Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x

I see 18 JIRAs across the sub-projects as of now in 2.6.3. Seems like we will have a reasonable number of fixes if we start an RC early december. In the mean while, we should also review 2.7.3 and 2.8.0 blocker / critical list and see if it makes sense to backport any of those into 2.6.3.

Re: [DISCUSS] Looking to a 2.8.0 release

e 3.x line. -C On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Vinod Vavilapalli <vino...@hortonworks.com<mailto:vino...@hortonworks.com>> wrote: As you may have noted, 2.8.0 got completely derailed what with 2.7.x and the unusually long 2.6.1 release. With 2.6.1 out of the way, and two paralle

Re: [DISCUSS] Looking to a 2.8.0 release

I’ll let others comment on specific features. Regarding the 3.x vs 2.x point, as I noted before on other threads, given all the incompatibilities in trunk it will be ways off before users can run their production workloads on a 3.x release. Therefore, as I was proposing before, we should

Re: Planning Apache Hadoop 2.7.2

Just committed the last of the critical issues. Starting the release process now. Thanks +Vinod On Nov 3, 2015, at 3:24 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > wrote: I’m closing down 2.7.2 now, almost there. Created a new branch-2.7.2 for the

Re: 2.7.2 release plan

Feel free to go ahead and get this in, I am still waiting on a couple of other JIRAs. Thanks +Vinod On Nov 2, 2015, at 12:24 AM, Wangda Tan > wrote: I marked YARN-3136 to 2.7.2-candidate, and I suggest to delay other changes to 2.8.0 release.

Re: Planning Apache Hadoop 2.7.2

Got this count a bit wrong: - There are 13 tickets marked against 2.7.2 but only committed to 2.8.0 - There are 10 tickets resolved without a patch - duplicates / invalids etc. - There are 77 patches marked and committed to 2.7.2. - There are a whole bunch of unresolved tickets in that 112

Re: Planning Apache Hadoop 2.7.2

I’m closing down 2.7.2 now, almost there. Created a new branch-2.7.2 for the release so that any 2.7.3 patches can go into branch-2.7 directly. Please reach out to me if you have any questions. Thanks +Vinod On Nov 2, 2015, at 2:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli

Re: continuing releases on Apache Hadoop 2.6.x

Just to stress on the following, it is very important that any critical bug-fixes that we push into 2.8.0 or even trunk, we should consider them for 2.6.3 and 2.7.3 if it makes sense. This is the only way we can avoid extremely long release cycles like that of 2.6.1. Also, to clarify a little,

Re: Github integration for Hadoop

Don’t think we need a vote. If someone can demonstrate how this works end-to-end, and enough folks find it useful, we can start using it. There is no need for a mandate. +Vinod > On Oct 29, 2015, at 12:01 PM, Xiaoyu Yao wrote: > > +1, should we start a vote on this? >

Re: 2.7.2 release plan

gt; <mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org>; Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > <vino...@apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 2:39 AM > Subject: Re: 2.7.2 release plan > > Vinod and Chris, > > Thanks for your reply. I'll do also backport not only bug fixes but > al

Re: 2.7.2 release plan

Nauroth <cnaur...@hortonworks.com>; "yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org" >> <yarn-...@hadoop.apache.org>; "hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org" >> <hdfs-...@hadoop.apache.org>; "mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org" >> <mapreduce-...

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.2

Hi, I checked 2.6.2-RC0, based on my check-list: - Signatures and message digests all are good in general. - The top level full LICENSE, NOTICE and README for the source artifacts are good - CHANGES.txt for common, hdfs and mapped are correctly located. - Able to build the tars out of the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.2

This is done: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/hadoop/common/KEYS is updated with Sangjin’s keys now. Thanks +Vinod On Oct 26, 2015, at 2:06 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > wrote: I will get his KEYS committed right-away

Re: Planning Apache Hadoop 2.7.2

Got swamped again. We already have about 112 patches in 2.7.2 already. There are 15 open tickets in progress. I’ll push progress on them for an RC towards end of this week. Thanks +Vinod On Sep 25, 2015, at 3:27 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli >

Re: 2.7.2 release plan

+1. Thanks +Vinod > On Jul 16, 2015, at 8:18 AM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > > I'd be comfortable with inclusion of any doc-only patch in minor releases. > There is a lot of value to end users in pushing documentation fixes as > quickly as possible, and they don't bear the

Re: [DISCUSS] About the details of JDK-8 support

If you see the community discussion thread on 2.8, my proposal was to support *both* JDK 7 and JDK 8 first. The last time we had discussion about dropping JDKs it wasn’t fun, so let’s not go there for now. In terms of runtime support for JDK 8, yes, there is vast evidence that things already

Re: Planning for Apache Hadoop 2.6.2

+1. Please take it over, I’ll standby for any help needed. Thanks +Vinod On Sep 24, 2015, at 11:34 AM, Sangjin Lee > wrote: I'd like to volunteer as the release manager for 2.6.2 unless there is an objection.

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1

The website and mirrors updates came back. Sending out an announcement now. Thanks +Vinod On Sep 23, 2015, at 4:59 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > wrote: Done with all the release activities. Waiting for the bits to propagate to all the

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1

Tx Eric, given the long cycle for 2.6.1, I’ll put MAPREDUCE-6334 into 2.6.2. Thanks +Vinod On Sep 21, 2015, at 11:19 AM, Eric Payne > wrote: Hi Vinod and everyone else who helped on this release! Thank you very much for going through

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1

I’ve been out sick for a while, so couldn’t close this in time. Doing so now. +Vinod On Sep 16, 2015, at 7:10 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > wrote: Hi all, After a nearly month long [1] toil, with loads of help from Sangjin Lee and Akira Ajisaka,

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1

Here’s my +1 to conclude the vote. With 5 binding +1s (Xuan, Jian, Junping, Karthik, myself), 8 non-binding +1s (Wangda, Sanjin, Rohith, Brahma, Mit, Akira, Tsuyoshi, Masatake ), 4 non-committal yes’s (Ted, Eric, Chang, Kuhu), this vote passes. I’ll push out the bits. Thanks to everyone who

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC1

Done with all the release activities. Waiting for the bits to propagate to all the mirrors. Thanks +Vinod On Sep 23, 2015, at 1:18 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli > wrote: Here’s my +1 to conclude the vote. With 5 binding +1s (Xuan, Jian,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Hadoop 2.6.1 RC0

Thanks for the verification Nick! Regarding that one issue, we saw this before itself in 2.7 and deemed it to be a compatible change given the expected usage of the API. The error in your report is “a client class C is not abstract and does not override abstract method in