
I can confirm this is fixed in Airflow 2.1.0 and Airflow 2.2.0.
DAG code
```python
from datetime import datetime
from airflow import DAG
from
FurcyPin commented on issue #17507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17507#issuecomment-944311274
+1, I'm seeing task failures with similar messages on Cloud Composer 2
(composer-2.0.0-preview.3-airflow-2.1.2)
I had 2 schedulers enabled and downscaled to just 1 scheduler,
mihaitodor commented on pull request #19017:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19017#issuecomment-944826315
My bad, I somehow misread the example code while working on a custom DAG and
asked Andrew to push this fix. I should’ve ran the example again. Please close
this one and
harlequin commented on pull request #19008:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19008#issuecomment-944249699
Resolves #18969
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk closed issue #18901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18901
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham closed issue #19001:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19001
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
sensei100 commented on issue #17536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17536#issuecomment-944497529
We solved this by adding @gvillafanetapia's workaround in the airflow.cfg
file under the webserver section.
```
[webserver]
enable_proxy_fix = True
```
--
anaynayak opened a new pull request #19022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19022
**Todo:**
- [X] Add `__init__` params for CloudwatchTaskHandler which are passed to
`watchtower.CloudWatchLogHandler` to control whether a log group/stream are to
be created
- [ ]
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #16208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16208#issuecomment-944818126
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 30 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
kaxil merged pull request #19013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19013
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
AndrewSmith593 opened a new pull request #19017:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19017
This change fixes an incorrect parameter name in the "init_container" in the
example dag for using the KubernetesPodOperator.
The current doc has the parameter name as "env", which is
SamWheating commented on issue #18239:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18239#issuecomment-944809282
> worker.abc.com -> Airflow workers (multiple behind a load balancer sharing
logs storage)
I don't think this is going to work, since each airflow worker runs a
sunank200 opened a new pull request #19018:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19018
Add more filter options to list_keys of S3Hook
This commit adds following filters to list the keys in list_keys of S3Hook:
- `start_after_key` filters the any keys after the
ageofneil edited a comment on pull request #18883:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18883#issuecomment-943607246
Are we sure this is working as intended?
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
MM-Lehmann opened a new issue #19011:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19011
### Description
In our use case, we often import data which contains some noise which cannot
be handled correctly. However, we don't want an entire task or job to fail
because of it (simply
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #19015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19015#issuecomment-944475816
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
ldacey commented on issue #18894:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18894#issuecomment-944795288
This impacted me. The one thing that stood out was that most of the
execution dates were from a period I definitely remember deleting. There was a
DAG which was downloading data
Bowrna commented on issue #11913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11913#issuecomment-944458784
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
sensei100 edited a comment on issue #17536:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17536#issuecomment-944497529
We solved this by adding @gvillafanetapia's workaround in the airflow.cfg
file under the webserver section. This solution also works for Airflow 1.10.15.
```
eladkal commented on a change in pull request #18930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18930#discussion_r730226523
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow-providers-apache-beam/operators.rst
##
@@ -76,6 +76,7 @@ Python Pipelines with DataflowRunner
:start-after:
potiuk merged pull request #18997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18997
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #18897:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18897#discussion_r729923995
##
File path: airflow/config_templates/config.yml
##
@@ -195,14 +195,6 @@
type: string
example: ~
default: "16"
-- name:
uranusjr commented on issue #18939:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18939#issuecomment-944973055
I think you get what you see because MySQL lacks DDL transaction, so when
migration failed on line 140, the database is stuck in an awkward state that
the migration is half
potiuk commented on pull request #19010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19010#issuecomment-944334817
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk merged pull request #19023:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19023
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #18997:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18997#issuecomment-944359206
@uranusjr - renamed!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
deedmitrij commented on a change in pull request #19014:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19014#discussion_r730077161
##
File path: tests/providers/google/cloud/operators/test_cloud_sql_system.py
##
@@ -34,27 +35,98 @@
from tests.test_utils.gcp_system_helpers
khalidmammadov opened a new pull request #19020:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19020
This is redundant initialisation as it's super class (Base) does exactly the
same initialisation inside its own init.
Removing to clean code duplication.
---
**^ Add
josh-fell commented on a change in pull request #18930:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18930#discussion_r730258954
##
File path: airflow/providers/apache/pinot/example_dags/example_pinot_dag.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
mik-laj merged pull request #19026:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19026
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
xinbinhuang opened a new pull request #19019:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19019
These code path are dead because both `jenkins_connection_id` and `job_name`
are positional args on the constructor
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the
pateash commented on pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#issuecomment-944879588
> What will it show for 6th param in cron expression? croniter doesn't
follow the convention about it see
kapopken closed issue #19007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19007
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mik-laj commented on issue #19015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19015#issuecomment-944534479
Why do you want to configure the logginfusing connection? This does not
sound safe as every user has the option to edit connections and therefore
damage the instances. Can you
ss-nef edited a comment on issue #16770:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16770#issuecomment-944298277
Hello,
I am not able to understand how to enable the automatic refresh when using
the ECSOperator to orchestrate Fargate Containers.
The container I am running
kaxil closed issue #17085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17085
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
zkan commented on pull request #18931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18931#issuecomment-944927314
@bbovenzi @potiuk May I have your advice, please? I'm not good at designing
a UI and here what I have so far.
![Screen Shot 2564-10-16 at 21 47
prabhjyotsingh opened a new pull request #19025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19025
This is a minor CSS to add padding on the table and paginator. It does not
make or break anything but makes this page looks slightly different from
others.
I've added before/after below
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #19024:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19024#issuecomment-944972806
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
mik-laj edited a comment on issue #18913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18913#issuecomment-941317784
We can still delete a few unnecessary files.
```Dockerfile
&& rm -rf "/root/.config/gcloud/logs/" \
&& find "$(python -c 'import sys; print(sys.prefix);')"
oriolcmp commented on issue #12985:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12985#issuecomment-944295056
Sorry but I don't think it shouldn't be a feature. It is a bug because If
I'm not wrong all operators should be able to use XCom variables. And with this
operator currently this
kaxil closed pull request #18875:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18875
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #18718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18718#discussion_r730107853
##
File path: airflow/models/connection.py
##
@@ -289,8 +289,11 @@ def rotate_fernet_key(self):
if self._extra and self.is_extra_encrypted:
ecerulm commented on pull request #18042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18042#issuecomment-944211690
@ignaski ,can you rebase this?
@uranusjr , is there anything else needed to merge this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
dimon222 commented on issue #18239:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18239#issuecomment-944827298
> By running the workers behind a load balancer, you're removing the
webserver's ability to specify which server the logs are stored on..
I would assume "shared logs" implies
potatochip edited a comment on issue #19015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19015#issuecomment-944584848
that is the standard way of doing it. it is referenced in the airflow
configuration
kaxil commented on issue #18843:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18843#issuecomment-944653584
Yes, we should fix it in 2.2.2 - Scheduler should not crash and instead
handle the `SerializedDagNotFound` error.
@easontm @juroVee !KulykDmytro - Can you confirm if this
codenamestif commented on issue #18089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18089#issuecomment-944887234
@theagilehacker
I was able to reproduce same error:
1. start task from airflow
2. manually stop ECS task from ECS console before the task reached `RUNNING`
sunank200 edited a comment on pull request #19018:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19018#issuecomment-944801148
@potiuk @dstandish @eladkal could you trigger the CI?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
kaxil merged pull request #19012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19012
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
theagilehacker commented on issue #18089:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18089#issuecomment-944992737
Oh nice, I guess that makes sense if you kill it before it is about to load
the container should cause the same issue.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
josh-fell commented on issue #12726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12726#issuecomment-944918034
@eladkal @vikramkoka Following up on this. Feel free to assign to me.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
bbovenzi commented on pull request #18931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18931#issuecomment-944968730
The simplest change would be to set a `max-width` on the `` element.
So the clear button stays closer to the actions. I would also recommend adding
a title above the action
HaloKo4 commented on pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#issuecomment-944498545
What will it show for 6th param in cron expression?
croniter doesn't follow the convention about it
see https://github.com/taichino/croniter/issues/176
--
This is an
kaxil commented on issue #17085:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17085#issuecomment-944872558
closed by https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17100
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
bbovenzi commented on a change in pull request #16931:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16931#discussion_r729075558
##
File path: airflow/www/templates/airflow/dag.html
##
@@ -91,11 +91,15 @@
Schedule: {{ dag.schedule_interval }}
+ {%
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19023:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19023#issuecomment-944980038
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
dimon222 edited a comment on issue #18939:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18939#issuecomment-944703655
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potatochip opened a new issue #19015:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19015
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.0 (latest released)
### Operating System
linux
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
_No response_
### Deployment
eladkal closed issue #14319:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/14319
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dstandish commented on pull request #19003:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19003#issuecomment-944652256
So what's slow about the liveness probe is the import of airflow, which
takes around 5 seconds it seems.
Is the "right" way to do this to add `scheduler-health`
piorkowskiprzemyslaw opened a new pull request #19009:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19009
closes: #16740
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
kapopken opened a new issue #19007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19007
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.0 (latest released)
### Operating System
apache/airflow:2.2.0-python3.8
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
```
RUN pip install
Bowrna edited a comment on issue #11913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11913#issuecomment-944891532
Do we need to include sample code in the airflow/example_dags to add docs?
@kaxil
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #19013:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19013#discussion_r729982570
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/tutorial.rst
##
@@ -182,11 +182,11 @@ in templates, make sure to read through the
:ref:`templates-ref`.
Adding DAG
kapopken commented on issue #19007:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19007#issuecomment-944401814
Closing issue. The issue ended up being a typo which went to our old docker
image repo 2 letter difference. This issue is solved.
--
This is an automated message from the
sunank200 commented on pull request #16821:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16821#issuecomment-944804074
Have implemented the pre-commit hook changes.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
xinbinhuang commented on a change in pull request #19019:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19019#discussion_r730177898
##
File path: airflow/providers/jenkins/operators/jenkins_job_trigger.py
##
@@ -130,15 +130,6 @@ def build_job(self, jenkins_server: Jenkins,
kaxil closed pull request #19017:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19017
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
sunank200 commented on pull request #19018:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19018#issuecomment-944801148
@potiuk @dstandish could you trigger the CI?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
