[GitHub] [incubator-mxnet] haojin2 commented on issue #15951: Revert "Numpy-compatible concatenate upstream"

2019-08-20 Thread GitBox
haojin2 commented on issue #15951: Revert "Numpy-compatible concatenate upstream" URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15951#issuecomment-523243342 @larroy I think the author of #13818 is @larroy , isn't it? I was quoting your comment:

[GitHub] [incubator-mxnet] haojin2 commented on issue #15951: Revert "Numpy-compatible concatenate upstream"

2019-08-20 Thread GitBox
haojin2 commented on issue #15951: Revert "Numpy-compatible concatenate upstream" URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15951#issuecomment-523207697 @larroy Please don't avoid my question, in #15952 you claimed that I shall tag you on any changes to files under CI folder, so

[GitHub] [incubator-mxnet] haojin2 commented on issue #15951: Revert "Numpy-compatible concatenate upstream"

2019-08-20 Thread GitBox
haojin2 commented on issue #15951: Revert "Numpy-compatible concatenate upstream" URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15951#issuecomment-523204837 @marcoabreu Maybe let's take a look at one unix-cpu

[GitHub] [incubator-mxnet] haojin2 commented on issue #15951: Revert "Numpy-compatible concatenate upstream"

2019-08-20 Thread GitBox
haojin2 commented on issue #15951: Revert "Numpy-compatible concatenate upstream" URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15951#issuecomment-523179089 @larroy So if you're really that actively in charge of CI stuff then why don't you root cause it while this very PR you guys

[GitHub] [incubator-mxnet] haojin2 commented on issue #15951: Revert "Numpy-compatible concatenate upstream"

2019-08-20 Thread GitBox
haojin2 commented on issue #15951: Revert "Numpy-compatible concatenate upstream" URL: https://github.com/apache/incubator-mxnet/pull/15951#issuecomment-523142933 I don't think that's a reasonable assumption. Firstly this PR passed CI several times already (since I rebase with master