--- Alex Marshall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I'm curious if the vote was ever taken, and if so,
what was the result ?
I'd very much like
to see Functor come alive again and start taking
advantage of the
benefits of Java 5/6.
No vote has been taken. I'll start one when my time
Hello,
I'm curious if the vote was ever taken, and if so, what was the result ?
I'd very much like
to see Functor come alive again and start taking advantage of the
benefits of Java 5/6.
Alex Marshall
Software Developer
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MSN Messenger: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Pete--
I could be interested in being the Jakarta commons
conduit for a revival of the functor code. According
to the jakarta website, A revival of a Commons
Dormant component must be preceded by a VOTE on the
commons developers mailing list. Is there a general
feeling on-list as to
--- Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/30/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Pete--
I could be interested in being the Jakarta
commons
conduit for a revival of the functor code.
According
to the jakarta website, A revival of a Commons
Dormant component must
On 5/30/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Pete--
I could be interested in being the Jakarta commons
conduit for a revival of the functor code. According
to the jakarta website, A revival of a Commons
Dormant component must be preceded by a VOTE on the
commons developers mailing
On 5/30/07, Matt Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip/
Right, I meant whether the vote should be held as in
are there any reasons why reviving [functor] would be
simply out of the question? I wasn't implying any
desire to circumvent established protocols. :)
snap/
Not sure if there is
