Congratulations Mukund!!!
Thanks
Sunil
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:48 AM Vinayakumar B
wrote:
> On behalf of the Apache Hadoop PMC, I am pleased to announce that Mukund
> Thakur (mthakur) has accepted the PMC's invitation to become a PMC member
> on
> the project. We appreciate all of Mukund’s
hadoop-sls is used for perf tests.
Thanks
Sunil
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 11:57 AM Owen O'Malley
wrote:
> We really need input from the users as well. In trunk, hadoop-ozone and
> hadoop-ant are already gone.
>
> Used:
> hadoop-aliyun
> hadoop-aws
> hadoop-distcp
> hadoop-azure-datalake
>
Hi All,
We are getting the below error in recent runs.
-1. yetus. 0m 8s. Unprocessed flag(s): --findbugs-strict-precheck
https://ci-hadoop.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/636/console
Are there any knows issues or some workarounds?
Please advise.
Thanks
Sunil
Hi Wei-Chiu,
What will be the next steps here for 3.3.1 planning?
Thanks
Sunil
On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:56 PM Stack wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2021 at 6:41 AM Steve Loughran >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > Regarding blockers : how about we have a little hackathon where we try
> > and get things in. This
y! This release is a direct result of your great
> contributions.
>
> Many thanks to everyone who helped in this release process!
>
> Many thanks to Sunil Govindan, Wei-Chiu Chuang, Chao Sun, Steve Loughran
> and other folks who continued helps for this release process.
>
> [1] https:/
+1 (binding)
- Verified the checksums and signatures
- Built from source
- Ran a few MR jobs
- Verified RM UI
Thanks
Sunil
On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 8:10 PM Xiaoqiao He wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The release candidate (RC5) for Hadoop-3.2.2 is available now.
> There are 4 commits[1] differences
gt;>
>>> > I put up a patch for
>>> >
>>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__issues.apache.org_jira_browse_YARN-2D10540=DwIFaQ=sWW_bEwW_mLyN3Kx2v57Q8e-CRbmiT9yOhqES_g_wVY=KVdP1SUmHYb-tZP8tcigmw=WEMl9mt9SZiq7P20DPgeZO69TFwf3d0eldQGRWlLyQg=FdkrkiW
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 11:07 PM Sunil Govindan wrote:
> Thanks, Xiaoqiao.
> All files are looking good.
>
> However, while I did the tests to verify the RC, I ran into a serious NPE
> in YARN.
> I raised YARN-10540 <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-10540> to
> an
2020 at 5:36 PM Xiaoqiao He wrote:
> Thanks Sunil, md5 files have been removed from RC4. Please have a look.
> Thanks & Regards.
>
> - He Xiaoqiao
>
> On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 7:22 PM Sunil Govindan wrote:
>
>> Hi Xiaoqiao,
>>
>> Please remove the md5
Hi Xiaoqiao,
Please remove the md5 files from your shared RC4 repo. Thanks, @Akira
Ajisaka for sharing this input.
Thanks
Sunil
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:21 AM Sunil Govindan wrote:
> Reference:
> https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html#sigs-and-sums
> Also, we h
Reference:
https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution.html#sigs-and-sums
Also, we had a Jira to track this HADOOP-15930
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15930>.
Thanks
Sunil
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 10:16 AM Sunil Govindan wrote:
> Hi Xiaoqiao and Wei-chiu
>
Hi Xiaoqiao and Wei-chiu
I am a bit confused after seeing both *.sha512 and *.md5 files in the RC
directory.
Are we releasing both now?
Thanks
Sunil
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 10:32 PM Xiaoqiao He wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> The release candidate (RC4) for Hadoop-3.2.2 is available now.
> There are 10
Thanks Akira. I just saw that the revert of HADOOP-17306 is now pushed to
the 3.2.2 branch as well.
Let's do one more RC. Thanks @Xiaoqiao He for
helping.
Thanks
Sunil
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 6:58 AM Akira Ajisaka wrote:
> -1
>
> - YARN resource localization is broken by HADOOP-17306 and it
> >> > +
> >> 3.2.3-SNAPSHOT
> >>
> >>
> >> Try to grep '3.2.2-SNAPSHOT' in the whole project and not found anymore,
> >> try to compile branch-3.2 at local and pass.
> >> Please give another review if convenient.
> >>
> >
;
> Eric
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 6:43 AM Sunil Govindan wrote:
>
>> Looks good to me.
>>
>> Thanks Xiaoquio.
>>
>> + Sunil
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:36 PM Xiaoqiao He
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Thanks Sunil for your remin
f you have time.
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1] https://github.com/apache/hadoop/commits/branch-3.2.2
> [2] https://github.com/apache/hadoop/commits/branch-3.2
>
> On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 12:03 PM Sunil Govindan wrote:
>
>> Thank you
>>
>> Did we also cut the branch already ?
&
Thank you
Did we also cut the branch already ?
Sunil
On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 9:14 AM, Xiaoqiao He wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> All issues targeted to 3.2.2 have been resolved from now on[1], Thanks
> everyone for your works.
> Will try to operate code frozen and create the release candidate today.
>
+1 (binding)
- verified checksum and sign. Shows as a Good signature from "Masatake
Iwasaki (CODE SIGNING KEY) "
- built from source
- ran basic MR job and looks good
- UI also seems fine
Thanks,
Sunil
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 11:38 AM Masatake Iwasaki <
iwasak...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote:
>
Thanks.
I will verify the release.
Sunil
On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 12:26 AM Wei-Chiu Chuang wrote:
> Masatake is doing a great job rolling out 2.10.1 RC0. Let's give him a
> final push to get it out.
>
> Thanks,
> Wei-Chiu
>
Hi Xiaoqiao,
Thanks for volunteering.
I could help to guide you through the process.
Thanks,
Sunil
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 9:09 AM Xiaoqiao He wrote:
> Thanks Wei-Chiu for initiating this.
>
> It's been nearly a year since Hadoop-3.2.1 released(2019 Sep 22).
>
> We have several important fixes
+1
Thanks
Sunil
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:49 PM Xiaoqiao He wrote:
> +1 for putting 2.9 release lines to EOL.
>
> Thanks,
> Hexiaoqiao
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 3:14 PM Mingliang Liu wrote:
>
>> +1 for putting 2.9 lines to EOL.
>>
>> Let's focus on 2.10 releases for Hadoop 2. Also is there
Hi folks
great to see the participation and thanks all for joining!
@Wei-Chiu Chuang 3.1 is one of the stable line along
with 3.2
As we are moving to a stable 3.3, we should start to visit the fate of 3.1
by end of this year and early next year.
Thanks
Sunil
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 11:17 AM
+1 for initiating this!
Sunil
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 10:50 PM Owen O'Malley
wrote:
> We unfortunately have a lot of master/slave and whitelist/blacklist
> terminology usage in Hadoop. It will take a while to fix them all, but one
> is easy to fix. In particular, we have a "master" branch that
+1
Thanks
Sunil
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 1:23 PM Elek, Marton wrote:
>
>
> I would like to start a discussion to make a separate Apache project for
> Ozone
>
>
>
> ### HISTORY [1]
>
> * Apache Hadoop Ozone development started on a feature branch of
> Hadoop repository (HDFS-7240)
>
> * In
Yes, lets wait till weekend as I can see progress in these blockers.
Thanks
Sunil
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:35 AM Brahma Reddy Battula
wrote:
> Sure, I will do that.
>
> Since blockers are not closed, I didn't cut the branch because
> multiple branches might confuse or sombody might miss to
t; > Thanks,
> > Akira
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 8:21 PM Akira Ajisaka
> wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks Sunil for the report.
> >>
> >> The precommit jobs are failing to add comments to GitHub also.
> >> I'm looking into the cause, an
Hello
>From last few days, jenkins results are not getting published in jiras.
For eg, https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-YARN-Build/25735/console has
results. but I cannot see the same in YARN-9879. Similarly in the cases
of YARN-10198 etc.
I could see a message in console o/p as "Adding
Hi Wei-Chiu
Extremely sorry for the late reply here.
Cud u pls help to add more clarity on defining what will happen for
branch-2.8 when we call EOL.
Does this mean that, no more release coming out from this branch, or some
more additional guidelines?
- Sunil
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 11:47 PM
Hi Folks,
hadoop-kafka module seems using a very old version of kafka (0.8.2.1). This
causes a lot of conflicts while using together for a build.
Few questions/proposals here:
1. If there are no usage for this old version of kafka module, could this
module be removed from hadoop repo?
2. Given
+1 on this to remove staleness.
- Sunil
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 12:51 PM Akira Ajisaka wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Both Ozone and Apache Submarine have separate repositories.
> Can we remove these modules from hadoop-trunk?
>
> Regards,
> Akira
>
Bumping up this thread again for feedback.
@Zhankun Tang is now waiting for a confirmation to
complete 3.1.3 release publish activities.
- Sunil
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 11:03 AM Sunil Govindan wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> At present,
> http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/ point
Hi Folks,
At present,
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable/ points to *Apache Hadoop 3.2.1*
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current/ points to *Apache Hadoop 3.2.1*
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/stable2/ points to *Apache Hadoop 2.9.2*
http://hadoop.apache.org/docs/current2/ points to *Apache
+1 (binding)
Thanks Zhankun for putting up the release. Thanks for leading this.
- verified signature
- ran a local cluster from tar ball
- ran some MR jobs
- perform CLI ops, and looks good
- UI seems fine
Thanks
Sunil
On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:34 PM Zhankun Tang wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
Hi Rohith
Thanks for putting this together, appreciate the same.
+1 (binding)
- verified signature
- brought up a cluster from the tar ball
- Ran some basic MR jobs
- RM UI seems fine (old and new)
Thanks
Sunil
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:56 PM Rohith Sharma K S <
rohithsharm...@apache.org>
+1 to the proposal.
Thanks to the community for the great response.
- Sunil
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 10:49 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As we discussed in the previous thread [1],
>
> I just moved the spin-off proposal to CWIKI and completed all TODO parts.
>
>
>
Thanks Vinay for starting the thread.
I agree to Anu's view point related to protobuf. And with the suggestion
pointed out by Duo Zhang, if we can make use
of org.xolstice.maven.plugins:protobuf-maven-plugin, our upgrade to 3.0.0
of protobuf will also be more easier.
However i think its better
+1
- Sunil
On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 7:36 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> This is a voting thread to move Submarine source code, documentation from
> Hadoop repo to a separate Apache Git repo. Which is based on discussions of
>
>
Thanks Wangda for sharing the thoughts.
I agree with the idea of new repo for more cleaner code base and remove
additional dependencies, jenkins etc.
One major point from my end is that the commits to new repo ideally should
happen from committers or branch committers.
As hadoop community, we
+1
- Sunil
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 8:33 AM Wangda Tan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This is a vote thread to mark any versions smaller than 2.7 (inclusive),
> and 3.0 EOL. This is based on discussions of [1]
>
> This discussion runs for 7 days and will conclude on Aug 28 Wed.
>
> Please feel free to
Hi Xun,
Thanks for the proposal. Altogether this proposal makes sense to me.
IIUC, an external repo is created and developers found more productive in
that because of faster reviews and commits.
To do more this apache way,
1. I think its better we track all this in apache jira (apparently this
Hi All
INFRA-18777 is closed and github UI has disabled #1 and #3. Only Squash and
Merge is possible.
Could we start using this option (merge from UI) from now onwards ?
- Sunil
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 10:24 AM Bharat Viswanadham
wrote:
> +1 for squash and merge.
>
> And if we use Github UI,
Hi Eric
This community meeting will be starting from next week onwards
- Sunil
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 9:14 PM Eric Badger
wrote:
> Is there a YARN call today (in 16 minutes)? I saw it on the calendar until
> a few minutes ago.
>
> Eric
>
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 11:18 PM Wangda Tan wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15668?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sunil Govindan resolved HADOOP-15668.
-
Resolution: Not A Problem
Closed with correct status
> mvn test goal fails on HAD
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-15483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sunil Govindan reopened HADOOP-15483:
-
Reopening to run jenkins
> Upgrade jquery to version 3.
44 matches
Mail list logo
