[GitHub] [fineract] vorburger commented on a change in pull request #1466: FINERACT-1241-elastic-web-hook

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
vorburger commented on a change in pull request #1466: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1466#discussion_r512955911 ## File path: fineract-provider/src/main/java/org/apache/fineract/infrastructure/hooks/processor/ElasticSearchHookProcessor.java ## @@ -0,0 +1,88 @@

[fineract] branch develop updated: FINERACT-1241-elastic-web-hook (#1466)

2020-10-27 Thread avikg
This is an automated email from the ASF dual-hosted git repository. avikg pushed a commit to branch develop in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/fineract.git The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/develop by this push: new 0a41cdc FINERACT-1241-elastic-web-hook

[GitHub] [fineract] avikganguly01 merged pull request #1466: FINERACT-1241-elastic-web-hook

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
avikganguly01 merged pull request #1466: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1466 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

[GitHub] [fineract] avikganguly01 commented on a change in pull request #1466: FINERACT-1241-elastic-web-hook

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
avikganguly01 commented on a change in pull request #1466: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1466#discussion_r512773604 ## File path: fineract-provider/src/main/java/org/apache/fineract/commands/service/SynchronousCommandProcessingService.java ## @@ -205,18 +225,80

[GitHub] [fineract] vidakovic commented on pull request #1422: FINERACT-1210: Swagger TypeScript client

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
vidakovic commented on pull request #1422: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1422#issuecomment-717139983 @vorburger I would merge as is, can't really hurt. And maybe it motivates someone to contribute a little sample to illustrate how this is supposed to be used... or I find

[GitHub] [fineract] vidakovic commented on pull request #1444: Introduce first "pure Spring" integration test, without Cargo (FINERACT-764)

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
vidakovic commented on pull request #1444: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1444#issuecomment-717137108 > @ptuomola @vidakovic I'm undecided / unclear where we should take this to.. thoughts? I guess we could... EITHER (probably best AFTER #1465 will have gone in): > >

[GitHub] [fineract] vorburger commented on pull request #1251: FINERACT-1095 Added status parameter in Loans API

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
vorburger commented on pull request #1251: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1251#issuecomment-717046148 @thesmallstar @ptuomola where were we with this one? Good to merge as-is, or updates needed? (Perhaps best to rebase it now.)

[GitHub] [fineract] vorburger commented on pull request #1156: Fineract-1058 added support for limit,offset and orderBy in SQLbuilder

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
vorburger commented on pull request #1156: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1156#issuecomment-717045470 @thesmallstar ping on this? This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the

[GitHub] [fineract] vorburger commented on pull request #1444: Introduce first "pure Spring" integration test, without Cargo (FINERACT-764)

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
vorburger commented on pull request #1444: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1444#issuecomment-717040235 BTW #1422 has some related thoughts re. our testing strategy, I'll comment over there as well. This is an

[GitHub] [fineract] vorburger commented on pull request #1444: Introduce first "pure Spring" integration test, without Cargo (FINERACT-764)

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
vorburger commented on pull request #1444: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1444#issuecomment-717039700 @ptuomola @vidakovic I'm undecided / unclear where we should take this to.. thoughts? I guess we could... EITHER (probably best AFTER #1465 will have gone in): a)

[GitHub] [fineract] vorburger commented on a change in pull request #1444: Introduce first "pure Spring" integration test, without Cargo (FINERACT-764)

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
vorburger commented on a change in pull request #1444: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1444#discussion_r512457801 ## File path: fineract-provider/src/test/java/org/apache/fineract/common/RestAssuredFixture.java ## @@ -34,14 +34,12 @@ private final int

[GitHub] [fineract] vorburger commented on pull request #1465: FINERACT-1209: Integration Tests using new Swagger Client API

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
vorburger commented on pull request #1465: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1465#issuecomment-717034392 > FYI: don't think this is related to my changes; before a run was failing on a different line (creating Docker images). Locally the integration tests worked ok; maybe the

[GitHub] [fineract] vorburger commented on a change in pull request #1361: FINERACT-1169 fixed credit bureau Loan-product mapping module

2020-10-27 Thread GitBox
vorburger commented on a change in pull request #1361: URL: https://github.com/apache/fineract/pull/1361#discussion_r512439405 ## File path: fineract-provider/src/main/resources/sql/migrations/core_db/V327__creditbureau_configuration.sql ## @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ CREATE TABLE