DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37427] - Redirect stdout and stderr to logging system

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37436] - [jci] Remove runtime dependency on FileUtil and IOUtil

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37436] New: - [jci] Remove runtime dependency on FileUtil and IOUtil

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37435] - [jci] Remove runtime dependency on StringUtil

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37435] - [jci] Remove runtime dependency on StringUtil

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37435] New: - Remove runtime dependency on StringUtil

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37433] - [jci] id element shoud be removed from contributors

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37433] New: - [jci] id element shoud be removed from contributors

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn commit: r332178 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk: project.xml src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/AbstractJavaCompiler.java src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/groovy/Groovy

Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/project.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/project.xml?rev=332178&r1=332177&r2=332178&view=diff == --- jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37390] - [jci] implement removeResourceStore

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37394] - [jci] Groovy no longer allows null CompilerConfiguration

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r332188 - /jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/janino/JaninoJavaCompiler.java

Author: tcurdt Date: Wed Nov 9 16:31:52 2005 New Revision: 332188 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332188&view=rev Log: removed unused adapter code Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/janino/JaninoJavaCompiler.java Modified: jakarta/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37123] - [jci] compilation problems are not delegated to CompilationProblemHandler

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36073] - JCI: random race conditions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36072] - JCI: errors and warnings not reported

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37389] - [jci] Optional ClassLoader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36071] - JCI: dependencies not managed

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36070] - JCI: Eclipse compiler doesn't handling warnings correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37409] - [jci] CompilerFactory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36069] - JCI: CompilingClassLoader race conditions

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36230] - [jci] Bug in JaninoJavaCompiler

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37389] - [jci] Optional ClassLoader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37409] - [jci] CompilerFactory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37409] - [jci] CompilerFactory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [jci] c#

Sorry I forgot that. http://tinyurl.com/cqn75 http://svn.plexus.codehaus.org/trunk/plexus-components/plexus- compiler/plexus-compilers/plexus-compiler-csharp/src/main/java/org/ codehaus/plexus/compiler/csharp/CSharpCompiler.java?rev=2723&view=markup Cool will have a look I was trying to av

Re: [jci] commons-logging use Was: patches

I really dislike the idea of a fork at this stage. Agreed. I'm trying to bring back a fork, so let's not make a third :) :-) As of the event model - it just feels a bit like re-inventing commons-logging. I don't agree (this is why I've posted here, not under a [logging] thread - I don't

Re: [jci] c#

true Brett Porter wrote: That might be nice, but I think both implementations are necessary. Not all of us want to run our Java in IKVM. Mark Proctor wrote: The plexus example uses a command line compiler, would be nice if we could use IKVM and use an embedded c# compiler - for much the same

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37389] - [jci] Optional ClassLoader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37409] - [jci] CompilerFactory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r332178 - in /jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk: project.xml src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/AbstractJavaCompiler.java src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/groovy/GroovyJava

Author: tcurdt Date: Wed Nov 9 15:46:18 2005 New Revision: 332178 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332178&view=rev Log: some fixes from Mark Proctor Modified: jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/project.xml jakarta/commons/sandbox/jci/trunk/src/java/org/apache/commons/jci/compilers/

Re: [jci] c#

That might be nice, but I think both implementations are necessary. Not all of us want to run our Java in IKVM. Mark Proctor wrote: The plexus example uses a command line compiler, would be nice if we could use IKVM and use an embedded c# compiler - for much the same reason why its nice to use

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37418] - [jci] we incorrect change groovy class name to a filename

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [betwixt] strange behaviour with multimapping

On 11/7/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > it's the two stages of polymorphism which are confusing the engine. a > BeanBindAction is used for the mapping to allow a later potential > polymorphic match. however, no check is made that the name is > appropriate. > > betwixt needs

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37418] - [jci] we incorrect change groovy class name to a filename

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37389] - [jci] Optional ClassLoader

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37431] - [pool] patch to remove GenericKeyedObjectPool's dep on CursorableLinkedList

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [jci] c#

The plexus example uses a command line compiler, would be nice if we could use IKVM and use an embedded c# compiler - for much the same reason why its nice to use Janino or Eclipse JDT over javac. Mark Brett Porter wrote: Torsten Curdt wrote: Some time back (and I'm still trying to get around

Re: [jci] commons-logging use Was: patches

Torsten Curdt wrote: I really dislike the idea of a fork at this stage. Agreed. I'm trying to bring back a fork, so let's not make a third :) As of the event model - it just feels a bit like re-inventing commons-logging. I don't agree (this is why I've posted here, not under a [logging] th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37431] - [pool] patch to remove GenericKeyedObjectPool's dep on CursorableLinkedList

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37153] - [pool] patch to use non-deprecated CursorableLinkedList from Collections

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37431] New: - [pool] patch to remove GenericKeyedObjectPool's dep on CursorableLinkedList

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [jci] c#

Torsten Curdt wrote: Some time back (and I'm still trying to get around to it), I talked about merging plexus-compiler with JCI. plexus-compiler has a basic c# interface (as well as eclipse, javac, jikes). For convenience - could you send us a URL to the repository location Sorry I forg

svn commit: r332171 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/betwixt/io/read/ test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/

Author: rdonkin Date: Wed Nov 9 15:05:13 2005 New Revision: 332171 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332171&view=rev Log: Added code that checks polymorpic code. Submitted by Thomas Dudziak. Issue#37369. Added: jakarta/commons/proper/betwixt/trunk/src/test/org/apache/commons/betwixt/T

Re: [logging] commons logging stubs [was Re: [jci] c#]

On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 15:51 +, Mark Proctor wrote: > We've been discussing the logging issue over in the Drools world. We > have decided not to fight against this, at some point or other as we > grow our capabilities and depend more on third party libraries we are > going to find a tool that

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37420] - [logging] Online JCL 1.0.4 API Javadoc missing

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [logging] javadoc missing from site

On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 21:24 +0100, Martin van den Bemt wrote: > Sorry robert :) not a problem :) > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/api/index.html is not there from > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/commons-logging-1.0.4/docs/ > though > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/loggin

Re: [logging] commons logging stubs [was Re: [jci] c#]

On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 12:48 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote: > > I also talked about removing the commons-logging dependency (which > > seemed to be in agreeance at the time), > > as at least in our environment we don't use it. > > The more I think about this the more I get the opinion we should > al

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37428] - [pool] patch to remove GenericObjectPool's dep on CursorableLinkedList

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37153] - [pool] patch to use non-deprecated CursorableLinkedList from Collections

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37428] New: - [pool] patch to remove GenericObjectPool's dep on CursorableLinkedList

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [logging] javadoc missing from site

Sorry robert :) http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/api/index.html is not there from http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/commons-logging-1.0.4/docs/ though http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/logging/commons-logging-1.0.4/docs/api/ exists, though without any content. Mvgr, Martin rober

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37427] New: - Redirect stdout and stderr to logging system

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [logging] javadoc missing from site

On 11/9/05, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 19:33 +0100, Martin van den Bemt wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > hi martin > > > The javadoc is missing from the commons-logging site (or is misplaced). > > where abouts is the missing link? 37420 [1] was filed few h

Re: [logging] javadoc missing from site

On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 19:33 +0100, Martin van den Bemt wrote: > Hi everyone, hi martin > The javadoc is missing from the commons-logging site (or is misplaced). where abouts is the missing link? - robert - To unsubscribe, e-

svn commit: r332126 - /jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt

Author: olegk Date: Wed Nov 9 11:43:12 2005 New Revision: 332126 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332126&view=rev Log: PR #37256 (Patch contributed by Loïc Péron) Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/release_notes.txt Modified: jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/rele

svn commit: r332125 - in /jakarta/commons/proper/httpclient/trunk/src: java/org/apache/commons/httpclient/methods/multipart/ test/org/apache/commons/httpclient/

Author: olegk Date: Wed Nov 9 11:41:40 2005 New Revision: 332125 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=332125&view=rev Log: PR #37256 (MultipartEntity incorrectly computes unknown length) Contributed by Loïc Péron Reviewed by Michael Becke, Oleg Kalnichevski, Ortwin Glück Modified: jakar

Re: Pool: comments requested for a new implementation

Currently Pool only depends on the CursorableLinkedList when using the Generic[Keyed]ObjectPool classes. I'd like to see this go away for two reasons. First, because the size of the Collections jar (546K) dwarfs the Pool jar (41K) and it's a slightly more of a hassle to manage two libs vs one. Seco

[logging] javadoc missing from site

Hi everyone, The javadoc is missing from the commons-logging site (or is misplaced). Mvgr, Martin - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [collections] any objections?

On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 00:38 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote: > robert burrell donkin wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 10:39 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: > > the reported issues seem only to occur when synchronizedMap is used. has > > anyone looked for a pattern in JVM versions? > No, not yet > > > or

Re: [logging] commons logging stubs [was Re: [jci] c#]

We've been discussing the logging issue over in the Drools world. We have decided not to fight against this, at some point or other as we grow our capabilities and depend more on third party libraries we are going to find a tool that insists on commons logging - so might as well be now. Atleast

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37379] - [transaction] FileResourceManager fails on Xids because of toString() usage for directory names

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[collections] New Buffer Wrapper Classes...

Based on my response to Sandy McArthur about using Buffers to implements Commons Pool, I started digging around the API. I came up with a couple of ideas: 1. A BoundedBuffer wrapper/decorator class, which basically enforces a maximum size of the enclosed buffer. 2. A TimeoutBuffer wrapper/deco

RE: Pool: comments requested for a new implementation

Actually, commons pool already depends upon commons collections, so it's not that much of a stretch. -Original Message- From: James Carman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 8:57 AM To: 'Jakarta Commons Developers List'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Pool: comme

RE: Pool: comments requested for a new implementation

If you don't mind a dependence upon Commons Collections, you should come up with a BufferPool, using the Commons Collections Buffer interface. The Buffer interface allows you to abstract away the LIFO vs. FIFO vs. priority queue vs. some other implementation stuff. All you do is call remove() and

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-html (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community integration. This i

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community integration.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-latka (in module jakarta-commons) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-swing (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-swing has an issue affecting its community integration. This

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37404] - [configuration] AbstractFileConfiguration.getFile() returns incorrect file object

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community integration. Th

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project commons-jelly-test (in module commons-jelly) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project commons-jelly-test has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue a

[logging] commons logging stubs [was Re: [jci] c#]

I also talked about removing the commons-logging dependency (which seemed to be in agreeance at the time), as at least in our environment we don't use it. The more I think about this the more I get the opinion we should also provide a commons-logging-stub.jar to satisfy commons-logging depende

Re: [jci] c#

Some time back (and I'm still trying to get around to it), I talked about merging plexus-compiler with JCI. plexus-compiler has a basic c# interface (as well as eclipse, javac, jikes). For convenience - could you send us a URL to the repository location I also talked about removing the com

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37404] - [configuration] AbstractFileConfiguration.getFile() returns incorrect file object

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu