I was talking about the one in cvs. I was trying to point
out that there
are other classes that suffer from the same problem that you
are fixing and
that there are other problems with one of the LRU
implementations. See the
other emails.
ok. I've looked over some of the classes you
-Original Message-
From: Michael Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 11:30 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [collections][PATCH] SequencedHashMap violates Map
contract,
has poor performance -- BufferCache, SequencedHastable, MRUMap
-Original Message-
From: Michael Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 5:17 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [collections][PATCH] SequencedHashMap violates Map
contract,
has poor performance -- BufferCache
Aaron Smuts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
I'm looking for new memory management algorithms for JCS. The LRU I'm
using, which is basically the LRUStore I added, is good, but I'd like
something more efficient for huge collections of objects. Basically,
every get results in a reshuffling
+1
Sounds good to me.
James
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've submitted this patch twice now (once back in mid-November, once a
week ago), but it still has yet to be committed.
If nobody has time to apply or look at Michael's patches, how about
] SequencedHashMap violates Map
contract, has poor performance
+1
Sounds good to me.
James
- Original Message -
From: Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've submitted this patch twice now (once back in mid-November, once a
week ago), but it still has yet to be committed.
If nobody has
Strachan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:01 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [collections][PATCH] SequencedHashMap violates Map
contract, has poor performance
+1
Sounds good to me.
James
- Original Message -
From: Remy
: Friday, February 01, 2002 9:25 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [collections][PATCH] SequencedHashMap violates Map contract,
has poor performance
-Original Message-
I just took a look at the code.
There were a couple of details that are still not clear
-Original Message-
From: Michael Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 3:25 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [collections][PATCH] SequencedHashMap violates Map
contract, has poor performance
-Original Message-
I just took
Just 2 comments:
- I understand the use of the sentinel but in the very fast glance I
took at the code I still did not understand a couple of bits of
code related to it. Since it was a very fast glance, it is very
probable that everything is ok and that I just didn't get it yet.
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Aaron Smuts wrote:
The SequencedHashMap has the same problem with the LinkedList remove
operation which executes in O(N) time as BufferCache, SequencedHastable, and
MRUMap.
Umm... I'm a bit confused. Are you referring to the SequencedHashMap
that exists in current CVS,
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:
No, there's no general rule and no Coding Style Police either :-)
If you contribute to a component, the general rule is that you're supposed
to follow the component's coding style.
that's rule number one in the Elements of Java Style. :)
michael
Developers List
Subject: RE: [collections][PATCH] SequencedHashMap violates
Map contract, has poor performance
+1
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sanders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 7:25 PM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE
: RE: [collections][PATCH] SequencedHashMap violates
Map contract,has poor performance
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
Michael, looks like you have made it to committer status
in Commons.
Do you want it? If so, do you have an apache id, and if
so, what is
it?
why
-
From: Paulo Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:59 AM
To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
Subject: RE: [collections][PATCH] SequencedHashMap violates
Map contract, has poor performance
+1
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sanders [mailto
15 matches
Mail list logo
