Get my +1 in the email record.
[X ] +1 Release Email 1.0 based on RC8
[ ] +0 General support but not definitive
[ ] -0 Unhappy about the release but not definitive (We want to
see RC9, RC10, and R11 first!)
[ ] -1 Do not release Email 1.0 based on RC8
Cheers,
Eric Pugh
On Sep 1,
Phil Steitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Agree with Robert's comments and am also +0, with three additional comments=
:
* The ant build depends javamail 1.3.2, while the maven POM references 1.3.=
3.=20
The ant build should be updated to match the POM
Ok, will do.
* It would be good to provide
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 14:31 -0400, Eric Pugh wrote:
I would like to restart the vote for Commons Email 1.0 based on RC8.
The various packaging/dependency issues have been resolved, and
Commons Email is working great on WebLogic. While this voting
process has dragged on, it has also led
Agree with Robert's comments and am also +0, with three additional comments:
* The ant build depends javamail 1.3.2, while the maven POM references 1.3.3.
The ant build should be updated to match the POM
* It would be good to provide some instructions in the README, release notes
or web site on
i don't seem to be able to RC8 in
http://people.apache.org/~epugh/commons-email/. should i be looking
somewhere else?
- robert
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 14:31 -0400, Eric Pugh wrote:
I would like to restart the vote for Commons Email 1.0 based on RC8.
The various packaging/dependency issues have
robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i don't seem to be able to RC8 in
http://people.apache.org/~epugh/commons-email/. should i be looking
somewhere else?
http://people.apache.org/~henning/commons-email/
:-)
Best regards
Henning
--
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.)
+1.
Release it already :-)
On 9/13/05, Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to restart the vote for Commons Email 1.0 based on RC8.
The various packaging/dependency issues have been resolved, and
Commons Email is working great on WebLogic. While this voting
process has dragged
I would like to restart the vote for Commons Email 1.0 based on RC8.
The various packaging/dependency issues have been resolved, and
Commons Email is working great on WebLogic. While this voting
process has dragged on, it has also led to a lot of polish being
added, and reducing the
Eric Pugh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to restart the vote for Commons Email 1.0 based on RC8.
The various packaging/dependency issues have been resolved, and
Commons Email is working great on WebLogic. While this voting
process has dragged on, it has also led to a lot of polish
Eric Pugh wrote:
I would like to restart the vote for Commons Email 1.0 based on RC8.
The various packaging/dependency issues have been resolved, and Commons
Email is working great on WebLogic. While this voting process has
dragged on, it has also led to a lot of polish being added, and
10 matches
Mail list logo
