ulsc commented on a change in pull request #22179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22179#discussion_r825408162
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/suite/hooks/drive.py
##
@@ -180,12 +180,25 @@ def get_file_id(self, folder_id: str, file_name: str,
drive_id:
uranusjr commented on issue #22141:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22141#issuecomment-1066047007
Just dump everything to the log file when the scheduler launches, then?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
harishkrao commented on a change in pull request #22104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22104#discussion_r825407008
##
File path: tests/providers/google/suite/operators/test_sheets.py
##
@@ -39,12 +39,9 @@ def test_execute(self, mock_xcom, mock_hook):
op
harishkrao commented on a change in pull request #22104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22104#discussion_r825394693
##
File path: tests/providers/google/suite/operators/test_sheets.py
##
@@ -39,12 +39,9 @@ def test_execute(self, mock_xcom, mock_hook):
op
andyfcx commented on issue #22152:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22152#issuecomment-1066045310
I think `return "".join((str(n) for n in nodes) `
might not work due to possible returning as generator string representations
--
This is an automated message from the Apache
andyfcx commented on a change in pull request #22218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22218#discussion_r825405925
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -1278,7 +1278,10 @@ def get_template_env(self) -> jinja2.Environment:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22179#discussion_r825405904
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/suite/hooks/drive.py
##
@@ -180,12 +180,25 @@ def get_file_id(self, folder_id: str, file_name: str,
drive_id:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22218#discussion_r825405206
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -1278,7 +1278,10 @@ def get_template_env(self) -> jinja2.Environment:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22218#discussion_r825405109
##
File path: airflow/models/abstractoperator.py
##
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ def get_template_env(self) -> "jinja2.Environment":
dag =
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22218#discussion_r825404401
##
File path: airflow/models/abstractoperator.py
##
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ def get_template_env(self) -> "jinja2.Environment":
dag =
uranusjr edited a comment on pull request #22218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22218#issuecomment-1066043308
(Some context for this) I’m helping @andyfcx to work out a solution to
#22152.
The main problem with #22152 is that, when you set
uranusjr commented on pull request #22218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22218#issuecomment-1066043308
(Some context for this) I’m helping @andyfcx to work out a solution to
#22152.
The main problem with #22152 is that, when you set
`render_template_as_native_obj` on
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
eladkal pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 4e70aeb Fix typo in mongo.rst (#22211)
add 42a891d Update ``GKEDeleteClusterOperator`,
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #22212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22212#issuecomment-1066043182
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
eladkal merged pull request #22212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22212
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
andyfcx commented on a change in pull request #22218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22218#discussion_r825399819
##
File path: airflow/models/abstractoperator.py
##
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ def get_template_env(self) -> "jinja2.Environment":
dag =
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22218#discussion_r825399731
##
File path: airflow/models/abstractoperator.py
##
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ def get_template_env(self) -> "jinja2.Environment":
dag =
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22217#discussion_r825399461
##
File path: airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker_swarm.py
##
@@ -86,8 +86,16 @@ class DockerSwarmOperator(DockerOperator):
:param mode:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #22218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22218#issuecomment-1066042236
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
andyfcx opened a new pull request #22218:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22218
https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22152
I added a flag **force_string** to make sure returning will be string,
Testing code still in progress.
Need more discussion.
---
xingularity commented on issue #22072:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22072#issuecomment-1066041776
I am interested in this issue and I would like to work on it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
Bowrna opened a new pull request #22217:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22217
related: #15974
Added more docs information about adding network and constraints in Docker
swarm option.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
ulsc commented on a change in pull request #22179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22179#discussion_r825398098
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/suite/hooks/drive.py
##
@@ -180,12 +180,25 @@ def get_file_id(self, folder_id: str, file_name: str,
drive_id:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #20757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20757#issuecomment-1066039821
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might
eladkal commented on a change in pull request #20757:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20757#discussion_r825397763
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow-providers-sftp/connections/sftp.rst
##
@@ -73,17 +73,25 @@ Extra (optional)
* ``private_key`` Specify the
ashb commented on a change in pull request #22200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22200#discussion_r825396615
##
File path: .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/airflow_bug_report.yml
##
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ body:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
-
ashb commented on a change in pull request #22210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22210#discussion_r825396544
##
File path: airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/kubernetes_pod.py
##
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ def _get_ti_pod_labels(context: Optional[dict] = None,
uranusjr commented on issue #22078:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22078#issuecomment-1066038666
I believe those attributes are set on the `SerializedBaseOperator` instance
directly. It should be, otherwise the deserialization has a bug…
--
This is an automated message
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a change to branch scheduler-autorefresh-pause
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
discard 41a7a74 fix test
discard c4fc2a4 pause autorefresh if scheduler isn't running
add
uranusjr commented on pull request #22151:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22151#issuecomment-1066037550
I rebased the branch.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
harishkrao commented on a change in pull request #22104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22104#discussion_r825394693
##
File path: tests/providers/google/suite/operators/test_sheets.py
##
@@ -39,12 +39,9 @@ def test_execute(self, mock_xcom, mock_hook):
op
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #22163:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22163#issuecomment-1066035122
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #19702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19702#discussion_r825387595
##
File path: tests/www/test_utils.py
##
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ def setUp(self):
self.attr_renderer = utils.get_attr_renderer()
def
wutienyang commented on issue #22215:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22215#issuecomment-1066025600
Hi, thanks for the easy issue to experience how to contribute to Airflow. I
am from PyCon APAC 2022 Sprint
It's my first time to give pr
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #22216:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22216#issuecomment-1066025318
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might
wutienyang opened a new pull request #22216:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22216
Hi, I replace contributing guide image. Fork airflow/master -> Fork
airflow/main
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #22216:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22216#issuecomment-1066025133
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22213#discussion_r825386896
##
File path: tests/providers/google/cloud/hooks/test_dataproc.py
##
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@ def test_wait_for_job(self, mock_get_job):
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #22202:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22202#issuecomment-1066023351
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22179:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22179#discussion_r825385969
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/suite/hooks/drive.py
##
@@ -180,12 +180,25 @@ def get_file_id(self, folder_id: str, file_name: str,
drive_id:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22210#discussion_r825385828
##
File path: airflow/providers/cncf/kubernetes/operators/kubernetes_pod.py
##
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ def _get_ti_pod_labels(context: Optional[dict] =
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #22212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22212#issuecomment-1066022487
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22104#discussion_r825385622
##
File path: tests/providers/google/suite/operators/test_sheets.py
##
@@ -39,12 +39,9 @@ def test_execute(self, mock_xcom, mock_hook):
op =
uranusjr commented on issue #22154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22154#issuecomment-1066021985
Done in readthedocs/sphinx-autoapi#330
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
uranusjr commented on issue #22154:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22154#issuecomment-1066018811
Hmm, this is weird. The documentation is automatically generated from
AutoAPI, and I have no idea why it chooses to render the tuple as a list.
Perhaps we need to raise this
euccas commented on issue #22174:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22174#issuecomment-1066018099
I think we should keep the download buttons in the modal window, those
buttons are useful!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22200#discussion_r825381690
##
File path: .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/airflow_bug_report.yml
##
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ body:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
-
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #22206:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22206#issuecomment-1066015412
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
uranusjr opened a new issue #22215:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22215
### Describe the issue with documentation
In `CONTRIBUTING.rst`, the image still says to fork `airflow/master`:
uranusjr commented on pull request #22204:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22204#issuecomment-1066013806
Some ideas from how pip does this. pip fully automates the
vendoring-patching process so a new version can be pulled immediately if
needed. It uses
mik-laj commented on issue #22174:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22174#issuecomment-1066006844
SGTM. We should add it because it is actually more intuitive. I'm just
wondering if we shouldn't delete the download buttons from the modal window.
What do you think?
--
This
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22204:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22204#discussion_r825371901
##
File path: airflow/_vendor/README.md
##
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+# Vendor package
+
+## What vendored packages are for
+
+The `airlfow._vendor` package is
kazanzhy commented on pull request #22125:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22125#issuecomment-1065989260
A new `moto` version was released recently.
So I can say that operators work as expected with real AWS and `moto` as
well.
--
This is an automated message from the
github-actions[bot] commented on issue #9610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9610#issuecomment-1065989000
This issue has been closed because it has not received response from the
issue author.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
github-actions[bot] closed issue #9610:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9610
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kamilbregula pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 31550c8 Update instructions of doc updates when removing providers
from release (#22199)
add 4e70aeb
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #22211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22211#issuecomment-1065977310
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #22211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22211#issuecomment-1065977304
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might
mik-laj merged pull request #22211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22211
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
sebbASF commented on issue #22197:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/22197#issuecomment-1065966741
I extracted the links semi-manually from the main page, and then checked
them all using a Whimsy tool.
However of course this failed at the first hurdle.
--
This is
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825351993
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/task_instance_endpoint.py
##
@@ -88,7 +79,7 @@ def get_task_instance(
)
if task_instance
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825351792
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -412,20 +411,19 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
BasPH commented on a change in pull request #22200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22200#discussion_r825347613
##
File path: .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/airflow_doc_issue_report.yml
##
@@ -19,15 +19,15 @@ body:
# yamllint enable rule:line-length
- type:
BasPH commented on a change in pull request #22200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22200#discussion_r825347591
##
File path: .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/airflow_bug_report.yml
##
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ body:
required: true
- type: textarea
attributes:
-
BasPH commented on pull request #22200:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22200#issuecomment-1065958204
I personally don't perceive this as strong language, but maybe a native
English speaker can share their opinion here
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
hsrocks closed pull request #21863:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/21863
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
harishkrao commented on pull request #22213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22213#issuecomment-1065948965
@potiuk @mik-laj Opened another PR for the same issue, can you please take a
look when you have time? Thank you.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
harishkrao commented on pull request #22104:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22104#issuecomment-1065948819
> @potiuk @mik-laj @kaxil if you have time, can you please review the PR? If
you are busy and can suggest other reviewers, that is great too. Thank you!
@potiuk Just
ashb commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825338095
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -412,20 +411,19 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
ashb commented on a change in pull request #22214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22214#discussion_r825337610
##
File path: tests/dag_processing/test_processor.py
##
@@ -222,15 +222,47 @@ def
test_dag_file_processor_sla_miss_doesnot_raise_integrity_error(self,
ashb commented on a change in pull request #22214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22214#discussion_r825337571
##
File path: tests/dag_processing/test_processor.py
##
@@ -222,15 +222,47 @@ def
test_dag_file_processor_sla_miss_doesnot_raise_integrity_error(self,
ashb commented on a change in pull request #22214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22214#discussion_r825336536
##
File path: tests/dag_processing/test_processor.py
##
@@ -222,15 +222,47 @@ def
test_dag_file_processor_sla_miss_doesnot_raise_integrity_error(self,
alexott commented on pull request #22050:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22050#issuecomment-1065940476
I’ll look tomorrow into a new version
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
potiuk commented on pull request #22050:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22050#issuecomment-1065940163
BTW. @alexott @NiallEgan - I looked at 2.0.0b1 code, and it is very
different from 1.0.1 - so I think even if it will be fixed in 2.0.0b1, this
might mean some provider
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825335721
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -375,16 +375,15 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825335721
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -375,16 +375,15 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825335661
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/endpoints/task_instance_endpoint.py
##
@@ -88,7 +79,7 @@ def get_task_instance(
)
if task_instance
potiuk commented on pull request #22050:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22050#issuecomment-1065938743
BTW. @alexott - this might be one reason why I **COULD** speed up release of
the Databricks provider :P
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825333926
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -412,20 +411,19 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825333926
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -412,20 +411,19 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825333926
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -412,20 +411,19 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825333926
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -412,20 +411,19 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
alexott commented on pull request #22050:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22050#issuecomment-1065934809
@potiuk let me raise it with the dev team... Source code is in the pypi
itself right now
@NiallEgan - is it possible to fix?
--
This is an automated message
potiuk closed pull request #22208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22208
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
plockaby commented on pull request #20147:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/20147#issuecomment-1065933676
I've updated my branch with the latest commits.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
potiuk commented on pull request #22050:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22050#issuecomment-1065933341
Hey @alexott - we seem to have a blocker for Python 3.10 enabling in
databicks-sql-connector (one of the last few blockers):
```
self =
item = ['file1',
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825331979
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -412,20 +411,19 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
dstandish opened a new pull request #22214:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22214
Tests previously did not document that the SlaMiss records created are for
TIs that follow completed TIs. Importantly, the TIs for which SLA misses are
created may not actually exist in the DB,
harishkrao opened a new pull request #22213:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22213
related: #20453
The PR is related to the Big Query and PubSub providers' unit tests. Fixed
include:
* Changing the tests to assert instead of having only `has_calls`.
*
anuragbisht12 commented on pull request #22212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22212#issuecomment-1065930253
Hi Please merge this PR, the current docstring is misleading, I have updated
it.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
anuragbisht12 opened a new pull request #22212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22212
updated misleading docstrings to use Kubernetes rather than Compute as this
takes Kubernetes engine zone as location parameters
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #22212:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22212#issuecomment-1065929896
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
subkanthi commented on pull request #19729:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/19729#issuecomment-1065929107
I can work on this in a week from now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #22211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22211#issuecomment-1065928696
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
likecodingloveproblems opened a new pull request #22211:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22211
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
ashb commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825329765
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -412,20 +411,19 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
ashb commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825329685
##
File path: airflow/api_connexion/schemas/sla_miss_schema.py
##
@@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ class Meta:
task_id = auto_field(dump_only=True)
dag_id =
dstandish commented on a change in pull request #22184:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22184#discussion_r825329142
##
File path: airflow/dag_processing/processor.py
##
@@ -375,16 +375,15 @@ def manage_slas(self, dag: DAG, session: Session = None)
-> None:
potiuk closed pull request #22208:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22208
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #22210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/22210#issuecomment-1065918431
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
1 - 100 of 135 matches
Mail list logo
