uranusjr commented on pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#issuecomment-1015152810
Seems to be working. If the latest two commits look good to you @ashb this
is ready to go in.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
benbenbang edited a comment on issue #9713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9713#issuecomment-1015142652
Hello @dstandish
Sorry for the late reply. In 1.10x, if I remember correctly, I found that
changing the backend would also change how airflow got a variable from
benbenbang commented on issue #9713:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9713#issuecomment-1015142652
Hello @dstandish
Sorry for the late reply. In 1.10x, if I remember correctly, I found that
changing the backend would also change how airflow got the meta store.
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #20900:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20900#discussion_r786476750
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/schemas/dag_schema.py
##
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ class DAGDetailSchema(DAGSchema):
timezone = TimezoneField()
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #20900:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20900#discussion_r786475358
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/role_and_permission_endpoint.py
##
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ def post_role() -> APIResponse:
if not
mashirali opened a new issue #20915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20915
### Apache Airflow version
2.2.3 (latest released)
### What happened
i have run the ./breeze setup-autocomplete
then i ran source ~/.bash_completion.d/breeze-complete
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #20915:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20915#issuecomment-1015134815
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786430565
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ def apply_defaults(self: "BaseOperator", *args: Any,
**kwargs: Any) -> Any:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20881#issuecomment-1015073007
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20881:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20881#discussion_r786416813
##
File path: tests/models/test_dagbag.py
##
@@ -44,19 +44,20 @@
from tests.test_utils import db
from tests.test_utils.asserts import
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #20664:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20664#discussion_r786415816
##
File path: scripts/ci/libraries/_build_images.sh
##
@@ -800,6 +624,12 @@ function build_images::build_prod_images() {
echo
exit 1
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new fce46e6 Uses CI images built in previous step
uranusjr merged pull request #20889:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20889
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 7e29506 Switch to new MySQL public key (#20912)
add 66276e6 Switch map_index back to use server_default
uranusjr merged pull request #20902:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20902
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr closed issue #20876:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20876
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20902:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20902#discussion_r786414827
##
File path: airflow/models/taskinstance.py
##
@@ -343,7 +344,7 @@ class TaskInstance(Base, LoggingMixin):
task_id = Column(String(ID_LEN,
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #20914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20914#issuecomment-1015069052
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
amansehgal-ccx opened a new issue #20914:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20914
### Apache Airflow version
2.0.2
### What happened
On updating the requirements.txt with jdbc(apache-airflow-providers-jdbc)
driver, I restarted the airflow service. The
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910#discussion_r786406375
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -86,9 +85,8 @@ install_requires =
blinker
cached_property~=1.5;python_version<="3.7"
cattrs~=1.1, !=1.7.*
uranusjr commented on issue #16764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16764#issuecomment-1015058864
One way I can think of to get rid of all the complexity is to _prohibit_ the
task group from being used before the context manager exits, i.e.
```python
with
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910#discussion_r786401696
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -86,9 +86,8 @@ install_requires =
blinker
cached_property~=1.5;python_version<="3.7"
cattrs~=1.1, !=1.7.*
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20889:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20889#issuecomment-1015051790
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910#issuecomment-1015049354
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
mik-laj commented on pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910#issuecomment-1015049048
> Any other tests/expecrations for the connexion/API ?
I think this part of the project has pretty good test coverage and we can
rely on it.
--
This is an automated
mik-laj commented on a change in pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910#discussion_r786397877
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -86,9 +85,8 @@ install_requires =
blinker
cached_property~=1.5;python_version<="3.7"
cattrs~=1.1, !=1.7.*
edithturn opened a new pull request #20913:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20913
Rewrite testing examples of images in python
* ci_test_examples_of_prod_image_building.py instead of
ci_test_examples_of_prod_image_building.sh
* Calling it the workflow ci.yml
NadimYounes commented on issue #20911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20911#issuecomment-1015044192
@potiuk confirming that this now works on `2.0.2`.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 7e29506 Switch to new MySQL public key
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912#issuecomment-1015042665
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
mik-laj closed issue #20911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20911
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mik-laj merged pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
eduardchai commented on issue #18041:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/18041#issuecomment-1015039319
@ephraimbuddy it does reduce the number of errors by a lot! Thank you! There
are some errors where the jobs are stuck in `queued` state, but I think it
should be solvable by
edithturn commented on a change in pull request #20763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20763#discussion_r786384657
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_resource_check.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software
edithturn commented on a change in pull request #20763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20763#discussion_r786384657
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_resource_check.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software
edithturn commented on a change in pull request #20763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20763#discussion_r786384657
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_resource_check.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software
NadimYounes commented on issue #20911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20911#issuecomment-1015000693
@potiuk Sure. I will check in a couple hours and let you know. Thanks
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on
potiuk commented on issue #20911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20911#issuecomment-1014998226
Most of the images 2.1.1+ are refreshed now (I will refresh even older
images - down to 2.0.0). Can you please @NadimYounes verify that your image
works after refresh (I see that
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912#issuecomment-1014995400
If any committer approves it - please merge it. This is needed to stop
PRs/main builds from failing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
potiuk commented on pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912#issuecomment-1014995400
If ny committer approves it - please merge it. This is needed to stop
PRs/main builds from failing
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #20763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20763#discussion_r786340660
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_resource_check.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #20763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20763#discussion_r786340660
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_resource_check.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #20763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20763#discussion_r786340660
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_resource_check.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20005:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20005#issuecomment-1014965109
This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not
had recent activity. It will be closed in 5 days if no further activity occurs.
Thank
edithturn commented on a change in pull request #20763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20763#discussion_r786334446
##
File path: scripts/in_container/run_resource_check.py
##
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env python
+
+
+# Licensed to the Apache Software
edithturn commented on a change in pull request #20763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20763#discussion_r786334200
##
File path: dev/breeze/doc/BREEZE.md
##
@@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912#issuecomment-1014946516
Note. I will also need to (doing it now) rebuild past released docker images
to allow people to extend those (apt-get update fails without the key) (only
2.* images as
alex-astronomer commented on issue #17686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17686#issuecomment-1014955770
Yes I am, should have more time this coming week to get in a PR. Thanks for
your patience.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
potiuk commented on pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912#issuecomment-1014955521
> Will the DockerHub images be updated with this fix? I'm having issues with
`dockerhub.docker.artifactory.viasat.com/apache/airflow:1.10.15-python3.6` due
to the key change.
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912#issuecomment-1014955521
> Will the DockerHub images be updated with this fix? I'm having issues with
`dockerhub.docker.artifactory.viasat.com/apache/airflow:1.10.15-python3.6` due
to the key
potiuk closed pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
mhbrown removed a comment on pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912#issuecomment-1014953406
Will the DockerHub images be updated with this fix? I'm having issues with
`dockerhub.docker.artifactory.viasat.com/apache/airflow:1.10.15-python3.6` due
to the key
mhbrown commented on pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912#issuecomment-1014953406
Will the DockerHub images be updated with this fix? I'm having issues with
`dockerhub.docker.artifactory.viasat.com/apache/airflow:1.10.15-python3.6` due
to the key change.
potiuk commented on pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912#issuecomment-1014946516
Note. I will also need to (doing it now) rebuild past released docker images
to allow people to extend those (apt-get update fails without the key).
--
This is an automated
potiuk commented on issue #20911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20911#issuecomment-1014940304
I am **just** refreshing all the images down to 2.1.0. We have a
"reproducible" Docker prod imge preparation system that allows us to do this.
--
This is an automated message
alex-astronomer edited a comment on issue #16764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16764#issuecomment-1014936179
Did some more research and it leads me to believe that if we consider the
TaskGroup to be a "dependable" in the same way that we consider tasks able to
depend
NadimYounes commented on issue #20911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20911#issuecomment-1014938011
@potiuk Will this fix be applied to all Airflow `2*` or will it only go into
the latest?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
alex-astronomer edited a comment on issue #16764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16764#issuecomment-1014936179
Did some more research and it leads me to believe that if we consider the
TaskGroup to be a "dependable" in the same way that we consider tasks able to
depend
alex-astronomer edited a comment on issue #16764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16764#issuecomment-1014936179
Did some more research and it leads me to believe that if we consider the
TaskGroup to be a "dependable" in the same way that we consider tasks able to
depend
alex-astronomer commented on issue #16764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16764#issuecomment-1014936179
Did some more research and it leads me to believe that if we consider the
TaskGroup to be a "dependable" in the same way that we consider tasks able to
depend on each
potiuk opened a new pull request #20912:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20912
MySQL changed key used to sign their apt packages. This caused
docker building failing for prod images as MySQL could not be
installed.
New Public Key is used instead.
Fixes:
potiuk commented on issue #20911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20911#issuecomment-1014934691
Yep. OUR CI builds started to fail this morning too. Switching to the new
mysql public key now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
edithturn edited a comment on issue #20254:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20254#issuecomment-1012299835
@potiuk I am analyzing this one. When you said: "**docker_tests.py**" do
you mean: "**ci_run_docker_tests.py**" .
If it is, this script is in:
edithturn commented on pull request #20763:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20763#issuecomment-1014932713
@potiuk I fixed. Now "This branch is 3 commits ahead of apache:main."
Thank you for your patience Jarek.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
potiuk commented on pull request #20889:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20889#issuecomment-1014931285
@ashb @uranusjr @ephraimbuddy @mik-laj - this one needs to be merged to fix
PROD build in #20910
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
potiuk commented on pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910#issuecomment-1014930849
BTW the prod image failure is actually due to this one
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20889 - once this is merged, prod image
should correctly use CI image with
cdabella commented on issue #19313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19313#issuecomment-1014930590
Bit of life got in the way and I have not implemented the fix. Please feel
free @nkyuray
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
nkyuray commented on issue #19313:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19313#issuecomment-1014929673
Hi @eladkal,
If @cdabella will not take this, I would like to give a try.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
NadimYounes opened a new issue #20911:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20911
### Apache Airflow version
2.0.2
### What happened
When attempting to rebuild an apache airflow image, we are getting failures
during our builds when trying to run `apt-get
eladkal commented on issue #19511:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19511#issuecomment-1014924181
@ShakaibKhan any findings you can share?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
eladkal commented on issue #19578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19578#issuecomment-1014923279
fixed in https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19735
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
eladkal closed issue #19578:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/19578
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910#issuecomment-1014923145
Right. Looks like the tests are all green when I replace vendored-in
connexion with the latest version from PyPI (the failure was caused by
temporary problem with GPG key
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910#discussion_r786312723
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -86,9 +85,8 @@ install_requires =
blinker
cached_property~=1.5;python_version<="3.7"
cattrs~=1.1, !=1.7.*
-
eladkal commented on issue #17686:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17686#issuecomment-1014920662
@alex-astronomer are you still working on this issue?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
potiuk closed pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910#discussion_r786308856
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -86,9 +85,8 @@ install_requires =
blinker
cached_property~=1.5;python_version<="3.7"
cattrs~=1.1, !=1.7.*
-
alex-astronomer commented on issue #16764:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16764#issuecomment-1014913471
I think in order to really tackle this one, there are two issues here that
need to be addressed.
1. Just like the ticket mentions, we do expect that the TaskGroup
potiuk commented on a change in pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910#discussion_r786253180
##
File path: setup.cfg
##
@@ -86,9 +86,8 @@ install_requires =
blinker
cached_property~=1.5;python_version<="3.7"
cattrs~=1.1, !=1.7.*
-
potiuk commented on pull request #20891:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20891#issuecomment-1014833871
Let's see - I created #20910 to see if the tests will pass. @uranusjr
@mik-laj @ephraimbuddy -> let's see if connexion tests will pass
out-of-the-box, if so maybe you can
potiuk opened a new pull request #20910:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20910
The `connexion` library has been vendored in because of requests
library that used to have non-optional chardet LGPL dependency,
however requests library had since released a version (which we
potiuk edited a comment on issue #20901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20901#issuecomment-1014819190
Ah. I see - this actually converts the value of the bytes to "nice string"
representation:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#boolean-operations-and-or-not
potiuk commented on issue #20901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20901#issuecomment-1014819190
Ah. I see - this actually converts the value of the bytes to nice "string"
representation:
https://docs.python.org/3/library/stdtypes.html#boolean-operations-and-or-not
>
ITJamie opened a new issue #20909:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20909
### Description
Being able to "bump up" the priority_weight of a queued task would be useful
from the gui.
### Use case/motivation
Sometimes a team may be waiting on a queued task.
potiuk commented on issue #20906:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/20906#issuecomment-1014808635
> This is running 100% on linux though... The container is running on a
linux machine and all volume mounts are on linux hosts...
That was my guess - ther are similar to
o-nikolas commented on a change in pull request #20858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20858#discussion_r786231758
##
File path: airflow/providers/amazon/aws/hooks/base_aws.py
##
@@ -199,8 +199,6 @@ def _read_credentials_from_connection(self) ->
kaxil removed a comment on pull request #20838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20838#issuecomment-1012518905
> We **just** had discussion that we need it yesterday with @mik-laj and
@mhenc :)
We have got more stuffed planned to make Airflow Upgrades more reliable -
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786222539
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1706,25 +1701,49 @@ def _validate_kwarg_names_for_mapping(cls:
Type[BaseOperator], func_name: str, v
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#issuecomment-1014769681
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786204849
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -1706,25 +1701,49 @@ def _validate_kwarg_names_for_mapping(cls:
Type[BaseOperator], func_name:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786202050
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ def _apply_defaults(cls, func: T) -> T:
non_optional_args = {
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786202050
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ def _apply_defaults(cls, func: T) -> T:
non_optional_args = {
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786200271
##
File path: airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
##
@@ -653,10 +677,14 @@ def deserialize_operator(cls, encoded_op: Dict[str, Any])
->
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786199495
##
File path: airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
##
@@ -658,7 +694,9 @@ def deserialize_operator(cls, encoded_op: Dict[str, Any])
->
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786197515
##
File path: airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
##
@@ -658,7 +694,8 @@ def deserialize_operator(cls, encoded_op: Dict[str, Any])
->
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786197515
##
File path: airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
##
@@ -658,7 +694,8 @@ def deserialize_operator(cls, encoded_op: Dict[str, Any])
->
ashb commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786183131
##
File path: airflow/models/baseoperator.py
##
@@ -207,6 +207,7 @@ def apply_defaults(self: "BaseOperator", *args: Any,
**kwargs: Any) -> Any:
alexandrebunn commented on issue #10605:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/10605#issuecomment-1014746127
We are facing the same issue, but in our case the error is related the
absent of an option to define resources to the sidecar container. Our
kubernetes cluster has this
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #20743:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20743#discussion_r786181173
##
File path: airflow/serialization/serialized_objects.py
##
@@ -653,10 +677,14 @@ def deserialize_operator(cls, encoded_op: Dict[str, Any])
->
demetthyl opened a new pull request #20609:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20609
…for-airflow-migrations
This allows the init containers to work with secretbackend externalized sql
alchemy urls for instance.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
