Re: Review Request: HADOOP-7328. Improve the SerializationFactory functions.

2011-06-16 Thread Harsh J
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/ --- (Updated 2011-06-16 12:13:34.081758) Review request for hadoop-common and Todd Li

Re: Review Request: HADOOP-7328. Improve the SerializationFactory functions.

2011-06-14 Thread Harsh J
ue to the libs missing from the actual jvm that executes the job? > > Sudhan S > > -Original Message- > From: Harsh J [mailto:ha...@cloudera.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 12:42 AM > To: Todd Lipcon > Cc: hadoop-common; Harsh J; Matt Foley > Subject: Re: Revi

RE: Review Request: HADOOP-7328. Improve the SerializationFactory functions.

2011-06-14 Thread Sudharsan Sampath
to:ha...@cloudera.com] Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 12:42 AM To: Todd Lipcon Cc: hadoop-common; Harsh J; Matt Foley Subject: Re: Review Request: HADOOP-7328. Improve the SerializationFactory functions. > On 2011-06-13 18:23:35, Matt Foley wrote: > > Sorry if this is out of context, but is

Re: Review Request: HADOOP-7328. Improve the SerializationFactory functions.

2011-06-13 Thread Harsh J
> On 2011-06-13 18:23:35, Matt Foley wrote: > > Sorry if this is out of context, but is it really best to also return a > > null here? Shouldn't it check for null result from getSerialization(), > > then throw a (non-NPE) exception? Or do you prefer to do that check and > > throw at a higher

Re: Review Request: HADOOP-7328. Improve the SerializationFactory functions.

2011-06-13 Thread Todd Lipcon
> On 2011-06-13 18:23:35, Matt Foley wrote: > > Sorry if this is out of context, but is it really best to also return a > > null here? Shouldn't it check for null result from getSerialization(), > > then throw a (non-NPE) exception? Or do you prefer to do that check and > > throw at a higher

Re: Review Request: HADOOP-7328. Improve the SerializationFactory functions.

2011-06-13 Thread Matt Foley
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/#review817 --- Sorry if this is out of context, but is it really best to also return a

Re: Review Request: HADOOP-7328. Improve the SerializationFactory functions.

2011-06-11 Thread Harsh J
> On 2011-06-12 02:24:55, Todd Lipcon wrote: > > Looks good to me. Can you upload this rev of the patch to the JIRA so the > > QA Bot runs on it? Submitted on JIRA. Thanks for the review Todd! - Harsh --- This is an automatically gener

Re: Review Request: HADOOP-7328. Improve the SerializationFactory functions.

2011-06-11 Thread Todd Lipcon
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/#review805 --- Ship it! Looks good to me. Can you upload this rev of the patch to the

Review Request: HADOOP-7328. Improve the SerializationFactory functions.

2011-06-11 Thread Harsh Chouraria
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/884/ --- Review request for hadoop-common and Todd Lipcon. Summary --- Since getSeria