It wasn’t a vote. PMC doesn’t vote on code-changes.
It was an extensive community discussion. We arrived at that decision to
reflect the reality that not many users were running JDK6 anyways at that point
of time.
Sorry to bust the bubble, this is not one of those things that supports your
Thanks Zhe!
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Zhe Zhang
wrote:
> Thanks for pointing it out Allen. I'll work on an addendum 2.6 patch for
> HADOOP-12800.
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:59 PM Allen Wittenauer >
> wrote:
>
> >
> > > On Jul
Thanks for pointing it out Allen. I'll work on an addendum 2.6 patch for
HADOOP-12800.
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 3:59 PM Allen Wittenauer
wrote:
>
> > On Jul 22, 2016, at 9:07 AM, Zhe Zhang
> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Allen for the note. I
> On Jul 22, 2016, at 9:07 AM, Zhe Zhang wrote:
>
> Thanks Allen for the note. I thought the 2.6 Dockerfile issue was addressed
> in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12800?
2.6 builds on JDK6 and JDK7. 2.x, where x>6, builds on JDK7 and JDK8. [1]
Thanks Allen for the note. I thought the 2.6 Dockerfile issue was addressed
in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-12800?
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 9:04 AM Allen Wittenauer
wrote:
>
> > On Jul 21, 2016, at 5:06 PM, Zhe Zhang
>
> On Jul 21, 2016, at 5:06 PM, Zhe Zhang wrote:
>
> We are using 2.6 releases and would like to see 2.6.5.
>
> One related issue, pre-commit is not working for 2.6 (see comment from
> Allen
>
Thanks Chris for stepping up! I'll work with Chris to get started on the
2.6.5 release soon.
Regards,
Sangjin
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Chris Trezzo wrote:
> Sangjin, I would be happy to help you with the work for cutting 2.6.5.
>
> Thanks!
> Chris Trezzo
>
> On Wed,
We are using 2.6 releases and would like to see 2.6.5.
One related issue, pre-commit is not working for 2.6 (see comment from
Allen
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-10653?focusedCommentId=15388621=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#comment-15388621).
Should
Sangjin, I would be happy to help you with the work for cutting 2.6.5.
Thanks!
Chris Trezzo
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Akira AJISAKA
wrote:
> Hi Sangjin,
>
> I'm thinking it's time for 2.6.5 release. Now there are 51 fixed issues in
> 2.6.5 and the number is
Hi Sangjin,
I'm thinking it's time for 2.6.5 release. Now there are 51 fixed issues
in 2.6.5 and the number is more than 2.6.4 (47).
> How long do we maintain this line? What would be a sensible EOL policy?
Ideally 5 years, because most of our customers in Japan are using Hadoop
cluster
The HBase community would like more 2.6.z releases.
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Ravi Prakash wrote:
> We for one are not using 2.6.*
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>
>> It's been a while since we had a release on the 2.6.x
We for one are not using 2.6.*
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 1:21 PM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> It's been a while since we had a release on the 2.6.x line. Is it time to
> get ready for a 2.6.5 release? Are folks using and relying on releases on
> 2.6.x? If there is enough interest, I
12 matches
Mail list logo