vandonr-amz commented on PR #28816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28816#issuecomment-1397776181
@eladkal @uranusjr anything else you'd like changed with that PR ? Otherwise
we could merge it
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the
vandonr-amz commented on PR #28816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28816#issuecomment-1381159841
> * Can this be more-universal across the provider? There are likely
other operators that have the same thing, ISTR there are some EC2 operators.
I didn't find other
vandonr-amz commented on PR #28816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28816#issuecomment-1378016820
ok, made it accept a list or dict where meaningful, and added the missing
file.
It's also shipping a clandestine commit for now because it's stacked on top
of
vandonr-amz commented on PR #28816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28816#issuecomment-1377735626
oh so you mean we should always accept either preformated or as a dict. Yeah
why not, I can do that.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to
vandonr-amz commented on PR #28816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28816#issuecomment-1376598142
> @vandonr-amz One possible side effect of this change - I think Airflow
still can't render dictionaries keys if it templated value: #18938
However, I don't really see why
vandonr-amz commented on PR #28816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/airflow/pull/28816#issuecomment-1376589091
> @vandonr-amz One possible side effect of this change - I think Airflow
still can't render dictionaries keys if it templated value: #18938
wow that PR is an adventure... sad
