On 3/9/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone mind if I kick off a 1.1.1 release? It looks like it's utterly
ready and just needs to be rolled and voted on.
Rescinding this - doesn't look like it's ready in that there's gubbins
to do for the build and I'm not clueful on the things
On 3/12/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The previous build style was very manual. The old ant files do build a valid
JCL jar, but were
*not* used as-is to generate previous official releases. One issue is that the
java.util.logging
adapters must of course be compiled with
On 13/03/07, Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/12/07, Julius Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've had the same problem. I *cannot* get 1.2 running on linux anymore.
I hate to say it but the only way I can get 1.2 going these days
is by installing it on Windows. Installs
Hi,
I've had the same problem. I *cannot* get 1.2 running on linux anymore.
I hate to say it but the only way I can get 1.2 going these days
is by installing it on Windows. Installs really nicely, to tell the
truth.
yours,
Julius
Given this, and your view that little change is
On 3/12/07, Julius Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've had the same problem. I *cannot* get 1.2 running on linux anymore.
I hate to say it but the only way I can get 1.2 going these days
is by installing it on Windows. Installs really nicely, to tell the
truth.
Yup. I hear you can
Henri Yandell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/9/07, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 17:51 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 3/9/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Anyone mind if I kick off a 1.1.1 release? It looks like
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 16:05 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 03:38 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
Definitely happy to give M2 a try; but I'd rather not change the
groupId on a bugfix release. We already have an M2 release in
FileUpload that didn't change the groupid so
Oleg Kalnichevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 16:05 +1300, Simon Kitching wrote:
I expect that this will be the last ever release of commons-logging.
There are no features missing, no known bugs, and as support for java
1.4 is now generally universal there is no
On 3/9/07, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 17:51 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 3/9/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Anyone mind if I kick off a 1.1.1 release? It looks like it's utterly
ready and just needs to be rolled and
Anyone mind if I kick off a 1.1.1 release? It looks like it's utterly
ready and just needs to be rolled and voted on.
Hen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Henri Yandell wrote:
Anyone mind if I kick off a 1.1.1 release? It looks like it's utterly
ready and just needs to be rolled and voted on.
Hen
I've been meaning to do this for a long time. There are a couple of
questions to consider before rolling the release:
1. How should it be built?
On 3/9/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
confident about in it now. Was kind of hoping that logging-1.1.1 would
be the first commons release to use Maven 2, but I can be persuaded.
Too late, commons-fileupload-1.2 is already out. :-)
--
Emacs 22 will support MacOS and CygWin. It
I've been meaning to do this for a long time. There are a couple of
questions to consider before rolling the release:
1. How should it be built?
Ant, Maven 1 or Maven 2. I've been working on the Maven 2 build and
feel confident about in it now. Was kind of hoping that
logging-1.1.1 would
On 3/9/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Anyone mind if I kick off a 1.1.1 release? It looks like it's utterly
ready and just needs to be rolled and voted on.
Hen
I've been meaning to do this for a long time. There are a couple of
questions to consider before
Definitely happy to give M2 a try; but I'd rather not change the
groupId on a bugfix release. We already have an M2 release in
FileUpload that didn't change the groupid so that's not a worry. Plus
I want to get it done quickly :)
Ah ...my +1 for changing the groupId was not meant for this
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 03:38 +0100, Torsten Curdt wrote:
Definitely happy to give M2 a try; but I'd rather not change the
groupId on a bugfix release. We already have an M2 release in
FileUpload that didn't change the groupid so that's not a worry. Plus
I want to get it done quickly :)
On Fri, 2007-03-09 at 17:51 -0800, Henri Yandell wrote:
On 3/9/07, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
Anyone mind if I kick off a 1.1.1 release? It looks like it's utterly
ready and just needs to be rolled and voted on.
Hen
I've been meaning to do this
On 3/9/07, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Option 1 is for the maven buildfile to ensure that all compilation and
unit tests are done with an external jdk of version 1.2. That's tricky
though.
I researched this question earlier this week. There are some links on
the compiler plugin
18 matches
Mail list logo
