github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17524:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17524#issuecomment-895762858
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
lwyszomi commented on pull request #17137:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17137#issuecomment-895770385
@potiuk Thank you for your response. I know that feeling when in big project
we have some parts which randomly failing. I will try to what I can to help
community to improve
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #15330:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15330#discussion_r685734272
##
File path: airflow/decorators/__init__.py
##
@@ -41,103 +45,12 @@ def __call__(
"""
return
potiuk commented on pull request #17137:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17137#issuecomment-895776838
@lwyszomi - actually your comment yesterday made me take a closer look to
some of the failing cases (I am no vacations officialy but well, it's fun :) )
and I might have found
Sonins commented on a change in pull request #17428:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17428#discussion_r685708706
##
File path: chart/tests/test_elasticsearch_secret.py
##
@@ -96,3 +96,24 @@ def
test_should_correctly_handle_password_with_special_characters(self):
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #16012:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16012#issuecomment-895766066
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
huozhanfeng commented on issue #17437:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17437#issuecomment-895755619
> I've put this against the 2.2 milestone -- no promise if we (the core
team) will get in in for 2.2, but PRs greatly accepted and we're happy to help
you get your POC PR
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17526#discussion_r685723456
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -766,7 +766,17 @@ def _clean_tis_without_dagrun(self, session):
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17526:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17526#discussion_r685723456
##
File path: airflow/jobs/scheduler_job.py
##
@@ -766,7 +766,17 @@ def _clean_tis_without_dagrun(self, session):
potiuk merged pull request #17525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17525
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new bd0a3d5 Remove hard-coded container name for
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
potiuk pushed a commit to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/main by this push:
new 19777f1 Decreases cassandra memory requirement
stijndehaes commented on issue #16625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16625#issuecomment-895776139
We noticed a similar issue with Airflow 2.1.2. Job went from queued to
failed without retry, looking at the code I am not sure how to fix it. It is
clear that in
potiuk merged pull request #17524:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17524
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
eladkal commented on a change in pull request #17519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17519#discussion_r685730346
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/faq.rst
##
@@ -119,6 +119,18 @@ How do I trigger tasks based on another task's failure?
You can achieve this with
stijndehaes edited a comment on issue #16625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16625#issuecomment-895776139
We noticed this issue with Airflow 2.1.2. Job went from queued to failed
without retry, looking at the code I am not sure how to fix it. It is clear
that in
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17525:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17525#issuecomment-895762468
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
JavierLopezT commented on pull request #17515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17515#issuecomment-895784949
I would call it just `RedshiftHook`
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL
stijndehaes edited a comment on issue #16625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16625#issuecomment-895776139
We noticed this issue with Airflow 2.1.2. Job went from queued to failed
without retry, looking at the code I am not sure how to fix it. It is clear
that in
uranusjr merged pull request #17405:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17405
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 19777f1 Decreases cassandra memory requirement during Integration
tests (#17524)
add 82229b3 Add XCom.clear
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #16475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16475#discussion_r685764959
##
File path: airflow/jobs/backfill_job.py
##
@@ -471,6 +476,14 @@ def _per_task_process(key, ti, session=None):
enima2684 commented on a change in pull request #17474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17474#discussion_r685786839
##
File path: airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker_swarm.py
##
@@ -121,12 +153,16 @@ def _run_service(self) -> None:
gmsantos commented on issue #16833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16833#issuecomment-895818962
Does make sense to support helm templates in `podTemplate`? As of today,
there is no easy way to customize
the`files/pod-template-file.kubernetes-helm-yaml` content.
--
This
kaxil commented on issue #17437:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17437#issuecomment-895830829
@huozhanfeng the idea is that since you have a higher (maybe even 30 mins)
min_file_process_interval the file path queue would be empty after the first
pass, and then it will only
uranusjr commented on pull request #17501:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17501#issuecomment-895845363
Runs are being starved
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
huozhanfeng commented on issue #17437:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17437#issuecomment-895863014
> @huozhanfeng the idea is that since you have a higher (maybe even 30 mins)
min_file_process_interval the file path queue would be empty after the first
pass, and then it
huozhanfeng removed a comment on issue #17437:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17437#issuecomment-895755619
> I've put this against the 2.2 milestone -- no promise if we (the core
team) will get in in for 2.2, but PRs greatly accepted and we're happy to help
you get your POC
LionelZhao28 commented on pull request #17502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17502#issuecomment-895880253
I think `pendulum` works fine when dealing with the DST time.
I've changed the codes and add the unit test for the local run_id
--
This is an automated message from
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17519#issuecomment-895891375
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
JavierLopezT edited a comment on pull request #17515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17515#issuecomment-895784949
What do you think about calling it just `RedshiftHook`?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to
aa1371 commented on pull request #16829:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16829#issuecomment-895785831
@potiuk - fixed static check errors
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to
LionelZhao28 edited a comment on pull request #17502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17502#issuecomment-895793877
> I think the timezone part will change. For example, if you’re in England,
2am without DST (Greenwich Mean Time) would be 02:00:00+00:00, and 2am with DST
LionelZhao28 commented on pull request #17502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17502#issuecomment-895793877
> `:00:00+01:00`.
If that, I think it will work fine if we can make sure the DST offset is in
the `run_id`.
Or, we can add another filed to show whether the
lwyszomi commented on pull request #17137:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17137#issuecomment-895802566
@potiuk I rebased PR, I hope this help :) sorry that I ping you when you are
on the vacation.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17528#discussion_r685779664
##
File path: airflow/providers/ssh/operators/ssh.py
##
@@ -149,7 +149,13 @@ def execute(self, context) -> Union[bytes, str, bool]:
stijndehaes edited a comment on issue #16625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16625#issuecomment-895776139
We noticed this issue with Airflow 2.1.2. Job went from queued to failed
without retry, looking at the code I am not sure how to fix it. It is clear
that in
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17474#discussion_r685170203
##
File path: airflow/providers/docker/operators/docker_swarm.py
##
@@ -121,12 +153,16 @@ def _run_service(self) -> None:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17474#issuecomment-895850274
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
potiuk commented on issue #11309:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/11309#issuecomment-895850195
@john-james-sf - this issue is closed and I think your have a different
environment/error. Please open a new discussion (best) rather than issue and
describe your circumstances,
stijndehaes commented on issue #17370:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17370#issuecomment-895877622
> > May be related with: #16625
>
> If so, then it's resolved in #16301 which will be released in 2.1.3
@ephraimbuddy I don't think that #16301 solves #16625, the
enima2684 commented on issue #9310:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/9310#issuecomment-895893308
The issue https://github.com/docker/docker-py/issues/931 is still not yet
fixed and the DockerSwarmOperator still have the 60s delay before finishing a
completed service.
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17137:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17137#discussion_r685778883
##
File path: tests/providers/google/cloud/hooks/test_datafusion.py
##
@@ -197,13 +196,6 @@ def test_start_pipeline(self,
potiuk opened a new pull request #17528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17528
Sometimes, when the connection gets closed after shutdown, a race
condition causes "bad socket" error to be thrown. Actually there
is nothing wrong that can happen when closing a closed
uranusjr commented on issue #17527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17527#issuecomment-895815549
This was probably missed when we migrated from requests to httpx. Would you
be able to submit a pull request for this?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17414#discussion_r685803516
##
File path: airflow/www/views.py
##
@@ -2601,7 +2601,7 @@ def landing_times(self, session=None):
x_points[task_id] = []
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17414#issuecomment-895834636
The PR most likely needs to run full matrix of tests because it modifies
parts of the core of Airflow. However, committers might decide to merge it
quickly and
uranusjr commented on pull request #17474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17474#issuecomment-895841252
We now have
* `from docker import types`
* `from docker.types import ...`
* `from docker.types.services import ...`
Around the same proximation. They
uranusjr edited a comment on pull request #17474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17474#issuecomment-895841252
We now have
* `from docker import types`
* `from docker.types import ...`
* `from docker.types.services import ...`
Around the same proximity. They
enima2684 commented on pull request #17474:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17474#issuecomment-895847448
Fixed the imports as asked :)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
potiuk edited a comment on pull request #17033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17033#issuecomment-895854216
We release all providers in waves in ~ 1 month cadence. Once this is merged
it will be included. The next wave is going to happen in ~ 1.5 - 2 weeks.
--
This is an
potiuk commented on pull request #17033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17033#issuecomment-895854216
We release all providers in waves in ~ 1 month cadence. Once this is merged
it will be included. The next wave is going to happen ~ 1.5 - 2 weeks.
--
This is an automated
ashb commented on a change in pull request #17100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17100#discussion_r681628602
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -2312,6 +2327,19 @@ def set_edge_info(self, upstream_task_id: str,
downstream_task_id: str, info: Ed
uranusjr commented on pull request #17502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17502#issuecomment-895789203
I think the timezone part will change. For example, if you’re in England,
2am without DST (Greenwich Mean Time) would be `02:00:00+00:00`, and 2am with
DST (British Summer
uranusjr commented on pull request #17502:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17502#issuecomment-895796041
> whether the `run_id` is generated in DST
This would be a bit difficult to determine unless the timezone
implementation correctly implements
sw1010 opened a new issue #17527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17527
**Apache Airflow version**: 2.1.2
**Apache Airflow Provider versions** (please include all providers that are
relevant to your bug):
apache-airflow-providers-ftp==2.0.0
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on issue #17527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17527#issuecomment-895811251
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue
template!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
stijndehaes edited a comment on issue #16625:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/16625#issuecomment-895776139
We noticed this issue with Airflow 2.1.2. Job went from queued to failed
without retry, looking at the code I am not sure how to fix it. It is clear
that in
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17528#issuecomment-895816244
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
amiriry commented on issue #17443:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17443#issuecomment-895825612
I did the command:
`docker exec $(docker ps | awk '/worker/ {print $NF}') airflow providers
list | grep elasticsearc`
The output:
`apache-airflow-providers-elasticsearch
yyhecust commented on a change in pull request #16475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16475#discussion_r685802843
##
File path: tests/jobs/test_backfill_job.py
##
@@ -929,8 +960,11 @@ def run_backfill(cond):
dag_maker.create_dagrun(
peter-volkov commented on pull request #17033:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17033#issuecomment-895848814
@potiuk how do we make a release of
https://pypi.org/project/apache-airflow-providers-yandex/
?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To
uranusjr commented on a change in pull request #17100:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17100#discussion_r685850326
##
File path: airflow/models/dag.py
##
@@ -2312,6 +2327,19 @@ def set_edge_info(self, upstream_task_id: str,
downstream_task_id: str, info: Ed
sw1010 opened a new pull request #17529:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17529
The json_client depends on httpx and thus the response doesn't contain
the attribute 'ok'. To fix the problem, the missing attribute has been
changed
to is_error.
closes: #17527
--
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17529:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17529#issuecomment-895885569
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
ephraimbuddy commented on issue #17370:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17370#issuecomment-895885489
> > > May be related with: #16625
> >
> >
> > If so, then it's resolved in #16301 which will be released in 2.1.3
>
> @ephraimbuddy I don't think that #16301
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #17519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17519#discussion_r685864333
##
File path: docs/apache-airflow/faq.rst
##
@@ -119,6 +119,18 @@ How do I trigger tasks based on another task's failure?
You can achieve this with
kaxil commented on pull request #17519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17519#issuecomment-895888005
> Might be worth mentioning this only helps with "simple" DAGs, e.g. if the
main DAG file itself actually changes. Not sure exactly how to phrase it in
this context, but this
kaxil opened a new pull request #17530:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17530
black 21.6b0 -> 21.7b0.
pyupgrade v2.21.0 -> v2.23.3.
yamllint v1.26.1 -> v1.26.2.
isort: 5.9.2 -> 5.9.3.
---
**^ Add meaningful description above**
Read the **[Pull
kaxil closed issue #17437:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17437
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kaxil merged pull request #17519:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17519
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 82229b3 Add XCom.clear so it's hookable in custom XCom backend
(#17405)
add 7dfc520 Doc: Add FAQ to speed
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17530:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17530#issuecomment-895905694
The PR is likely ready to be merged. No tests are needed as no important
environment files, nor python files were modified by it. However, committers
might decide
uranusjr closed pull request #17414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17414
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
github-actions[bot] commented on pull request #17529:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17529#issuecomment-895923724
The PR is likely OK to be merged with just subset of tests for default
Python and Database versions without running the full matrix of tests, because
it does not
thaysa closed issue #17481:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17481
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
kaxil closed issue #17527:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17527
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17529:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17529#issuecomment-895950473
Awesome work, congrats on your first merged pull request!
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log
kaxil merged pull request #17529:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17529
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 663f173 Update pre-commit hooks (#17530)
add fbddefe Fixed broken json_client (#17529)
No new revisions
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #15385:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/15385#discussion_r685937377
##
File path: airflow/security/permissions.py
##
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
RESOURCE_PLUGIN = "Plugins"
RESOURCE_PROVIDER = "Providers"
RESOURCE_ROLE = "Roles"
frankcash commented on pull request #17515:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17515#issuecomment-895961108
I have no problem with that, in-fact I thought about it. I just feel it
could be confusing as there already is a `RedshiftHook`
uranusjr commented on issue #17534:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17534#issuecomment-895987034
This is correct. Aifrlow has an implicit notion of *intervals*. For a DAG
started at 2021-07-29 and runs every day, it needs one initial day before
executing, so the initial run
uranusjr closed issue #17534:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/issues/17534
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
ephraimbuddy commented on a change in pull request #16475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16475#discussion_r685879899
##
File path: airflow/jobs/backfill_job.py
##
@@ -471,6 +476,13 @@ def _per_task_process(key, ti, session=None):
uranusjr commented on pull request #17414:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17414#issuecomment-895919125
OK I think this is good now.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
uranusjr merged pull request #17530:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17530
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
uranusjr pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from 7dfc520 Doc: Add FAQ to speed up parsing with tons of dag files
(#17519)
add 663f173 Update pre-commit
massamany opened a new pull request #17531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17531
When configuring the sql alchemy url like this :
```
sql_alchemy_conn = postgresql://user:password@localhost:/airflowdb
```
Then the Airflow shell can't be used, because the port is
boring-cyborg[bot] commented on pull request #17531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17531#issuecomment-895919947
Congratulations on your first Pull Request and welcome to the Apache Airflow
community! If you have any issues or are unsure about any anything please check
our
yyhecust commented on a change in pull request #16475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16475#discussion_r685929982
##
File path: airflow/jobs/backfill_job.py
##
@@ -471,6 +476,13 @@ def _per_task_process(key, ti, session=None):
kaxil merged pull request #17528:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17528
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from fbddefe Fixed broken json_client (#17529)
add f424780 Ignores exception raised during closing SSH
kaxil opened a new pull request #17532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17532
- Markdown was not formatted correctly in the in-line code-block
- Just adds single quotes around pip install as the square bracket errors
out on some terminals
---
**^ Add
kaxil merged pull request #17532:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17532
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository.
kaxilnaik pushed a change to branch main
in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/airflow.git.
from f424780 Ignores exception raised during closing SSH connection
(#17528)
add dec1e9d Minor README fixes
yyhecust commented on a change in pull request #16475:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/16475#discussion_r685942656
##
File path: airflow/jobs/backfill_job.py
##
@@ -471,6 +476,13 @@ def _per_task_process(key, ti, session=None):
kaxil commented on a change in pull request #17506:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17506#discussion_r685951621
##
File path: tests/conftest.py
##
@@ -484,3 +489,41 @@ def __call__(self, dag_id='test_dag', session=None,
**kwargs):
return self
massamany commented on pull request #17531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17531#issuecomment-895977218
> This PR is against v1-10-stable which has reached EOL currently.
https://github.com/apache/airflow#version-life-cycle
>
> Please check the "main" branch and PR
kaxil commented on pull request #17531:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/17531#issuecomment-895984895
> > This PR is against v1-10-stable which has reached EOL currently.
https://github.com/apache/airflow#version-life-cycle
> > Please check the "main" branch and PR against it
1 - 100 of 229 matches
Mail list logo
