1. HDFS-7446 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-7446 : HDFS
inotify should have the ability to determine what txid it has read up to
This is also marked for 2.6.1, but this changes the client protocol and
protobuf messages.
Please confirm whether this is Compatible change with
I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an incompatible
change.
On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth cnaur...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786. Since this
is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow
The HADOOP-10786 patch is compatible with JDK 6. This was a point of
discussion during the original development of the patch. If you'd like
full details, please see the comments there. Like Akira, I also confirmed
that the new test works correctly when running with JDK 6.
Thanks!
--Chris
Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on
ajisakaa/common-merge branch with JDK6.
I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the
jiras.
Thanks,
Akira
On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
I hope someone tests this against JDK6,
+1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki.
Thanks,
Akira
On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote:
I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786. Since this
is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
too.
This bug was originally reported
I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786. Since this
is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email
too.
This bug was originally reported with JDK 8. A code change in JDK 8 broke
our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change
Put the list here: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes.
And started figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks.
Thanks
+Vinod
On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@apache.orgmailto:vino...@apache.org wrote:
(2) With Wangda's help offline, I
This is done.
Thanks
+Vinod
On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@apache.orgmailto:vino...@apache.org wrote:
(1) Create 2.6.1 branch and prep branch-2.6 for 2.6.2. I am doing this today.
It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it.
It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out,
HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
vino...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I
I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in 2.7.0.
Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists.
I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If you want
it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure out the why
10 matches
Mail list logo