[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15173857#comment-15173857
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
If this passes the selenium test in my patch I'm happy
> Update parameters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15166423#comment-15166423
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
I added some logging code to the GitHub project so you can see when
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15165660#comment-15165660
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
Ok... I still don't fully understand where the value is stored if not in the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15159224#comment-15159224
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
I guess it depends on what you mean by stored. In the case above
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15159059#comment-15159059
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
It seems there's a gap in my knowledge if this is true. Perhaps I need to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158978#comment-15158978
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
It's true if you want the object passed to the symbol binding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158933#comment-15158933
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
But your implementation would just ignore the new value? What's the point in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158923#comment-15158923
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
I'm not sure I understand the scenario you are describing. The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158896#comment-15158896
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
Your example project only demonstrates updating a prop binding from what I can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158881#comment-15158881
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
There are multiple things at play here. Here is how I think things
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158865#comment-15158865
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
That's a ridiculous implementation! Why would you let me set something that has
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158858#comment-15158858
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
That test case fails because it calls the set method and then calls
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158857#comment-15158857
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
I think you might be misunderstanding that bindings are determined as the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158847#comment-15158847
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
Ok it' the patch test case that fails. I'll take a look
> Update
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158842#comment-15158842
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
The patch includes a selenium test called MutableLiteralDemo which updates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158837#comment-15158837
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
I don't have 5.4 on my machine to build. What test cases fail?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158832#comment-15158832
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
Please apply the patch attached to this issues but comment out the binding
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158816#comment-15158816
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
It's true a call to get on the literal binding will return the old
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158528#comment-15158528
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
Until you find a place to store the new value. I think that throwing exception
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15158053#comment-15158053
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
My understanding of the binding interface is the set method's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15157686#comment-15157686
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
This is still an issue in 5.4. The question is what should happen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13795640#comment-13795640
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
More discussion here:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13614313#comment-13614313
]
Barry Books commented on TAP5-2099:
---
While I'm all for fixing the read only parameter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13614328#comment-13614328
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
It's not really that literal:1 is returning something other than
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13612546#comment-13612546
]
Jochen Kemnade commented on TAP5-2099:
--
I propose that literal and symbol bindings
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAP5-2099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13612561#comment-13612561
]
Lance commented on TAP5-2099:
-
I'm not sure I agree with you here... with prop: bindings, you
26 matches
Mail list logo
