Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

The HADOOP-10786 patch is compatible with JDK 6. This was a point of discussion during the original development of the patch. If you'd like full details, please see the comments there. Like Akira, I also confirmed that the new test works correctly when running with JDK 6. Thanks! --Chris Nauro

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

Good point. I ran the regression test in HADOOP-10786 successfully on "ajisakaa/common-merge" branch with JDK6. I'll run all the unit tests against JDK6 locally after merging all the jiras. Thanks, Akira On 8/14/15 23:21, Allen Wittenauer wrote: I hope someone tests this against JDK6, othe

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

I hope someone tests this against JDK6, otherwise this is an incompatible change. On Aug 12, 2015, at 2:21 PM, Chris Nauroth wrote: > I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786. Since this > is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email > too. >

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

1. HDFS-7446 : HDFS inotify should have the ability to determine what txid it has read up to This is also marked for 2.6.1, but this changes the client protocol and protobuf messages. Please confirm whether this is Compatible change with 2.

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

+1 for including HADOOP-10786. I've update the wiki. Thanks, Akira On 8/13/15 06:21, Chris Nauroth wrote: I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786. Since this is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email too. This bug was originally reported wi

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

I've just applied the 2.6.1-candidate label to HADOOP-10786. Since this is somewhat late in the process, I thought I'd better follow up over email too. This bug was originally reported with JDK 8. A code change in JDK 8 broke our automatic relogin from a Kerberos keytab, and we needed to change

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

It might have been because we thought that HDFS-7704 was going to make it. It's both make it or neither does. Now that we know HDFS-7704 is out, HDFS-7916 should definitely be out. I hope that clarifies. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 6:26 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli < vino...@hortonworks.com> wrote: >

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

I earlier removed HDFS-7916 from the list given HDFS-7704 was only in 2.7.0. Chris Trezzo added it back and so it appeared in my lists. I removed it again, Chris, please comment on why you added it back. If you want it included, please comment here and we can add it after we figure out the why

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

Could you double check HDFS-7916? HDFS-7916 is needed only if HDFS-7704 makes it. However, I see commits for HDFS-7916 in this list, but not for HDFS-7704. If HDFS-7704 is not in the list, we should not backport HDFS-7916 as it fixes an issue introduced by HDFS-7704. On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:10 P

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

Put the list here: https://wiki.apache.org/hadoop/Release-2.6.1-Working-Notes. And started figuring out ways to fast-path the cherry-picks. Thanks +Vinod On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli mailto:vino...@apache.org>> wrote: (2) With Wangda's help offline, I prepared an orde

Re: Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

This is done. Thanks +Vinod On Aug 11, 2015, at 1:15 PM, Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli mailto:vino...@apache.org>> wrote: (1) Create 2.6.1 branch and prep branch-2.6 for 2.6.2. I am doing this today.

Hadoop 2.6.1 Release process thread

Hi all, We had a long release-related discussion for 2.6.1 [1], and we pooled in a big list of patches [2]. Together with Akira and Sangjin who offered help with the release, I am starting the release process. Things to do (1) Create 2.6.1 branch and prep branch-2.6 for 2.6.2. I am doing this