vsimon opened a new pull request #19700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19700
When the log group arn contains slashes, the urlparse function parses
the group name as part of the 'path' instead of including it as part of
the 'netloc'. This fix concatenates both the
MaksYermak commented on pull request #19248:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19248#issuecomment-973834629
@turbaszek @josh-fell @mik-laj hi guys, could you look and approve this PR
for merge if all good?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
pateash commented on issue #16911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16911#issuecomment-973827278
> @pateash Sorry, just seen your reply, yes i was trying to update Airflow
from 1.10x to 2.X.
>
> so what is the fix, i saw a merge request
@rajaprakash91 You can
kristoffern opened a new issue #19699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19699
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.2 (latest released)
### Operating System
apache/airflow:2.2.2-python3.8
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #19699:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19699#issuecomment-973803593
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
uranusjr commented on pull request #19640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19640#issuecomment-973792545
Let it try again
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
uranusjr closed pull request #19640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19640
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
rajaprakash91 commented on issue #16911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16911#issuecomment-973781647
@pateash Sorry, just seen your reply, yes i was trying to update Airflow
from 1.10x to 2.X.
so what is the fix, i saw a merge request
--
This is an automated
kd2718 commented on pull request #19036:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19036#issuecomment-973768174
I am getting errors like this one now:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/runs/4248182868?check_suite_focus=true#step:7:2000
I am not sure where to go to debug this. Any
alexbegg commented on pull request #19530:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19530#issuecomment-973761875
This PR is using the same extra names as the previous version of the method.
Once I make the PR I'll link it here. Also I'm a bit busy at the moment if
someone want to
alexbegg commented on pull request #19530:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19530#issuecomment-973758342
Yes, I am planning to make a separate PR to have `get_conn` to allow both
formats, `security_token` and `extra__salesforce__security_token`. This PR
initially allowed for
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #19698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19698#issuecomment-973723520
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
nayanen opened a new issue #19698:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19698
### Description
### Description
I have come across this issue where k8s customer using airflow application.
The pod get terminated when there is brief API server interruption. API server
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch add-latest-git-version
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow-ci-infra.git
commit e6482ee31bf7dc5565f07406f1e7849a2cf241b7
Author: Jarek Potiuk
AuthorDate: Fri Nov 19 04:06:40
potiuk opened a new pull request #44:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow-ci-infra/pull/44
Git should be updated to latest version to handle
--ignore-matching-lines command
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch add-latest-git-version
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow-ci-infra.git.
at e6482ee Add latest git version
This branch includes the following new commits:
new
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new 455ca8f Update to latest
Greetlist commented on pull request #19640:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19640#issuecomment-973677298
It seems stuck at **Tests/ Wait for CI images(pull_request)**, What can I do
now?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #19695:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19695#discussion_r752822542
##
File path: tests/providers/cncf/kubernetes/hooks/test_kubernetes.py
##
@@ -34,100 +32,124 @@
from tests.test_utils.db import clear_db_connections
potiuk opened a new pull request #19697:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19697
The --network-concurrency=1 is very slow and even if this has
been added in #17293 to battle connection refused, it slows regular
builds far too much.
There is a new optimisation in
dstandish commented on pull request #19694:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19694#issuecomment-973646741
> I feel like we should have a test for this too. I can see reversing this
being an "optimization" later on.
reasonable
--
This is an automated message from the
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 49b7e75 Fix failures with recent moto library 2.2.15 (#19693)
add 3336bb6 Fix badly merged impersonation in
potiuk merged pull request #19696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19696
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19696#issuecomment-973639019
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
potiuk commented on pull request #19696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19696#issuecomment-973637934
cc: @lwyszomi
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
potiuk opened a new pull request #19696:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19696
The #19518 was merged while we had false-positive test results
due to testing memory optmisation in CI - test failures went
unnoticed for the change.
This PR fixes the problem (both in
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 84ea55b Add FAB base class and set import_name explicitly. (#19667)
add 49b7e75 Fix failures with recent moto
potiuk merged pull request #19693:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19693
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #19693:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19693#issuecomment-973635612
Failure is for different reason - badly merged PR due to "false positiive"
test results in tests merged. Fixing in the follow-up PR
--
This is an automated message from the
dstandish opened a new pull request #19695:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19695
**Note:** Assumes merge of https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19694
Add config and context params to KubernetesHook
This is mainly needed in order to enable use KubernetesHook
dstandish opened a new pull request #19694:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19694
When using UI form widgets FAB provides a empty string by default for every
param. This turns out to make a difference sometimes. E.g. in this hook, we
decide what to do depending on whether
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #17190:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17190#issuecomment-973498614
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has been open
for 30 days with no response from the author. It will be closed in next 7 days
if no further
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18652:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18652#issuecomment-973498562
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #18707:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/18707#issuecomment-973498520
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19693:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19693#issuecomment-973496301
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19662#discussion_r752746375
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ def post_execute(self, context: Any, result: Any = None):
if
potiuk commented on issue #19688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19688#issuecomment-973465341
@dstandish is completely right.
I already explained that to you ~ week ago @luancaarvalho
https://apache-airflow.slack.com/archives/CCQ7EGB1P/p1636638536256300
If you
potiuk closed issue #19688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19688
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #19693:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19693#issuecomment-973444690
That should fix `main` failures with the most recent moto library (for
example here:
https://github.com/apache/airflow/runs/4256547245?check_suite_focus=true#step:6:12964
potiuk opened a new pull request #19693:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19693
The recent moto library is more picky about parameters
passed to it:
* when you are sending too old logs they are rejected
* when you are passing cloud formation template they are parsed
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jhtimmins pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 84ea55b Add FAB base class and set import_name
jhtimmins merged pull request #19667:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19667
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 2976070 Chart: Remove unnecessary pod_template_file defaults (#19690)
add 952ef90 Support
mik-laj merged pull request #19518:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19518
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
dstandish commented on issue #19688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19688#issuecomment-973358312
@kaxil @ephraimbuddy @jedcunningham if i remember correctly, `airflow db
upgrade` does not load connections.
so i think that's what's going on here. the
dstandish commented on issue #19688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19688#issuecomment-973309647
@luancaarvalho can you document how you set
`AIRFLOW__CORE__LOAD_DEFAULT_CONNECTIONS`? thanks
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #19662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19662#discussion_r752655282
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ def post_execute(self, context: Any, result: Any = None):
if
andormarkus commented on issue #13824:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13824#issuecomment-973286690
Hi @ephraimbuddy
I have tested it with Airflow 2.2.2 and the problem is still existing.
Example logs 1:
```shell
2021-11-18 21:19:01,060: INFO/MainProcess]
seancaulfield commented on issue #18989:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18989#issuecomment-973280537
We also have this issue, but with the `KubernetesExecutor`. Airflow version
is 2.1.4. Seems to happen whenever the scheduler is being restarted by the
deployment.
jedcunningham closed pull request #19691:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19691
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #19686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19686#discussion_r752620097
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/executor/kubernetes.rst
##
@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ Example pod templates
With these requirements in mind, here
eduartua commented on issue #13494:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13494#issuecomment-973251448
@mcgin Could you tell me if you ever go this working?
I'm having the same issue.
Airflow config
```
Apache Airflow
version| 2.2.2
executor
jedcunningham commented on pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689#issuecomment-973242274
This should probably be added after #18249 is merged so we have one less
deprecation to deal with.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 853c164 Clean-up of google cloud example dags - batch 3 (#19664)
add 2976070 Chart: Remove unnecessary
jedcunningham merged pull request #19690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19690
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19691:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19691#issuecomment-973215711
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
potiuk commented on pull request #15947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15947#issuecomment-973213856
@kacpwoja - maybe you can add PR to fix it (unless someone explains why it
WOULD work of course)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
potiuk commented on pull request #15947:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15947#issuecomment-973213231
It does look suspiciously wrong here. I think it will only work is airflow
is run as root
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
zevaverbach commented on issue #18578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18578#issuecomment-973211876
Oh darn, to be honest I think I over-committed. Can you please unassign me?
On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 6:53 PM eladkal ***@***.***> wrote:
> @zevaverbach
jedcunningham opened a new pull request #19691:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19691
Removes extra noise and actually mounts ``airflow.cfg``.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from bd109b4 Fix: Do not render undefined graph edges (#19684)
add 853c164 Clean-up of google cloud example dags -
potiuk merged pull request #19664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19664
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #19592:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19592#issuecomment-973201742
I'd feel safer if it is rebased again after the fix from Ash :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
potiuk commented on issue #19217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19217#issuecomment-973200468
As pointed out above:
> This is already possibly via _CMD and _SECRET env variable. See
https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/howto/set-config.html
potiuk commented on issue #13942:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13942#issuecomment-973198779
Oh yeah. It is :exploding_head: especially that for example MacOS has their
own rules on which ones are loaded when as well.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689#discussion_r752565596
##
File path: chart/values.schema.json
##
@@ -2856,6 +2856,11 @@
"type": "array",
"default": []
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689#discussion_r752565596
##
File path: chart/values.schema.json
##
@@ -2856,6 +2856,11 @@
"type": "array",
"default": []
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689#discussion_r752564631
##
File path: chart/values.schema.json
##
@@ -2856,6 +2856,11 @@
"type": "array",
"default": []
tomasgatial commented on a change in pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689#discussion_r752560842
##
File path: chart/values.schema.json
##
@@ -2856,6 +2856,11 @@
"type": "array",
"default": []
tomasgatial commented on a change in pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689#discussion_r752560842
##
File path: chart/values.schema.json
##
@@ -2856,6 +2856,11 @@
"type": "array",
"default": []
tomasgatial commented on a change in pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689#discussion_r752560842
##
File path: chart/values.schema.json
##
@@ -2856,6 +2856,11 @@
"type": "array",
"default": []
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19662#discussion_r752556309
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ def post_execute(self, context: Any, result: Any = None):
if
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19662#discussion_r752556309
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ def post_execute(self, context: Any, result: Any = None):
if
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19662#discussion_r752556309
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ def post_execute(self, context: Any, result: Any = None):
if
brosenkrantz commented on issue #17507:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17507#issuecomment-973177410
I found that I change aiflow.cfg **default_impersonation = myuser**.
When I set it back to default **default_impersonation=** this issue is
resolved for me in Airflow
potiuk commented on pull request #19637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19637#issuecomment-973176367
> Collin works with us :) We were both debugging the same issue after 2.2.0
-- but that's what I think that is it just one isolated issue in 2 years that
happened with 2.2.0.
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #19662:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19662#discussion_r752549672
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1000,7 +1000,7 @@ def post_execute(self, context: Any, result: Any = None):
if
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19690#issuecomment-973173155
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
collinmcnulty edited a comment on pull request #19637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19637#issuecomment-973172102
I unfortunately do not have logs. I have encountered three kinds of
scenarios where clearing the serialized dag representations was required, but
the latter two
collinmcnulty commented on pull request #19637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19637#issuecomment-973172102
I unfortunately do not have logs. I have encountered three kinds of
scenarios where clearing the serialized dag representations was required, but
the latter two seem to
jedcunningham opened a new pull request #19690:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19690
We don't need to set these in `pod_template_file`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689#discussion_r752542302
##
File path: chart/values.schema.json
##
@@ -2856,6 +2856,11 @@
"type": "array",
"default": []
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689#discussion_r752542302
##
File path: chart/values.schema.json
##
@@ -2856,6 +2856,11 @@
"type": "array",
"default": []
kaxil edited a comment on pull request #19637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19637#issuecomment-973165667
> > Can you give some examples of this please except for the 2.2.0 issue
where just reserializing would have helped
>
> Yep. It all started with this: #19519 for
kaxil commented on pull request #19637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19637#issuecomment-973165667
> > Can you give some examples of this please except for the 2.2.0 issue
where just reserializing would have helped
>
> Yep. It all started with this: #19519 for example.
davidavdav commented on a change in pull request #19683:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19683#discussion_r752533080
##
File path: airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
##
@@ -444,14 +446,14 @@ class DependencyDetector:
@staticmethod
def
o-nikolas commented on issue #15279:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/15279#issuecomment-973159337
I cut [an issue](https://github.com/kislyuk/watchtower/issues/154) to the
watchtower repo (since the other was closed) with some possible fixes I had
tested. But it seems like
tomasgatial commented on issue #19681:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19681#issuecomment-973158960
Sure, here comes. @potiuk thanks for encouragement!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689#issuecomment-973157587
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
tomasgatial opened a new pull request #19689:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19689
closes: #19681
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
luancaarvalho commented on issue #19688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19688#issuecomment-973147184
Tagging you guys.
@kaxil @dstandish
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
luancaarvalho opened a new issue #19688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19688
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.1
### Operating System
linux
### Versions of Apache Airflow Providers
_No response_
### Deployment
Official Apache
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #19688:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19688#issuecomment-973146163
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19686#discussion_r752508035
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/executor/kubernetes.rst
##
@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ Example pod templates
With these requirements in mind, here are some
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #19686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19686#discussion_r752508035
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/executor/kubernetes.rst
##
@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ Example pod templates
With these requirements in mind, here are some
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #19637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19637#issuecomment-973129528
> Can you give some examples of this please except for the 2.2.0 issue where
just reserializing would have helped
Yep. It all started with this:
potiuk commented on pull request #19637:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19637#issuecomment-973129528
> Can you give some examples of this please except for the 2.2.0 issue where
just reserializing would have helped
Yep. It all started with this:
jedcunningham commented on a change in pull request #19686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19686#discussion_r752499335
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/executor/kubernetes.rst
##
@@ -91,6 +91,14 @@ Example pod templates
With these requirements in mind, here
dstandish commented on pull request #19530:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19530#issuecomment-973116793
I totally feel your pain. I do not like the decision. My very uninformed
guess is that more often than not creds are not managed in UI and I would
prefer if we never
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #19686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19686#issuecomment-973115053
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
1 - 100 of 309 matches
Mail list logo
