On Sep 28, 2009, at 3:15 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
It is really nice to have wire-compatibility between clients and
servers
running different versions of hadoop. The reason we would like
this is
because we can allow the same client (Hive, etc) submit jobs to two
I think we should not require Job Q compatibility for 1.0 release.
thanks,
dhruba
On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:06 AM, Sanjay Radia sra...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Sep 28, 2009, at 3:15 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
Dhruba Borthakur wrote:
It is really nice to have wire-compatibility between
On 9/25/09 10:13 AM, Dhruba Borthakur dhr...@gmail.com wrote:
It is really nice to have wire-compatibility between clients and servers
running different versions of hadoop. The reason we would like this is
because we can allow the same client (Hive, etc) submit jobs to two
different clusters
On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On 9/25/09 10:13 AM, Dhruba Borthakur dhr...@gmail.com wrote:
It is really nice to have wire-compatibility between clients and
servers
running different versions of hadoop. The reason we would like
this is
because we can allow the
On 9/25/09 12:44 PM, Sanjay Radia sra...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
On Sep 25, 2009, at 12:03 PM, Allen Wittenauer wrote:
On 9/25/09 10:13 AM, Dhruba Borthakur dhr...@gmail.com wrote:
It is really nice to have wire-compatibility between clients and
servers
running different versions of
Sanjay Radia wrote:
No. The 1.0 proposal was that it included both API and wire compatibility.
The proposal includes a lot of things, but it's so far just a proposal.
There's been no vote to formally define what 1.0 will mean. In every
discussion I've heard, from the very beginning of the
