Re: [VOTE] Merge feature branch YARN-5355 (Timeline Service v2) to trunk

+1 I helped deploy and run the ATSv2 aux service on a cluster with ~400 node managers on it. I also verified that ATSv2 has no significant impact when disabled. Nice work everyone! On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 6:17 AM, Aaron Gresch wrote: > +1 non-binding > > I did some testing

[jira] [Resolved] (HADOOP-8095) -libjars option does not accept multiple jar files

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-8095?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Chris Trezzo resolved HADOOP-8095. -- Resolution: Won't Fix Resolving this jira as it is very old and this issue has been fixed

Re: Not be able to receive notification mail for watch JIRA (YARN)

Thanks Ted! I am receiving new notifications now. On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:12 AM, Ted Yu <yuzhih...@gmail.com> wrote: > The ticket has been resolved. > > You should be able to receive notifications now. > > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 11:05 AM, Chris Trezzo <

Re: Not be able to receive notification mail for watch JIRA (YARN)

There seems to be an issue with JIRA notifications again. I see this INFRA ticket filed for HBase: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13374 I have left a comment for what I am seeing with my current watched jiras on the YARN project. On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Brahma Reddy Battula

Re: [VOTE] Release cadence and EOL

Thanks Sangjin for pushing this forward! I have a few questions: 1. What is the definition of end-of-life for a release in the hadoop project? My current understanding is as follows: When a release line reaches end-of-life, there are no more planned releases for that line. Committers are no

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.5 (RC0)

tory.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachehadoop-1048/ > . > > > > You can find my public key at > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/hadoop/common/dist/KEYS. > > > > Please try the release and vote. The vote will run for the usual 5 days. > > Huge thanks to

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

gt;> We'll cut the release branch shortly after that. If you have any critical >> change that should be made part of 2.6.5 (CVE patches included), please >> reach out to us and commit the changes. If all things go well, we'd like to >> cut the branch in a few days. >> >

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

and volunteer to backport one of the issues. As always, please let me know if you have any questions or feel that I have missed something. Thank you! Chris Trezzo On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Allen Wittenauer <a...@effectivemachines.com > wrote: > > > On Aug 12, 2016, at 8:19 AM

Re: adding contributor roles timing out again

Thanks Chris! On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Chris Nauroth <cnaur...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Chris, I have taken care of adding you in the Contributors role on the > HADOOP project. > > > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > *From: *Chris Trezzo <ctre...@gmail

Re: adding contributor roles timing out again

Would it be possible for someone to add myself (username: ctrezzo)? It looks like I am not on the list and can not edit jiras in the HADOOP project. Thank you! On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 1:20 AM, Weiqing Yang wrote: > Thanks a lot, Chris and Steve! > > > > > On 8/21/16, 6:38

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

when we release 2.6.5. As always, please let me know if I have missed something. Thanks! Chris Trezzo On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Karthik Kambatla <ka...@cloudera.com> wrote: > Since there is sufficient interest in 2.6.5, we should probably do it. All > the reasons Allen outline

Re: [Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

BTW, I agree with Jason that HADOOP-13362 is not needed for branch-2.6 > unless we backport container metrics related patches there. > > > Thanks, > > Junping > > From: Jason Lowe <jl...@yahoo-inc.com.INVALID>

[Release thread] 2.6.5 release activities

s that you think I have missed. This was just an initial high-level triage, so there could definitely be issues that are miss-labeled. As a side note: we still need to look at the pre-commit build for 2.6 and follow up with an addendum for HADOOP-12800. Thanks everyone! Chris Trezzo

Re: [DISCUSS] 2.6.x line releases

Sangjin, I would be happy to help you with the work for cutting 2.6.5. Thanks! Chris Trezzo On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Akira AJISAKA <ajisa...@oss.nttdata.co.jp> wrote: > Hi Sangjin, > > I'm thinking it's time for 2.6.5 release. Now there are 51 fixed issues in > 2.

Re: 2.7.3 release plan

rom branch-2 and definitely 2.7.3 as it stands > today. > > +Vinod > > > > On Apr 1, 2016, at 2:54 PM, Chris Trezzo <ctre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > A few thoughts: > > > > 1. To echo Andrew Wang, HDFS-8578 (parallel upgrades) should be a > > prer

Re: 2.7.3 release plan

A few thoughts: 1. To echo Andrew Wang, HDFS-8578 (parallel upgrades) should be a prerequisite for HDFS-8791. Without that patch, upgrades can be very slow for data nodes depending on your setup. 2. We have already deployed this patch internally so, with my Twitter hat on, I would be perfectly

Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x

Thanks Junping for the clarification! It was not my intention to violate the rules. I would be happy to work with you and help you manage the release in whatever way is most effective. Chris On Wednesday, November 18, 2015, Junping Du <j...@hortonworks.com> wrote: > Thanks Chr

Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x

Hi Sangjin, I would be happy to volunteer to work with you as a release manager for 2.6.3. Shooting for a time in early December seems reasonable to me. I also agree that if we miss that window, January would be the next best option. Thanks, Chris On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Sangjin Lee

Re: Thinking ahead to hadoop-2.6

I would like to see the shared cache (YARN-1492) make it in as well. We are going through the final review process (with Karthik and Vinod) and should be fairly close to complete. This is another feature that has been under development for a while. Thanks, Chris On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 4:00 PM,