How do you do that in m1?
properties
scopeoptional/scope
/properties
??
Hen
On 3/22/06, Nicolas De Loof [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm using maven2 and commons-configuration, and I need to configure
lot's of exclusion as commons-configuration POM declares lot's of
dependencies that
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39072.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39072.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Henri Yandell wrote on Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:14 AM:
How do you do that in m1?
properties
scopeoptional/scope
/properties
Exactly! The project.xml of configuration already have some deps with scope
definitions for test. Similar can be done for optional.
- Jörg
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38518.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I am think of changing the default behaviour of jsvc to block until the
JVM is started (see 34140).
Of course I will use the pool loop to detect the status of the son process.
Any comments
Cheers
Jean-Frederic
-
To
no, scope is different than optional
properties
optionaltrue/optional
/properties
On 3/23/06, Jörg Schaible [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote on Thursday, March 23, 2006 9:14 AM:
How do you do that in m1?
properties
scopeoptional/scope
/properties
Exactly! The
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38909.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38909.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38917.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39076.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39076.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39071.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39072.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-chain has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-xml-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-latka has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
no, scope is different than optional
properties
optionaltrue/optional
/properties
What is the definition of an optional dependency ? It depends on the use
of the library. If I use a plist configuration most of the time I would
not want the commons-codec dependency to
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
Emmanuel Bourg wrote on Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:59 PM:
Carlos Sanchez wrote:
no, scope is different than optional
properties
optionaltrue/optional
/properties
What is the definition of an optional dependency ? It depends
on the use
of the library. If I use a plist configuration
The documentation about scopes is defined here :
http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html
In maven 1, even if we don't use the scope for dependencies, you can define
them with
dependency
groupId???/groupId
artifactId/artifactId
I agree with this : only required for any use case dependencies have
to be made non-optional. Without this, transitive dependencies is not a
cool feature anymore and becomes a exclusion-hell.
Well, anything but core dependencies are IMHO optional.
If you decide to make usage of
So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
If there are any other votes out there they would be v.welcome :-)
Niall
On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
+1. Looks ok to me.
On 3/24/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
If there are any other votes out there they would be
On 3/23/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
snip/
Best if that issue doesn't arise, IMO.
If there are any other
On 3/22/06, Kevin Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find myself in the C# world these days, at a tremendous loss to the
libraries I am used to in the java world (not to mention some drastic
cultural changes), namely commons-* and my other open projects which are
very dependent on commons.
I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39076.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi,
I am interested in expanding the collections to include recursive
collections such as trees and graphs. Could somebody inform me of the
protocol?
--
Andres C. Rodriguez
Computer Scientist phone: (650) 515-3545
Artificial Intelligence Center
One other thought I had was to do what Saxon.NET has just done. They use
the java codebase through the ikvm.net compiler, then have test suites to
verify functionality. This has the natural benefit of most of the codebase
remaining maintained in one place, but providing the benefits to the .NET
Sorry, forgot the open source site:
http://saxon.sourceforge.net/
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Ross [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2006 12:04 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: Proposal: Commons for .NET (dotnet)
One other thought I had was to
On 3/23/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/23/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC (Stephen
Colebourne voted +1 on RC2)?
snip/
Best if
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39052.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 3/21/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
snip/
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
-Rahul
Niall
Author: rahul
Date: Thu Mar 23 11:28:23 2006
New Revision: 388240
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=388240view=rev
Log:
Add test cases to illustrate a stateless model package i.e. parse document
once, execute n times (simultaneously and/or sequentially).
Added:
Sorry for the dely, was quite busy the last days. RC3 looks good to me,
there are no more problems with the tests. So here is my +1!
Oliver
Niall Pemberton wrote:
So far only two votes on this RC (mine and Robert Burrell Donkin) - is
it legitimate to count someones vote from a previous RC
I tested RC2 with Commons Configuration and did not find any problems
(but this is not too meaningful because the dependency to Commons Pool
is only used by a test case for the database configuration class).
Some notes:
- There is no release notes file in neither the source nor the binary
On 3/23/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tested RC2 with Commons Configuration and did not find any problems
(but this is not too meaningful because the dependency to Commons Pool
is only used by a test case for the database configuration class).
Some notes:
- There is no release
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39052.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1
Phil
On 3/20/06, Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just uploaded release candidate 3 (RC3) for Commons Validator 1.3.0.
Thanks for all the feedback on RC2, differences from that RC are:
- corrected problems with localized tests
- corrected a problem generating the md5
hi kevin
On Wed, 2006-03-22 at 13:25 -0600, Kevin Ross wrote:
I find myself in the C# world these days, at a tremendous loss to the
libraries I am used to in the java world (not to mention some drastic
cultural changes), namely commons-* and my other open projects which are
very dependent on
This build works fine with our application.
My only wish would be to make BaseObjectPool.isClosed() public.
Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sandy
McArthur
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:03 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:45 -0500, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 3/23/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
- LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt have unix style line endings in the zips.
(This is not a problem for me, but was cause for some discussions in the
past.)
I'm on a mac os x box
On 3/23/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:45 -0500, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 3/23/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
- LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt have unix style line endings in the zips.
(This is not a problem for me, but was
I think its a great idea, if there is the demand and support there for
it. Robert is right in that Jakarta is quite Java-centric, but I have
noticed that Apache as a whole is becoming rather more diverse lately.
So even if you can't find a home at Jakarta, you may be able to drum up
support
On 3/23/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jakarta's charter is tied to the java language. IMHO the board is very
unlikely to make the same mistake again (language independent groupings
are preferred). this means that we cannot accept dot net code here
(which is one reason why
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22295.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Niall Pemberton wrote:
[X] +1 I support this release
[ ] +0
[ ] -0
[ ] -1 I do not support this release because...
Not sure whether you intended to include validator_2_0_0_proposal.dtd in
the release?
Stephen
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 14:12 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/23/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:45 -0500, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 3/23/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
- LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt have unix style line
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 14:12 -0800, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/23/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Thu, 2006-03-23 at 15:45 -0500, Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 3/23/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
-
+1
Build ok with:
- Ant 1.6.5
- Maven 1.0.2
- Sun Java 1.4.2_11
- Windows XP SP2
Gary
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sandy
McArthur
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2006 5:03 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; Jakarta Commons Users
On 3/23/06, robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but don't be too disappointed if the reaction is more or less: come back
once you have bootstrapped a community. i know that this is the most
difficult part of the process but react positively and try to get as
many community building
Added:
jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/model/DatamodelTest.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta/commons/sandbox/scxml/trunk/src/test/java/org/apache/commons/scxml/model/DatamodelTest.java?rev=388312view=auto
On 3/23/06, Gary Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This build works fine with our application.
My only wish would be to make BaseObjectPool.isClosed() public.
Gary, are you really wanting a way to test if the pool is closed or do
you want the returnObject and invalidateObject methods to be more
Sandy:
I am looking for a way to query the pool for its open/close state.
Background: for those who care ;)
When our app server shuts down, we have a couple of threads that need to
shutdown and clean up their resources. It so happens (don't ask) that
more than one thread may want to close() the
I think the pool 2 behavior will meet your needs but I'll let the code
speak for itself as it should be unambigous.
Take a look at the TestObjectPool.testClosedPoolBehavior() test (about
45% down the file) and let me know if a pool that passes that test
meets your needs. Here's a link to the
Author: sandymac
Date: Thu Mar 23 21:30:41 2006
New Revision: 388382
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=388382view=rev
Log:
many JavaDoc clean ups
behavior chages for pool 2 contracts
key handling fixes for close and clear methods in CompositeKeyedObjectPool
Modified:
Sandy McArthur wrote:
On 3/23/06, Oliver Heger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tested RC2 with Commons Configuration and did not find any problems
(but this is not too meaningful because the dependency to Commons Pool
is only used by a test case for the database configuration class).
Some notes:
-
65 matches
Mail list logo
