phanikumv commented on code in PR #26345:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26345#discussion_r971030906
##
airflow/providers/microsoft/azure/hooks/data_factory.py:
##
@@ -479,12 +481,121 @@ def delete_dataset(
Delete the dataset.
:param
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #26411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26411#issuecomment-1247490041
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our Contribution
Lee-W opened a new pull request, #26411:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26411
* CONTRIBUTING.rst: replace markdown style link as rst style
* CONTRIBUTORS_QUICK_START.rst
* unify python version in examples to 3.8 (originally, the first example
uses 3.7 which could
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a change to branch v2-4-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
omit a8ce50986d Update Release Note
add 3871f00230 Fix UI redirect (#26409)
add c7ea01d676 Better
wookiist commented on issue #23145:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/23145#issuecomment-1247451952
Is there any update regarding this issue?
There are many tasks that fall into the 'scheduled' state when working on
the backfill
Apache Airflow 2.3.4 / Kubernetes
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 951b708461 Adding podAnnotations to StatsD
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on PR #25732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25732#issuecomment-1247434280
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
jedcunningham closed issue #25446: Helm Chart: Allow adding annotations to
statsd deployment
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/25446
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
jedcunningham merged PR #25732:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/25732
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 56e7555c42 Fix UI redirect (#26409)
add fdecf12051 Add min attrs version (#26408)
No new revisions were
jedcunningham merged PR #26408:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26408
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 56e7555c42 Fix UI redirect (#26409)
jedcunningham merged PR #26409:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26409
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham closed issue #26405: helm chart fails during `post-install`
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26405
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
eeluve commented on issue #26405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26405#issuecomment-1247426380
❤️ thanks man solved
also, a note: I'll quite likely kill my colleague, that I pinged 5 hours ago
about whether this cluster is fine
lets just think of this as some nice
jedcunningham commented on issue #26405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26405#issuecomment-1247419205
Sorry, I went from memory and got it wrong, it'd be
`postgresql.primary.nodeSelector`!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
eeluve commented on issue #26405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26405#issuecomment-1247418616
thanks, checking `postgres.primary.nodeSelector`. I'll update this
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub
jedcunningham commented on issue #26405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26405#issuecomment-1247418011
Something cluster related seems likely. When you describe any of the pending
pods, normally you'll see why in the events. In the OP I had a bit of trouble
determining if it
eeluve commented on issue #26405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26405#issuecomment-1247413155
it still doesn't work
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
jedcunningham commented on issue #26405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26405#issuecomment-1247407598
Does this work?
```
helm upgrade --install airflow apache-airflow/airflow
```
If so, slowly add stuff in until it doesn't. That might help us narrow down
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #26341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26341#discussion_r971373620
##
dev/breeze/src/airflow_breeze/commands/developer_commands.py:
##
@@ -213,6 +213,18 @@ def shell(
@option_mount_sources
@option_integration
ferruzzi opened a new pull request, #26410:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26410
Follows the template set forward in
https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/24643
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull Request
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #26371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26371#discussion_r971365529
##
RELEASE_NOTES.rst:
##
@@ -27,123 +27,354 @@ Airflow 2.4.0beta1 (2022-09-08)
Significant Changes
^^^
-- The DB related classes:
dstandish commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-124734
@dimberman got this deprecation warning which ... probably you can avoid
somehow:
```
local ❯ airflow dags test example_time_delta_sensor_async -S
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 01e3fb7eac Clear autoregistered DAGs if there are any import errors
(#26398)
add e458eb689d Fix params reference
potiuk merged PR #26406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26406
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from f6c579c1c0 Require dag_id arg for dags list-runs (#26357)
add 01e3fb7eac Clear autoregistered DAGs if
jedcunningham merged PR #26398:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26398
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
potiuk commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247337394
> @potiuk could we make the debugger a separate discussion? I don't
personally have a strong opinion one way or another, but it sounds like that
might be something that could slow down
jedcunningham opened a new pull request, #26408:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26408
I'm not sure when we started using attrs directly, but we do and we need
>=22.1.0 as we use the min_length validator.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
potiuk commented on PR #26393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26393#issuecomment-1247330258
(alledged fix that is - I tested it locally and it worked to create the k8s
venv ;) - but you never know in CI).
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
potiuk commented on PR #26393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26393#issuecomment-1247329595
Fix in #26407
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
potiuk commented on PR #26407:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26407#issuecomment-1247329222
This one is needed in order to make changes like #26393 to pass the k8s
tests. This change adds FAB version bump - so that they are conflicting with
the current constraints. And this
potiuk opened a new pull request, #26407:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26407
There is an issue with trying to install the k8s env where the current
requirements conflict with constraints. The k8s env creation is failing in this
case.
This PR will not fail hard when
gmsantos commented on PR #26406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26406#issuecomment-1247326244
```
Moved
Permanently.
```
curl is getting this message because it's trying to download the following
file pattern:
potiuk commented on PR #26406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26406#issuecomment-1247325586
nice one!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To
gmsantos opened a new pull request, #26406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26406
Fixes breeze commands that depends on the default constraints branch,
such as the generated diff for
`breeze release-management generate-constraints`
--
This is an automated message
potiuk commented on PR #26393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26393#issuecomment-1247315599
> Unfortunately, this PR didn't pass the [CI step
check](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L1635)
for a canary run:
Told ya :). We are both
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch v2-4-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
omit 6bda3ae243 Update Release Note
add a8ce50986d Update Release Note
This update added new revisions
blag commented on PR #26376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26376#issuecomment-1247301953
Ease of testing is a perfectly valid and good reason. You've convinced me.
And yeah, I was thinking the dataset event would be the last of all of the
dependencies that was updated
eeluve opened a new issue, #26405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26405
### Official Helm Chart version
1.6.0 (latest released)
### Apache Airflow version
2.3.0
### Kubernetes Version
v1.20.6
### Helm Chart configuration
- helm
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #26405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26405#issuecomment-1247290943
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
dimberman commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971284109
##
airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:
##
@@ -497,6 +524,56 @@ def dag_test(args, session=None):
print(dot_graph.source)
+def _run_task(ti:
gmsantos commented on PR #26393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26393#issuecomment-1247288007
Unfortunately, this PR didn't pass the [CI step
check](https://github.com/apache/airflow/blob/main/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L1635)
for a canary run:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch v2-4-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
omit ec9552d53d Update Release Note
add 6bda3ae243 Update Release Note
This update added new revisions
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch v2-4-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
omit 98af5a6c54 Apply suggestions from code review
omit 4a4dc40068 Update Release Note
add
dimberman commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247279974
@potiuk could we make the debugger a separate discussion? I don't personally
have a strong opinion one way or another, but it sounds like that might be
something that could slow down
vincbeck commented on code in PR #26221:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26221#discussion_r971273303
##
tests/system/providers/amazon/aws/example_batch.py:
##
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
# specific language governing permissions and limitations
# under the License.
from
dstandish commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971272469
##
airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:
##
@@ -497,6 +524,56 @@ def dag_test(args, session=None):
print(dot_graph.source)
+def _run_task(ti:
dstandish commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971272230
##
airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:
##
@@ -497,6 +524,56 @@ def dag_test(args, session=None):
print(dot_graph.source)
+def _run_task(ti:
ashb commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971269263
##
airflow/models/dag.py:
##
@@ -2435,6 +2436,51 @@ def cli(self):
args = parser.parse_args()
args.func(args, self)
+def test(self,
ephraimbuddy commented on code in PR #26371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26371#discussion_r971254574
##
RELEASE_NOTES.rst:
##
@@ -27,123 +27,354 @@ Airflow 2.4.0beta1 (2022-09-08)
Significant Changes
^^^
-- The DB related classes:
ephraimbuddy commented on code in PR #26371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26371#discussion_r971249686
##
RELEASE_NOTES.rst:
##
@@ -27,123 +27,354 @@ Airflow 2.4.0beta1 (2022-09-08)
Significant Changes
^^^
-- The DB related classes:
dimberman commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971244568
##
airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:
##
@@ -497,6 +524,56 @@ def dag_test(args, session=None):
print(dot_graph.source)
+def _run_task(ti:
dstandish commented on PR #26376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26376#issuecomment-1247241432
> My personal preference would be to pass around the DatasetModel and
DatasetEvent objects directly
ultimately, they are still private, so, if someone wants to change it back,
potiuk commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247240375
> Oh yes. Still, see my previous point about breakpoint() then
breakpoint is fine. but it will not give you a fully-fledged, intuitive
debugger in the console wiht visual
dimberman commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971238703
##
airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:
##
@@ -497,6 +523,60 @@ def dag_test(args, session=None):
print(dot_graph.source)
+@provide_session
+def
ashb commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971237931
##
airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:
##
@@ -497,6 +524,56 @@ def dag_test(args, session=None):
print(dot_graph.source)
+def _run_task(ti:
ashb commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971237478
##
airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:
##
@@ -497,6 +524,56 @@ def dag_test(args, session=None):
print(dot_graph.source)
+def _run_task(ti:
ashb commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247232727
> We already have DebugExecutor that does exactly that in the same way and a
bit simpler (and is portable across IDEs) I think..
potiuk commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247225730
> Sneak peak
>
> 2022-09-14.20-34-13.webm
We already have DebugExecutor that does exactly that in the same way and a
bit simpler I think..
ashb commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971228491
##
airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:
##
@@ -497,6 +523,60 @@ def dag_test(args, session=None):
print(dot_graph.source)
+@provide_session
+def
potiuk commented on PR #26341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26341#issuecomment-1247222862
Looking forward to merging this one :). Should be good improvement for many
users.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
potiuk commented on PR #26341:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26341#issuecomment-1247223116
(rebased it to include PEP-563)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
ashb commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247220745
Sneak peak
[2022-09-14
20-34-13.webm](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/34150/190246852-aabf03aa-3588-4fca-b652-e8c0a40d0b61.webm)
--
This is an automated message
dimberman commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971225589
##
airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:
##
@@ -497,6 +523,60 @@ def dag_test(args, session=None):
print(dot_graph.source)
+@provide_session
+def
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch v2-4-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from 4a4dc40068 Update Release Note
add 98af5a6c54 Apply suggestions from code review
No new revisions
ashb commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247206686
It needs a bit of work/polish, but using this
```json
{
// Use IntelliSense to learn about possible attributes.
// Hover to view descriptions of existing attributes.
potiuk commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247195492
Or name it `--debug-pudb` as a flag.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247195130
We can even do not make it a requiremeent, but install it dynamically when
someone uses `--debug` option BTW.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond
potiuk commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247192162
> Thank you @potiuk !
>
> Do you think that would be too oppinionated to choose a specific debugger?
One really awesome thing we could potentially do with this is even write a
DMilmont opened a new pull request, #26401:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26401
This removes the wording that baking DAGs into a docker image is the
recommended way. Additionally it calls out the downside of doing so.
closes:
ashb commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247187636
I don't think we should integrate any specific debugger here in this CLI
function, but instruct people to use `breakpoint()` and then either it "just
works" with their IDE's integrated
ashb commented on code in PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#discussion_r971187508
##
airflow/cli/commands/dag_command.py:
##
@@ -497,6 +523,60 @@ def dag_test(args, session=None):
print(dot_graph.source)
+@provide_session
+def
dimberman commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247181981
Thank you @potiuk !
Do you think that would be too oppinionated to choose a specific debugger?
One really awesome thing we could potentially do with this is even write a
guide
blag commented on PR #26376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26376#issuecomment-1247151568
My personal preference would be to pass around the `DatasetModel` and
`DatasetEvent` objects directly, since that just seems cleaner to me. If/when
we publicize more/all of the dataset
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a commit to branch constraints-main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/constraints-main by this push:
new de1a5e15c4 Updating
potiuk commented on issue #13853:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13853#issuecomment-1247133724
Thanks for confirming it !
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
potiuk commented on PR #26393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26393#issuecomment-1247132314
> Nice workflow @potiuk ! 爛
When we see it works, yes. I am always sceptical about those kind of changes
in CI, because the only way to test them is to try them live :). So I
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #26371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26371#discussion_r971145746
##
RELEASE_NOTES.rst:
##
@@ -27,123 +27,354 @@ Airflow 2.4.0beta1 (2022-09-08)
Significant Changes
^^^
-- The DB related classes:
jedcunningham commented on code in PR #26371:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26371#discussion_r971140772
##
RELEASE_NOTES.rst:
##
@@ -27,123 +27,354 @@ Airflow 2.4.0beta1 (2022-09-08)
Significant Changes
^^^
-- The DB related classes:
potiuk commented on PR #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400#issuecomment-1247118543
This looks sper cool :). I will do some quick testing to see the
experience.
Few suggestions (asking more what you think about it and maybe those could
be separate PRs., or
oz-r commented on issue #13853:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/13853#issuecomment-1247111854
Finally got around to updating Airflow and it seems to be working as
expected now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch v2-4-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
discard 71cca39c2d Update release note
discard fb89ce9dcf Work around pyupgrade edge cases (#26384)
discard
gmsantos commented on PR #26393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26393#issuecomment-1247109591
Nice workflow @potiuk ! 爛
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific
blag commented on PR #26376:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26376#issuecomment-1247107735
Just to color in my thoughts on the private methods in the dataset manager -
I made them private only because I was trying to keep the dataset manager
public interface as small as
potiuk commented on issue #26397:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26397#issuecomment-1247105188
I think we had some issues fixed around that recently. Can you please
upgrade to 2.3.4 and check it there (you will have to do it anyway and you can
save us investigation and
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ephraimanierobi pushed a change to branch v2-4-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from fb89ce9dcf Work around pyupgrade edge cases (#26384)
add 71cca39c2d Update release note
No new
potiuk commented on code in PR #26384:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26384#discussion_r971116737
##
airflow/models/baseoperator.py:
##
@@ -1738,11 +1738,19 @@ def cross_downstream(
task.set_downstream(to_tasks)
+# pyupgrade assumes all type
dstandish commented on code in PR #26249:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26249#discussion_r971073832
##
airflow/models/taskinstance.py:
##
@@ -509,14 +509,8 @@ class TaskInstance(Base, LoggingMixin):
viewonly=True,
)
-trigger = relationship(
-
potiuk commented on PR #26393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26393#issuecomment-1247096211
This is actually Cool. We will test if the fix with bumping "fixed"
requirements that I implemented - works. Once we merge it, new PRs should take
a bit longer to build image (but they
potiuk commented on PR #26393:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26393#issuecomment-1247094363
Rebased to account for git-rev main failure :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
dimberman opened a new pull request, #26400:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26400
The current `airflow dag test` command is insufficient for an iterative
local workflow when developing dags. The current system relies on running a
backfill job which a) is extremely slow
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #26399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26399#issuecomment-1247071917
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
SPTKL opened a new issue, #26399:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/26399
### Apache Airflow version
main (development)
### What happened
In the GKEHook, the `create_cluster` method is creating a GKE cluster in the
project_id specified by the input, but in
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
jedcunningham pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new f6c579c1c0 Require dag_id arg for dags
jedcunningham merged PR #26357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26357
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
jedcunningham commented on PR #26357:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26357#issuecomment-1247057720
Merging as static check failures is already fixed in main.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and
dstandish commented on code in PR #26249:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/26249#discussion_r971073832
##
airflow/models/taskinstance.py:
##
@@ -509,14 +509,8 @@ class TaskInstance(Base, LoggingMixin):
viewonly=True,
)
-trigger = relationship(
-
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a change to branch v2-4-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
from b2b1416e6b Add more to the ignore list for non-core changes (#26355)
add fb89ce9dcf Work around pyupgrade
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo
