Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-07 Thread Steve Loughran
thanks. now looking at a critical kerby CVE ( https://github.com/apache/hadoop/pull/5458) and revisited one for netty from last week i am never a fan of last-minute jar updates, but if we don't ship with them we will be fielding jiras of "update kerby/netty on 3.3.5" for the next 18 months On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-06 Thread Erik Krogen
> OK. Could you have a go with a (locally built) patch release Just validated the same on the latest HEAD of branch-3.3.5, which includes the two HDFS Jiras I mentioned plus one additional one: * 143fe8095d4 (HEAD -> branch-3.3.5) 2023-03-06 HDFS-16934. TestDFSAdmin.testAllDatanodesReconfig

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-06 Thread Steve Loughran
i looked at that test and wondered if it it was just being brittle to time. I'm not a fan of those -there's one in abfs which is particularly bad for me- maybe we could see if the test can be cut as it is quite a slow one On Sat, 4 Mar 2023 at 18:28, Viraj Jasani wrote: > A minor update on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-04 Thread Viraj Jasani
A minor update on ITestS3AConcurrentOps#testParallelRename I was previously connected to a vpn due to which bandwidth was getting throttled earlier. Ran the test again today without vpn and had no issues (earlier only 40% of the overall putObject were able to get completed within timeout). On

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-04 Thread Steve Loughran
On Sat, 4 Mar 2023 at 01:47, Erik Krogen wrote: > Thanks Steve. I see now that the branch cut was way back in October so I > definitely understand your frustration here! > > This made me realize that HDFS-16832 > , which resolves a very > similar

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-03 Thread Erik Krogen
Thanks Steve. I see now that the branch cut was way back in October so I definitely understand your frustration here! This made me realize that HDFS-16832 , which resolves a very similar issue as the aforementioned HDFS-16923, is also missing from

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-03 Thread Steve Loughran
shipping broken hdfs isn't something we'd want to do, but if we can be confident that all other issues can be addressed in RC3 then I'd be happy. On Fri, 3 Mar 2023 at 05:09, Ayush Saxena wrote: > I will highlight that I am completely fed up with doing this release and >> really want to get it

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-02 Thread Ayush Saxena
> > I will highlight that I am completely fed up with doing this release and > really want to get it out the way -for which I depend on support from as > many other developers as possible. hmm, I can feel the pain. I tried to find if there is any config or any workaround which can dodge this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-02 Thread Viraj Jasani
While this RC is not going to be final, I just wanted to share the results of the testing I have done so far with RC1 and RC2. * Signature: ok * Checksum : ok * Rat check (1.8.0_341): ok - mvn clean apache-rat:check * Built from source (1.8.0_341): ok - mvn clean install -DskipTests * Built

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-02 Thread Steve Loughran
well, lets see what others say. we don't want to ship stuff with serious regression to hdfs. I will highlight that I am completely fed up with doing this release and really want to get it out the way -for which I depend on support from as many other developers as possible. Erik, right now what

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 3.3.5 (RC2)

2023-03-01 Thread Erik Krogen
Hi folks, apologies for being late to the release conversation, but I think we need to get HDFS-16923 into 3.3.5. HDFS-16732 , which also went into 3.3.5, introduced an issue whereby Observer