lwyszomi closed pull request #18879:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18879
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Bowrna commented on issue #19045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19045#issuecomment-946382127
thank you @potiuk for your description. I will fix this and raise the PR.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19036#issuecomment-946378601
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
uranusjr opened a new pull request #19064:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19064
See #19059.
Version parsing capabilities when building provider packages is now provided
by `packaging.version.Version` instead. Non-Python software version parsing
(sqlite) is
ashmeet13 commented on issue #17778:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17778#issuecomment-946369213
Hi @mrbazzan, sorry should have updated here - I am not you can go ahead and
pick this up. My bad.
I did however start on this and you can find a bit of code that I had
kd2718 commented on a change in pull request #19036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19036#discussion_r731487808
##
File path: airflow/kubernetes/pod_generator.py
##
@@ -460,9 +460,9 @@ def make_unique_pod_id(pod_id: str) -> str:
safe_uuid =
andrenerd closed issue #19037:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19037
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19063#issuecomment-946345806
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
prabhjyotsingh commented on pull request #19025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19025#issuecomment-946336910
Nothing new looks broken 爛. "Lint Helm Chart" failure looks unrelated.
josh-fell commented on a change in pull request #19062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19062#discussion_r731459874
##
File path:
docs/apache-airflow-providers-microsoft-azure/operators/azure_blob_to_gcs.rst
##
@@ -51,10 +51,10 @@ Operator transfers data from
josh-fell commented on a change in pull request #19062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19062#discussion_r731459744
##
File path: airflow/providers/microsoft/winrm/example_dags/example_winrm.py
##
@@ -28,23 +28,22 @@
"""
This is an example dag for using the
bbovenzi opened a new pull request #19063:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19063
Update references of "Execution Date" to "Logical Date" in forms and tables
of the UI.
Examples:
josh-fell commented on a change in pull request #19062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19062#discussion_r731459244
##
File path:
airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/example_dags/example_azure_container_instances.py
##
@@ -27,17 +27,10 @@
with DAG(
josh-fell commented on a change in pull request #19062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19062#discussion_r731458987
##
File path:
airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/example_dags/example_azure_blob_to_gcs.py
##
@@ -16,44 +16,33 @@
# specific language governing
josh-fell opened a new pull request #19062:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19062
There is an ongoing effort to enhance example DAGs by setting static values
for `start_date` (already complete for core example DAGs), cleaning up and/or
implementing useful `default_args`, and
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a commit to branch replace-execution-date-with-logical-date
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit babe8fde5a3b17b9b50e1ddbfd21a35031b27ada
Author: Brent Bovenzi
AuthorDate: Mon Oct
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
bbovenzi pushed a change to branch replace-execution-date-with-logical-date
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
at babe8fd Rename execution date in forms and tables
This branch includes the
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #19060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19060#discussion_r731444613
##
File path: airflow/__main__.py
##
@@ -19,20 +19,28 @@
# under the License.
"""Main executable module"""
-
+import logging
import os
import
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19061#issuecomment-946313479
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
uranusjr opened a new pull request #19061:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19061
AIP-39 changed the canonical name from Execution Date, and this should match
it.
I'm wondering whether we should change the trigger page to have _two_
calendar pickers to represent the data
mik-laj opened a new pull request #19060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19060
Related: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19059
Some users are unaware of the supported Python versions and then have
trouble using Airflow. It's best to alert them to be aware of
uranusjr commented on issue #19059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19059#issuecomment-946304173
The `ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'pwd'` error the user gets is
weird though. Airflow should have no problem running on 3.10 (albeit not
officially supported), and the
mik-laj opened a new issue #19059:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19059
### Description
According to README.md - "Support for Python and Kubernetes versions":
> We support a new version of Python/Kubernetes in main after they are
officially released, as soon
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19052#issuecomment-946300363
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
mik-laj closed issue #12508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12508
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mik-laj commented on issue #12508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12508#issuecomment-946298413
Done:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/e25eea052fd54c94b490a377de05c6bae4c24dbb/scripts/docker/install_airflow.sh#L63
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
josh-fell commented on pull request #19052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19052#issuecomment-946294702
CC @dudutch
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 8858309 Workaround libstdcpp TLS error (#19010)
potiuk merged pull request #19010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19010
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #19034:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19034#discussion_r731414520
##
File path: airflow/models/param.py
##
@@ -38,37 +48,44 @@ class Param:
:type schema: dict
"""
-def __init__(self, default: Any =
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19057#issuecomment-946277243
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19010#issuecomment-946275408
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18042#discussion_r731411083
##
File path: airflow/config_templates/config.yml
##
@@ -1358,6 +1358,14 @@
example: "/path/to/my_html_content_template_file"
default: ~
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #18042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18042#discussion_r731410907
##
File path: airflow/config_templates/config.yml
##
@@ -1358,6 +1358,14 @@
example: "/path/to/my_html_content_template_file"
default: ~
uranusjr commented on pull request #16166:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16166#issuecomment-946272873
Continuing in #18042.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
uranusjr closed pull request #16166:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16166
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #16166:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16166#issuecomment-946259427
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17485:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17485#issuecomment-946259391
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #19042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19042#issuecomment-946250086
> Sorry, I think I got you confused. I mean that they should be in this pull
request. Close the others and add the changes to this one
Yeah. Agree those are
potiuk commented on pull request #19042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19042#issuecomment-946250086
> Sorry, I think I got you confused. I mean that they should be in this pull
request. Close the others and add the changes to this one
Yeah. Agre e those are better
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19010#discussion_r731386158
##
File path: Dockerfile.ci
##
@@ -400,6 +400,16 @@ LABEL org.apache.airflow.distro="debian" \
org.opencontainers.image.title="Continuous Integration
jedcunningham opened a new issue #19058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19058
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.0 (latest released)
### Operating System
MacOS 11.6
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
_No response_
### Deployment
ysk24ok opened a new pull request #19057:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19057
Updated `KubernetesPodOperator` docstring to let users use `node_selector`
instead of `node_selectors` because `node_selectors` is deprecated.
---
**^ Add meaningful description
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #19053:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19053#discussion_r731353667
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/tutorial.rst
##
@@ -377,6 +377,24 @@ We need to have docker and postgres installed.
We will be using this `docker
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #19042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19042#issuecomment-946205359
> > > @potiuk @ephraimbuddy @uranusjr I have updated and made the pull
requests. Please let me know if there's another way I can help or anything else
I can do to get
OyinOlamide commented on pull request #19042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19042#issuecomment-946204214
> > @potiuk @ephraimbuddy @uranusjr I have updated and made the pull
requests. Please let me know if there's another way I can help or anything else
I can do to get the
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #19042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19042#issuecomment-946182784
> @potiuk @ephraimbuddy @uranusjr I have updated and made the pull requests.
Please let me know if there's another way I can help or anything else I can do
to get the PR
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18726#issuecomment-946167576
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #18726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18726#discussion_r731311389
##
File path: airflow/www/fab_security/manager.py
##
@@ -1347,20 +1345,20 @@ def _get_user_permission_view_menus(
# include public
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #18945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18945#discussion_r731316602
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/dataproc_metastore.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,673 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
OyinOlamide opened a new pull request #19056:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19056
I am Oyinkansola Awosan, an Outreachy applicant for the December - March
round.
This commit is necessitated by changes made in the contributors set up guide
that needs to be implemented
OyinOlamide opened a new pull request #19055:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19055
I am Oyinkansola Awosan, an Outreachy applicant for the December - March
round.
This commit is necessitated by changes made in the contributors set up guide
that needs to be implemented
wojsamjan commented on a change in pull request #18945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18945#discussion_r728882220
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/dataproc_metastore.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,673 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
OyinOlamide commented on pull request #19042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19042#issuecomment-946156994
@potiuk @ephraimbuddy @uranusjr
I have updated and made the pull requests.
Please let me know if there's another way I can help or anything else I can
do to get the
wojsamjan commented on a change in pull request #18945:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18945#discussion_r728871371
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/dataproc_metastore.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,673 @@
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
mrbazzan edited a comment on issue #16921:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16921#issuecomment-946140083
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
mrbazzan commented on issue #16921:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16921#issuecomment-946155926
@subkanthi Alright
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
subkanthi commented on issue #16921:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16921#issuecomment-946141910
@mrbazzan I should have the PR this week hopefully
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
mrbazzan commented on issue #16921:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16921#issuecomment-946140083
@eladkal Are you still working on this issue or should I pick it up?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
mrbazzan commented on issue #17778:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17778#issuecomment-946137980
@ashmeet13 Are you still working on this issue? I'm interested if you aren't
working on it anymore
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
mrbazzan commented on issue #17815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17815#issuecomment-946135929
@SCrocky Are you still working on this issue?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #19010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19010#discussion_r731283680
##
File path: Dockerfile.ci
##
@@ -400,6 +400,16 @@ LABEL org.apache.airflow.distro="debian" \
org.opencontainers.image.title="Continuous
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #19034:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19034#discussion_r731268063
##
File path: airflow/models/param.py
##
@@ -38,37 +48,44 @@ class Param:
:type schema: dict
"""
-def __init__(self, default: Any
asaf400 commented on a change in pull request #19027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19027#discussion_r731265880
##
File path: airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker.py
##
@@ -328,7 +331,7 @@ def _run_image_with_mounts(self, target_mounts,
add_tmp_variable:
asaf400 commented on a change in pull request #19027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19027#discussion_r731265880
##
File path: airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker.py
##
@@ -328,7 +331,7 @@ def _run_image_with_mounts(self, target_mounts,
add_tmp_variable:
asaf400 commented on a change in pull request #19027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19027#discussion_r731258638
##
File path: airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker.py
##
@@ -328,7 +331,7 @@ def _run_image_with_mounts(self, target_mounts,
add_tmp_variable:
asaf400 commented on a change in pull request #19027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19027#discussion_r731258267
##
File path: airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker.py
##
@@ -328,7 +331,7 @@ def _run_image_with_mounts(self, target_mounts,
add_tmp_variable:
potiuk commented on issue #19045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19045#issuecomment-946100465
Also - following the discussion
https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/CQ9QHSFQX/p1634550158070300
It seems that we have a little "destructive" behaviour of
potiuk commented on pull request #19042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19042#issuecomment-946089644
> Other places you should update too are:
Yeah - would be nice to update those other places too - they give people
some guldelines if their installation fails, so it's
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19042:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19042#discussion_r731242547
##
File path: CONTRIBUTORS_QUICK_START.rst
##
@@ -136,8 +136,8 @@ Pyenv and setting up virtual-env
libreadline-dev libsqlite3-dev wget curl llvm
Aakcht opened a new pull request #19054:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19054
This PR adds parameter for specifying base64 encoded keytab content in
values.yaml. This makes it possible to manage keytab updates with the chart.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
bbovenzi commented on pull request #19025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19025#issuecomment-946066655
Could you also check all hover/dropdowns on the last row of a table?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
hpatel-higi commented on issue #18846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18846#issuecomment-946048322
This is also the other error we are getting now:
```
2021-10-15T04:26:35.894475528Z sqlalchemy.exc.OperationalError:
(psycopg2.OperationalError) server closed the
drobert opened a new pull request #19053:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19053
closes: #18950
- added notes on configuring a `Connection` in tutorial example
- added logging to tutorial example
- used streaming ingest in tutorial example
##
prabhjyotsingh commented on pull request #19025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19025#issuecomment-946041440
Sure hopefully I didn't break anything.
--
ryanahamilton commented on pull request #19025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19025#issuecomment-946038838
Yeah, I think #1 is how it has been, but I agree with @bbovenzi that #2 is
probably the more consistent presentation.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
bbovenzi commented on pull request #19025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19025#issuecomment-946036859
I think option-2 is more consistent. I would just make sure that any
dropdowns and tooltips don't get cut off.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
prabhjyotsingh commented on pull request #19025:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19025#issuecomment-946035643
@ryanahamilton Sure, which one looks better?
Option-1:
josh-fell opened a new pull request #19052:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19052
The `BigQueryToMsSqlOperator` has `template_fields` values for attributes
that do not exist for the operator : `dataset_id` and `table_id`. As a result,
the following exception is thrown during
SamWheating edited a comment on pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#issuecomment-945999217
I agree that `dag_id_ilike` isn't great because it results in using database
syntax in an API request, which means users may expect this endpoint to support
other
SamWheating commented on pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#issuecomment-945999217
I agree that `dag_id_ilike` isn't great because it results in using database
syntax in an API request.
I think that `dag_id_contains` isn't quite accurate because
hpatel-higi commented on issue #18846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18846#issuecomment-945988402
@potiuk so im getting a weird behavior now after adding the keep_alives
args. Parent task in DAG succeeds but the subsequent task that should run
after that task fail.
uranusjr commented on pull request #19000:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19000#issuecomment-945966586
I think we need to offer _something_ since direct database manipulation is
probably not something most of the data pipeline ops have in their toolboxes;
otherwise we
dstandish opened a new pull request #19051:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19051
PR to demo possible process state framework and watermark operator
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
alex-astronomer closed issue #18217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18217
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr opened a new issue #19049:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19049
To conform with other AIP-39 changes. `execution_date` should still be kept
on the class and emit a deprecation warning when accessed (either as a property
or a filter). I think there's mechanism in
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19048#issuecomment-945914095
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #19010:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19010#discussion_r731072454
##
File path: Dockerfile.ci
##
@@ -400,6 +400,16 @@ LABEL org.apache.airflow.distro="debian" \
org.opencontainers.image.title="Continuous
eskarimov opened a new pull request #19048:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19048
## Closes: #14682
Any validation of input parameter, which can be templated, shouldn't be
inside operator's `__init__` function, as its real value will be available at
earliest only during
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18990:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18990#issuecomment-945906366
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19009:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19009#issuecomment-945905585
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
josh-fell commented on issue #12726:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/12726#issuecomment-945895789
@eladkal Perhaps this has already been taken care of looking at the latest
TaskFlow API Tutorial doc (starting
eskarimov commented on pull request #17446:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17446#issuecomment-945894875
I had to make small changes in the most recent commit, as described in the
following issue #14682, validation/normalisation of input parameters, which
could be templated,
ephraimbuddy commented on pull request #19022:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19022#issuecomment-945892335
cc: @mik-laj
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #19027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19027#discussion_r731040585
##
File path: airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker.py
##
@@ -328,7 +331,7 @@ def _run_image_with_mounts(self, target_mounts,
add_tmp_variable:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #19027:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19027#discussion_r731038338
##
File path: airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker.py
##
@@ -328,7 +331,7 @@ def _run_image_with_mounts(self, target_mounts,
add_tmp_variable:
uranusjr commented on pull request #18924:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18924#issuecomment-945874974
Either `dag_id_pattern` or `dag_id_ilike` would work for me. I prefer
`pattern` slightly since `ilike` is kind of leaking the database internals into
the interface, but I
uranusjr commented on issue #19045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19045#issuecomment-945863144
Sounds good to me; assigning this to you!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
uranusjr commented on issue #19040:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19040#issuecomment-945862008
Pickle protocol 5 is only implemented in Python 3.8+ and didn't exist when
3.6 was released, so it's pretty impossible it could be produced if the Python
version never changed,
Bowrna opened a new issue #19045:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19045
### Describe the issue with documentation
I am following the steps in this link to set up the breeze in my machine
https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/CONTRIBUTORS_QUICK_START.rst
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
