Hi,
jakarta-commons-daemon-jsvc-1.0.1-1jpp
when installed on Fedora 4 Linux, does not appear to like the
installed JVM:
gij (GNU libgcj) version 4.0.0 20050519 (Red Hat 4.0.0-8)
Can anyone suggest a way to get this working?
I would like to use the installed JVM instead of Sun's.
Many thanks
Hi
How can I enter an issue for commons-daemon at
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi
I can't find the product/category anymore.
Many thanks
Bernard
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
On 5/20/06, Bernard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
How can I enter an issue for commons-daemon at
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/enter_bug.cgi
I can't find the product/category anymore.
Commons has moved to JIRA, and no longer uses Bugzilla. For Daemon issues,
please see:
Well it does, if the user remembers to upgrade all three plugins instead
of just one of them :)
--
Dennis Lundberg
Lukas Theussl wrote:
Version 1.9 of the m1 changelog plugin also introduced the
maven.changelog.date=lastRelease option, which will set the date
automatically to the last
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-jsl-test has an issue affecting its community
integration.
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-define-test has an issue affecting its community
I am reviewing the implementation code and the Householder reflections
algorithm to figure out why this is the case. The definitions that I
have seen (including the ones that you reference in the javadoc) use
the second approach (R is square). Generally, m is assumed to be
greater than or equal
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project commons-jelly-tags-html has an issue affecting its community
integration.
This
Guys,
this sounds like bike shed paint discussion.
We're under resourced here as it is.
Do we really have extra volunteers waiting to frack about making reports
consistent?
Does it really make it easier for our users? I haven't seen complaints about
inconsistent maven reports lately.
AFAICT,
Beyond what is available in the API (Q and R), what exactly does the
QR Decomp know that makes solving easier?
It has Q stored as a list of Householder vectors. Multiplying a matrix
with Q or Q' that is stored in this format is not much more expensive
than a normal matrix multiplication, but
Hello,
I am the creator of the Mantissa library
(http://www.spaceroots.org/software/mantissa/index.html), a Java library
providing some mathematical algorithms.
Mantissa provides several algorithms that could be useful for
Commons-Math. I think the objectives of the two libraries are quite
Dion Gillard wrote:
Guys,
this sounds like bike shed paint discussion.
Well, in that case I want mine blue ;)
We're under resourced here as it is.
Do we really have extra volunteers waiting to frack about making reports
consistent?
Does it really make it easier for our users? I haven't
On Sun, 2006-05-21 at 22:06 +0200, Dennis Lundberg wrote:
Dion Gillard wrote:
snip
We're under resourced here as it is.
Do we really have extra volunteers waiting to frack about making reports
consistent?
Does it really make it easier for our users? I haven't seen complaints
about
Martin Cooper wrote:
- findbugs (same as pmd?)
I would rather see this as + than -.
CheckStyle, PMD and findbugs have some overlap, but each one
has also unique code quality tests. There are a few more
utilities of this kind, and there's even a Java Code Meta
Checker which consolidates their
Luc Maisonobe wrote :
I don't think everything in Mantissa is useful for Commons-Math. IMHO,
the most interesting parts are :
- the estimation package
Gauss-Newton estimator (based on LU decomposition),
Levenberg-Marquardt estimator (based on QR decomposition)
- the fitting package
Beyond what is available in the API (Q and R), what exactly does the
QR Decomp know that makes solving easier?
foreword :
what is stated below is oriented only for least squares problems, it is
not a general discussion about decomposition algorithms.
When using QR decomposition in least
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-140?page=comments#action_12412711 ]
yu.peng commented on LANG-140:
--
How can I get the DurationFormatUtilsTest.java and fixed
DurationFormatUtils.java.
[lang] DurationFormatUtils.formatPeriod() returns the wrong
I'm way too bored to actually research this myself, but if you could post
the results of:
$ ls -lR $JAVA_HOME
I can probably tell you what you need to patch to get this working for GNU
Java. You could also try building from SVN co, since there have been some
JVM compatibility fixes there,
Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dion Gillard wrote:
Guys,
this sounds like bike shed paint discussion.
Well, in that case I want mine blue ;)
Paint mine green ;-).
We're under resourced here as it is.
Do we really have extra volunteers
On 5/20/06, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/06, Stephen Colebourne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
How about this for policy regarding Leads in Jira. Generally projects
have the Commons Developers user as their lead - unless the component
is in the process
On 5/21/06, Luc Maisonobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I am the creator of the Mantissa library
(http://www.spaceroots.org/software/mantissa/index.html), a Java library
providing some mathematical algorithms.
Mantissa provides several algorithms that could be useful for
Commons-Math. I
25 matches
Mail list logo
