This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
github-bot pushed a change to tag nightly-master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
*** WARNING: tag nightly-master was modified! ***
from 94a7673 (commit)
to f107338 (commit)
from
tanjinP commented on issue #8970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8970#issuecomment-632979988
I can take this on as it relates to #8883
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #8974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8974#discussion_r429505660
##
File path: airflow/providers/hashicorp/secrets/vault.py
##
@@ -72,98 +68,90 @@ class VaultBackend(BaseSecretsBackend, LoggingMixin):
:type
VijayantSoni commented on pull request #8701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8701#issuecomment-632564576
@ashb made the changes. Test are failing due to moto missing support for
mocking ElastiCache. Do I need to write custom mock for this ? Let me know how
should we test
ashb commented on a change in pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#discussion_r429139507
##
File path: airflow/operators/python.py
##
@@ -145,6 +148,142 @@ def execute_callable(self):
return self.python_callable(*self.op_args,
stale[bot] closed pull request #7452:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7452
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-7086?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113785#comment-17113785
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-7086:
-
stale[bot] closed pull request #7761:
URL:
stale[bot] closed pull request #7761:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7761
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113786#comment-17113786
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-6831:
-
stale[bot] closed pull request #7452:
URL:
fuyi opened a new issue #8965:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8965
**Description**
According to the [Kubernetes Executor
doc](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/stable/kubernetes.html),
pod_mutation_hook is used to mutate pod object before sending to the
j-y-matsubara edited a comment on pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#issuecomment-632606590
@yuqian90
Thank you for your advise.
I have corrected the document that you pointed out.
And..
The continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr failure
j-y-matsubara edited a comment on pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#issuecomment-632606590
@yuqian90
Thank you for your advise.
I have corrected the document that you pointed out.
And..
The continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr failure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-5262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113912#comment-17113912
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-5262:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4512?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113932#comment-17113932
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-4512:
-
psuanm5030 commented on pull request #5288:
URL:
ashb commented on pull request #8701:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8701#issuecomment-632633027
@VijayantSoni Probably just using `unittest.mock` is enough here, yes please
-- we've done that in a few other places I think
j-y-matsubara edited a comment on pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#issuecomment-632606590
@yuqian90
Thank you for your advise.
I have corrected the document that you pointed out.
And...
The continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr failure
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 3f3a4b5e2a0fb256c023d6087026608697f40a2f
Author: Ash Berlin-Taylor
AuthorDate: Tue May 19 13:21:44 2020 +0100
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a change to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
discard 24b7416 Fix race in Celery tests by pre-creating result tables (#8909)
discard d13c681 [AIRFLOW-3367] Run
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 229f631f2dafa7a698e634a614c8fa4102f68b38
Author: Joshua Carp
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 3 04:19:25 2018 -0500
dimitrijepetrovic opened a new issue #8967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8967
the error happens because of "drop table " like in all other places
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
kaxil commented on pull request #7335:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7335#issuecomment-632628871
> I've put this in for 1.10.12, but we should do that in a backwards
compatible way (i.e. use the plugin method, but warn)
I think the stat_name_handler thing never made it
ashb commented on pull request #8901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8901#issuecomment-632632193
Hi @JavierLopezT The screenshot you posted looks like a nice feature -- is
there a reason you closed this PR?
j-y-matsubara edited a comment on pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#issuecomment-632606590
@yuqian90
Thank you for your advise.
I have corrected the document that you pointed out.
And..
The continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr failure
j-y-matsubara edited a comment on pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#issuecomment-632606590
@yuqian90
Thank you for your advise.
I have corrected the document that you pointed out.
And..
The continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr failure
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Ash Berlin-Taylor updated AIRFLOW-3367:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.0.0)
1.10.11
> Test celery with
U-Ozdemir opened a new pull request #8968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8968
This my first time working with an open source project and I posting here
the first attempt for an ML operator guide. It is still in progress now, but
some feedback is always welcome.
#
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #8968:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8968#issuecomment-632661432
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
U-Ozdemir commented on issue #8207:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8207#issuecomment-632669193
Hello, I have submitted a part of the guide. It can be used by others here
working on it aswell. Any feedback is always welcome.
Best regards,
Ozdemir
mik-laj opened a new issue #8970:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8970
Hello,
A better guide that describes how to use KubernetesPodOperator would be
useful. This is one of the most frequently used Airflow operators, so many
users have problems with this operator.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-4816?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113894#comment-17113894
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-4816:
-
JavierLopezT closed pull request #6670:
URL:
JavierLopezT closed pull request #8901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8901
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
turbaszek pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 94a7673 Pin google-cloud-datacatalog to <0.8 (#8957)
add 9a4a2d1 [AIRFLOW-5262] Update timeout exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-5262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113911#comment-17113911
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-5262:
-
turbaszek merged pull request #8466:
URL:
ashb commented on a change in pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#discussion_r429140874
##
File path: airflow/operators/python.py
##
@@ -145,6 +148,142 @@ def execute_callable(self):
return self.python_callable(*self.op_args,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113938#comment-17113938
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-6711:
-
kaxil commented on pull request #7335:
URL:
JavierLopezT commented on pull request #8901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8901#issuecomment-632633845
Hi @ashb, thank you. The only reason is that there is a huge mess with git
and I was thinking about a fresh start. It is explained a little deeper here
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a change to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 179fbb6 Cache 1 10 ci images (#8955) (#8959)
new d13c681 [AIRFLOW-3367] Run celery integration test with
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit 24b74168afe26500abaf82fd388eccee18611c4e
Author: Ash Berlin-Taylor
AuthorDate: Tue May 19 13:21:44 2020 +0100
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
commit d13c6810674dae4abbc572116852e6b331c9f40e
Author: Joshua Carp
AuthorDate: Mon Dec 3 04:19:25 2018 -0500
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113950#comment-17113950
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-3367:
--
Commit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3367?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113951#comment-17113951
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-3367:
--
Commit
nodyke opened a new issue #8969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8969
**Description**
As part of data lineage implementation, there is requirement to sending
lineage data from airflow to Apache Atlas. Current module, what represented in
1.10 stable version,
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #8969:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8969#issuecomment-632671185
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automated
j-y-matsubara commented on pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#issuecomment-632606590
@yuqian90
Thank you your advise.
I have corrected the document that you pointed out.
And..
The continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr failure doesn't seem to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-5262?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113913#comment-17113913
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on AIRFLOW-5262:
--
Commit
ashb commented on pull request #8901:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8901#issuecomment-632634642
Ahha, cool. yes. `git rebase` can be tricky the first thousand times you run
it - I've been there!
Don't worry to much about closed PRs, do what is easiest for you to not
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429236013
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/datafusion.py
##
@@ -357,12 +418,45 @@ def list_pipelines(
)
return
j-y-matsubara commented on a change in pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#discussion_r429157021
##
File path: UPDATING.md
##
@@ -62,6 +62,17 @@ https://developers.google.com/style/inclusive-documentation
-->
+### BaseSensorOperator to
ashb commented on pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#issuecomment-632623113
Do copy what I put in slack, Thanks to Stackoverflow I've got a way of
having `from airflow import task` be callable, and still work as a submodule:
```diff
diff --git
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113935#comment-17113935
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-6711:
-
ashb commented on pull request #7335:
URL:
ashb commented on pull request #7335:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7335#issuecomment-632627339
I've put this in for 1.10.12, but we should do that in a backwards
compatible way (i.e. use the plugin method, but warn)
ashb commented on issue #8967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8967#issuecomment-632642806
migrations are recorded when they are performed, and are only run once.
It should be impossible for the table to be dropped without also recording
that the migration was deleted.
ashb commented on pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#issuecomment-632646688
> The main question is: do we want to support that? Is this "hack" worth it,
and do IDEs get massively confused by this?
I think if IDEs support it, and we add tests for it
JavierLopezT closed pull request #6670:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/6670
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#discussion_r429151128
##
File path: airflow/operators/python.py
##
@@ -145,6 +147,141 @@ def execute_callable(self):
return self.python_callable(*self.op_args,
j-y-matsubara edited a comment on pull request #8867:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8867#issuecomment-632606590
@yuqian90
Thank you your advise.
I have corrected the document that you pointed out.
And..
The continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr failure doesn't
turbaszek merged pull request #8466:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8466
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #8966:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8966#issuecomment-632615701
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automated
dimitrijepetrovic opened a new issue #8966:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8966
When trying to view task_isntance list or dag_run (by clicking on circles on
the front page)
dag_id field is passed as undefined
dags.html (line 430) - value of "d" is undefined
`
psuanm5030 commented on pull request #5288:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/5288#issuecomment-632626255
Curious if there was any progress or other methods of getting this result?
This is an automated message from
ashb commented on pull request #7335:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7335#issuecomment-632631751
Ohhh, yeah, you may be right.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6711?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17113943#comment-17113943
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-6711:
-
ashb commented on pull request #7335:
URL:
ashb closed issue #8967:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8967
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
ashb edited a comment on pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#issuecomment-632646688
> The main question is: do we want to support that? Is this "hack" worth it,
and do IDEs get massively confused by this?
I think if IDEs support it, and we add tests
klsnreddy opened a new pull request #8983:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8983
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation
dimberman merged pull request #8702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8702
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-6569?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17114118#comment-17114118
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-6569:
-
maxcountryman commented on pull request #7232:
URL:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
ash pushed a commit to branch v1-10-test
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/v1-10-test by this push:
new 17150ae Pin Version of Azure Cosmos to
tylux commented on pull request #4660:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/4660#issuecomment-632749722
Can this get revisited? This goes against Kubernetes best practices to rely
on a different mechanism i.e dag code to set the resource limits instead of
standard pod limits.
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429236013
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/datafusion.py
##
@@ -357,12 +418,45 @@ def list_pipelines(
)
return
maxcountryman commented on pull request #7232:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/7232#issuecomment-632730483
It seems like the tests that are failing are unrelated to this patch and
seem to be the same tests that are also failing on master.
What's blocking merging this in
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429307560
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/operators/datafusion.py
##
@@ -674,14 +676,23 @@ def execute(self, context: Dict):
MichaelJDrK opened a new issue #8972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8972
**Apache Airflow version**:
1.10.10
**What happened**:
Use airflow out of the box, create any DAG, run the DAG.
Log will contain nested log messages like this (one line):
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #8972:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8972#issuecomment-632754220
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automated
dimberman closed pull request #8958:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8958
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
ashb opened a new pull request #8973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8973
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation
potiuk opened a new pull request #8974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8974
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests coverage for changes (not needed for documentation
yerrysherry opened a new issue #8971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8971
$ airflow version
1.10.10
Database:
CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core),
Webserver - scheduler:
lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #8971:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8971#issuecomment-632701306
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
This is an automated
turbaszek commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429292921
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/datafusion.py
##
@@ -386,15 +480,29 @@ def start_pipeline(
pipeline_name,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AIRFLOW-3819?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=17114144#comment-17114144
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on AIRFLOW-3819:
-
tylux commented on pull request #4660:
URL:
ashb commented on pull request #8973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8973#issuecomment-632759670
(I'm not sure at all if this is the right fix or not, but thought I'd try it)
This is an automated message from
potiuk commented on pull request #8974:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8974#issuecomment-632766569
Hey @ashb @kaxil -> here is the first of the Hooks. This one is implemented
for Vault. I extracted the client out of the Backend and added all the missing
authentication
dimberman commented on pull request #8702:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8702#issuecomment-632705967
Hi @Acehaidrey apologies for the delay. I've merged the PR and will work to
backport it on 1.10.11 :)
This
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
dimberman pushed a change to branch master
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 9a4a2d1 [AIRFLOW-5262] Update timeout exception to include dag (#8466)
add b055151 Add context to
jhtimmins commented on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632960556
@Acehaidrey Not sure about increasing the memory, but several of us are
actively working to reduce the image size to solve that issue. Hard to give an
exact timeline, but can
kaxil opened a new pull request #8981:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8981
Remove duplicate line from CONTRIBUTING.rst
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests
Acehaidrey commented on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632969149
hey @jhtimmins thanks for the update! That is okay with me. I just don't
know how to make this test pass otherwise and @dimberman has asked for it
Acehaidrey edited a comment on pull request #8680:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8680#issuecomment-632969149
hey @jhtimmins thanks for the update! That is okay with me. I just don't
know how to make this test pass otherwise and @dimberman has asked for it. do
you think we
kaxil opened a new pull request #8982:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8982
Remove defunct code from setup.py
---
Make sure to mark the boxes below before creating PR: [x]
- [x] Description above provides context of the change
- [x] Unit tests coverage for
samuelkhtu commented on issue #8525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/8525#issuecomment-632786479
Quick update. The PR is under review.
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
ashb commented on pull request #8973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8973#issuecomment-632802828
yeah, I thought this might be deliberate, bit wondered if it was a
pre-commit 1 vs 2 problem.
This is an
casassg commented on a change in pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#discussion_r429363622
##
File path: docs/concepts.rst
##
@@ -116,6 +116,47 @@ DAGs can be used as context managers to automatically
assign new operators to th
op.dag
jaketf commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429358908
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/datafusion.py
##
@@ -435,20 +435,52 @@ def _get_pipeline(
"workflows",
jaketf commented on a change in pull request #8954:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8954#discussion_r429345281
##
File path: airflow/providers/google/cloud/hooks/datafusion.py
##
@@ -386,15 +480,29 @@ def start_pipeline(
pipeline_name,
casassg commented on pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#issuecomment-632819478
I prefer to avoid doing that. Seems to add quite a bit of code complexity
and I doubt it will impact significantly the user experience. I think it should
be fine from users to
ashb commented on pull request #8973:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8973#issuecomment-632774494
https://github.com/apache/airflow/runs/699984569?check_suite_focus=true is
the problem I was dealing with
This is
casassg commented on a change in pull request #8962:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8962#discussion_r429339659
##
File path: airflow/operators/python.py
##
@@ -145,6 +148,142 @@ def execute_callable(self):
return self.python_callable(*self.op_args,
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #8846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8846#issuecomment-632825269
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
This is an automated message from the
mik-laj merged pull request #8846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/8846
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
